Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy--Spiritual Personal Well-being; Czech Version

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Šarníková ◽  
Klára Maliňáková ◽  
Jana Fürstová ◽  
Eva Dubovská ◽  
Peter Tavel
2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Najmeh Jafari ◽  
Ahmadreza Zamani ◽  
Mark Lazenby ◽  
Ziba Farajzadegan ◽  
Hamid Emami ◽  
...  

AbstractObjective:The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Spiritual Well-Being (FACIT-Sp) scale is a valid and reliable instrument to provide an inclusive measure of spirituality in research and clinical practice. The aim of this study was to translate and investigate the reliability and validity of the Persian version of the FACIT-Sp.Method:The 12 item spiritual well-being subscale of the FACIT-Sp Version 4 was translated into the Persian language, Farsi, using the FACIT translation methodology. The questionnaire was administered to a diverse sample of 153 patients in treatment for cancer. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's α coefficient, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was applied to assess construct validity, and regression analysis was used to assess the predictor role of the FACIT-Sp in health-related quality of life (HRQOL).Results:Cronbach's α reliability coefficient for the FACIT-Sp subscales ranged from 0.72 to 0.90. The CFA generally replicated the original conceptualization of the three subscales of the FACIT-Sp12 (Peace, Meaning, and Faith). All three subscales significant predicted HRQOL.Significance of results:The Persian version of the FACIT-Sp scale is a reliable and valid tool for the clinical assessment of, and research into, the spiritual well-being of Muslim Iranian and Farsi-speaking patients in other regions of the world who are in treatment for cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1217-1223
Author(s):  
Alex K. Kørup ◽  
Sonja Wehberg ◽  
Elisabeth A. Hvidt ◽  
Niels Christian Hvidt ◽  
George Fitchett ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. e798-e806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine E. Duckworth ◽  
Robert Morrell ◽  
Gregory B. Russell ◽  
Bayard Powell ◽  
Mollie Canzona ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Adequate understanding of the goals and adverse effects of cancer treatment has important implications for patients’ decision making, expectations, and mood. This study sought to identify the degree to which patients and clinicians agreed upon the goals and adverse effects of treatment (ie, concordance). METHODS: Patients completed a demographic questionnaire, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer, the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey, the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-General questionnaire, the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being questionnaire, and a 13-item questionnaire about the goals and adverse effects of treatment. Providers completed a 12-item questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred patients (51 female) and 34 providers participated (questionnaire return rate mean difference, 5 days; SD, 16 days). Patient and provider dyads agreed 61% of the time regarding the intent of treatment. In cases of nonagreement, 36% of patients reported more optimistic therapy goals compared to providers. Patients and providers agreed 69% of the time regarding the patient’s acknowledgement and understanding of adverse effects. Patients who reported an understanding of likely adverse effects endorsed significantly lower distress scores (mean, 2.5) than those who endorsed not understanding associated adverse effects (mean, 4.1; P = .008). CONCLUSION: Timely data capturing of patient-provider dyadic ratings is feasible. A significant discrepancy exists between a substantial percentage of patients’ and providers’ views of the intent and adverse effects of treatment. Patients were almost always more optimistic about the intent of treatment. Higher rates of distress were noted in cases of discordance. Providers may benefit from conversational feedback from patients as well as other integrated feedback systems to inform them about patient understanding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document