scholarly journals How consistent is mind wandering across situations and tasks? A latent state–trait analysis.

Author(s):  
Jan Rummel ◽  
Dirk Hagemann ◽  
Lena Steindorf ◽  
Anna-Lena Schubert
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Rummel ◽  
Dirk Hagemann ◽  
Lena Steindorf ◽  
Anna-Lena Schubert

We investigated how consistent self-reported task-unrelated thoughts (TUTs), which are the most frequently used indicators of mind wandering, are across different situations and tasks. We assessed TUTs at two occasions within a cognitive and a reading task. Results from a latent state-trait model suggest that TUTs are somewhat consistent and task-specific but not situation-specific. These findings suggest that mind wandering indexed as TUTs should be considered a trait rather than a state.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myrthe Faber

Abstract Gilead et al. state that abstraction supports mental travel, and that mental travel critically relies on abstraction. I propose an important addition to this theoretical framework, namely that mental travel might also support abstraction. Specifically, I argue that spontaneous mental travel (mind wandering), much like data augmentation in machine learning, provides variability in mental content and context necessary for abstraction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 878-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Marcusson-Clavertz ◽  
Oscar N. E. Kjell

Abstract. Thinking about task-unrelated matters (mind wandering) is related to cognition and well-being. However, the relations between mind wandering and other psychological variables may depend on whether the former commence spontaneously or deliberately. The current two studies investigated the psychometric properties of the Spontaneous and Deliberate Mind Wandering Scales (SDMWS; Carriere, Seli, & Smilek, 2013 ). Study 1 evaluated the stability of the scales over 2 weeks ( N = 284 at Time 1), whereas Study 2 ( N = 323) evaluated their relations to Generalized anxiety disorder symptoms, Openness, Social desirability, and experience-sampling reports of intentional and unintentional mind wandering during an online cognitive task. The results indicated that the SDMWS were better fitted with a two-factor than a one-factor solution, although the fit was improved with the exclusion of one item. The scales exhibited strong measurement invariance across gender and time, and moderately high test-retest reliability. Spontaneous mind wandering predicted Generalized anxiety disorder and experience-sampling reports of unintentional mind wandering, whereas Deliberate mind wandering predicted Openness and experience-sampling reports of intentional mind wandering. Furthermore, Spontaneous mind wandering showed a negative association with social desirability of weak-to-medium strength. In sum, the scales generally showed favorable psychometric properties.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel A. Radvansky ◽  
Sabine A. Krawietz ◽  
Andrea K. Tamplin
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document