scholarly journals CMF vs alternating CMF/EV in the adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer. A single centre randomised clinical trial (Naples GUN-3 study)

1995 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 1283-1287 ◽  
Author(s):  
S De Placido ◽  
F Perrone ◽  
C Carlomagno ◽  
A Morabito ◽  
C Pagliarulo ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivien HC Bramwell ◽  
Alan B Tuck ◽  
Judith-Anne W Chapman ◽  
Pieter H Anborgh ◽  
Carl O Postenka ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 63-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Casadei ◽  
Claudio Ricci ◽  
Giovanni Taffurelli ◽  
Carlo Alberto Pacilio ◽  
Donatella Santini ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 547-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
T J Powles ◽  
T F Hickish ◽  
A Makris ◽  
S E Ashley ◽  
M E O'Brien ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To evaluate in a randomized clinical trial systemic chemoendocrine therapy used as primary (neo-adjuvant) treatment before surgery in women with primary operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged less than 70 years with clinically palpable, primary operable breast cancer diagnostically confirmed by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and suitable for treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and tamoxifen were considered eligible. Patients randomized to neoadjuvant treatment received four cycles of chemo-therapy for 3 months before surgery followed by another four cycles after surgery, and were compared with patients randomized to adjuvant therapy who received eight cycles of chemotherapy over 6 months after surgery. RESULTS Of 212 patients who were randomized to receive either adjuvant (n = 107) or neoadjuvant (n = 105) chemoendocrine therapy, 200 are now assessable for response. The two groups are comparable for age, menopausal status, disease stage, and surgical requirements. The overall clinical response rate was 85%, with a complete histologic response rate of 10%. There was a significant reduction in the requirement for mastectomy in patients who received neoadjuvant treatment (13%) as compared with those who received adjuvant therapy (28%) (P < .005). Symptomatic and hematologic acute toxicity was low and similar for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. The median follow-up period for patients in this trial is 28 months, during which time four patients have relapsed locally and 20, including one of the local relapses, have developed metastatic disease, 19 of whom have died. The follow-up period is too brief to evaluate relapse rate or survival duration. CONCLUSION This trial confirms previous reports of a high rate of response to neoadjuvant therapy, but is the first to include small primary cancers and to show, in the context of a randomized trial, a reduction in the requirement for mastectomy. Until disease-free and overall survival data are available from the larger National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)-18 trial, such neoadjuvant treatment cannot be recommended outside of a clinical trial.


1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 1772-1779 ◽  
Author(s):  
R D Gelber ◽  
A Goldhirsch

Between 1978 and 1981, 463 evaluable postmenopausal patients 65 years of age or younger with operable breast cancer and metastases in axillary lymph nodes were entered in Ludwig Breast Cancer Study III (Ludwig III) and randomly allocated to receive chemoendocrine therapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, low-dose continuous prednisone, and tamoxifen (CMFp + T) for 12 monthly cycles, or endocrine therapy alone with prednisone and tamoxifen (p + T) for 1 year, or no adjuvant treatment after mastectomy (observation). At 60 months' median follow-up, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 59% for CMFp + T, 41% for p + T, and 31% for observation (P less than .0001), and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 71% for CMFp + T, 64% for p + T, and 59% for observation (P = .16; CMFp + T v observation, P = .07). A new quality of life-oriented endpoint was defined to assist in the selection of therapeutic approach after surgery for postmenopausal patients: the time without symptoms of disease and subjective toxic effects of treatment (TWiST). Despite the larger initial discount due to subjective toxicity with chemoendocrine therapy, by 5 years postmastectomy the net difference in average TWiST for treated patients compared with the observation group was positive and approximately equal for both adjuvant treatment programs. Adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for postmenopausal women appears to be justified due to an emerging OS advantage and increasing TWiST gained for the treated patients.


The Lancet ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 331 (8586) ◽  
pp. 609-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.S. Fentiman ◽  
M.A. Chaudary ◽  
D.Y. Wang ◽  
K. Brame ◽  
R.S. Camplhjohn ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document