scholarly journals S-1 chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy after D1/D2 lymph node dissection in patients with node-positive gastric cancer: a phase I/II study

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
X Wang ◽  
D B Zhao ◽  
L Yang ◽  
Y Chi ◽  
Y Tang ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Ren ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Wei-Hu Wang ◽  
Shu-Lian Wang ◽  
Yong-Wen Song ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) with oral capecitabine and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was well tolerated in a phase I study in patients who had undergone partial or total gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer. This phase II study aimed to further determine the efficacy and toxicity of this combination after radical resection and D1/D2 lymph node dissection (LND) for local advanced gastric patients.Methods: Forty patients (median age, 53 years; range, 24–71 years) with pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma who underwent D1/D2 LND were included in this study. The patients received ACRT comprising IMRT (total irradiation dose: 45 Gy delivered in daily 1.8-Gy fractions on 5 days a week over 5 weeks) and capecitabine chemotherapy (dose: 800 mg/m² twice daily throughout the duration of RT). The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), toxic effects, and treatment compliance.Results: The 3-year DFS and OS were 66.2% and 75%, respectively. The median time to recurrence was 19.5 months (range, 6.1–68 months). Peritoneal implantation (n = 10) was the most common recurrence pattern, and the lung was the most common site of extra-abdominal metastases (n = 5). Nine patients developed grade 3 or 4 toxicities during ACRT. Two patients discontinued ACRT, while 11 underwent ACRT without receiving the entire course of capecitabine. There were no treatment-related deaths.Conclusion: The ACRT protocol described herein showed acceptable safety and efficacy for local advanced gastric cancer received radical gastrectomy and D1/2 LND.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01674959. Registered August 2012 - Retrospectively registered, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12345678


Author(s):  
Van Huong Nguyen

TÓM TẮT Đặt vấn đề: Nghiên cứu nhằm đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi hoàn toàn và phẫu thuật nội soi hỗ trợ cắt toàn bộ dạ dày nạo vét hạch D2 do ung thư tại Bệnh viện Hữu nghị Đa khoa Nghệ An. Phương pháp: Nghiên cứu mô tả hồi cứu, gồm 126 bệnh nhân ung thư dạ dày được phẫu thuật nội soi hoàn toàn và phẫu thuật nội soi hỗ trợ cắt toàn bộ dạ dày vét hạch D2, từ 2013 đến 2020 Kết quả: Tuổi trung bình 60,6 ± 11,1 tuổi. Tỷ lệ nam/nữ 2.8/1. Ung thư ở giai đoạn I, II, III là 19,0%, 49,2%, 31,7%. Ung thư biểu mô tuyến nhú và ống là 70,6% và tế bào nhẫn là 24,6%. Tỷ lệ tai biến trong mổ của nhóm PTNS hoàn toàn là 4,4% và PTNS hỗ trợ 20,6%. Số hạch nạo vét được trung bình của 2 nhóm PTNS hoàn toàn là 23,7 ± 7,1 hạch và PTNS hỗ trợ là 18,0 ± 7,2 hạch. Lượng máu mất trung bình của PTNS hoàn toàn 30,56 ± 10,2 ml và PTNS hỗ trợ 36,11 ± 9,9 ml. Thời gian phẫu thuật trung bình của nhóm PTNS hoàn toàn là 206,4 ± 30,6 phút và PTNS hỗ trợ 220 ± 40,9 phút. Tỷ lệ biến chứng sau mổ của nhóm PTNS hoàn toàn là 4,4% và PTNS hỗ trợ là 22,3%. Thời gian nằm viện trung bình của nhóm PTNS hoàn toàn là 7,5 ± 2,1 ngày và PTNS hỗ trợ là 10,2 ± 2,4 ngày. Kết luận: Phẫu thuật nội soi hoàn toàn và phẫu thuật nội soi hỗ trợ cắt toàn bộ dạ dày nạo vét hạch D2 do ung thư là kỹ thuật an toàn và hiệu quả trong điều trị ung thư dạ dày. ABSTRACT EVALUATION OF OUTCOMES TOTALLY LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY AND LAPAROSCOPIC - ASSISTED TOTAL GASTRECTOMY WITH D2 LYMPH NODE DISSECTION DUE TO CANCER Introduction: To evaluate the results of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) and laparoscopicassisted total gastrectomy (LATG) with D2 lymph node dissection to treat gastric cancer in the Nghean General Friendship Hospital. Materials and Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, 126 patients with gastric cancer underwent TLTG and LATG with D2 lymph node dissection between 2013 and 2020. Results: There were 126 patients with an average age of 60.6 ± 11.1 years. The male/female ratio was 2.8/1. The percent of patients with tumors at stages I, II, III were 19.0%, 49.2%, 31.7%, 70.6% of patients had papillary adenocarcinoma and tubular adenocarcinoma. Patients with ring cell carcinoma wereaccounted for 24.6%. The total percent of incidents during the surgery of the group of TLTG was 4.4%, and the group of LATG was 20.6%. The average number of harvested lymph nodes in the group of TLTG was 23.7 ± 7.1, and the group of LATG was 18.0 ± 7.2. The average blood loss in the group of TLTG was 30.56 ± 10.2 ml, and the group of LATG was 36.11 ± 9.9 ml, and the average operation time in the group of TLTG was 206.4 ± 30.6 minutes, and the group of LATG was 220 ± 40.9 minutes. The total percent of postoperative complications in the group of TLTG was 4.4%, and the group of LATG was 22.3%. The hospital stays in the group of TLTG was 7.5 ± 2.1 days, and the group of LATG was 10.2 ± 2.4 days. Conclusions: TLTG and LATGwith D2 lymph node dissectionwere safe and effective in treating gastric cancer. Keywords: Laparoscopic gastrectomy, gastric cancer, total gastrectomy


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-121
Author(s):  
Sandrie Mariella Mac ◽  
Ashish Bahadur Malla

For many decades, D2 procedure has been accepted in the far-east as the standard treatment for both early (EGC) and advanced gastric cancer (AGC). In case of AGC, the debate on the extent of nodal dissection has been open for many years in order to highlight the safety and efficacy of treatment, hence this study. A comprehensive literature research was performed in PubMed to identify studies that compared laparoscopic- assisted gastrectomy (LAG) and open gastrectomy (OG) with D2 lymph node dissection (D2-LND) for treatment of AGC for the last five years. Data of interest were checked and subjected to meta-analysis with RevMan 5.3 software. The pooled risk ratios (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Overall, 19 studies were included in this meta-analysis. LG had some advantages over OG, including shorter hospitalization (WMD -2.31; 95% CI -4.09 to -0.53; P = 0.01), less blood loss (WMD -120.49; 95% CI -174.27 to -66.71; P < 0.01), faster bowel recovery (WMD -0.55; 95% CI -0.86 to -0.24; P ˂ 0.01) and earlier ambulation (WMD -0.75; 95% CI -1.38 to -0.11; P = 0.02). In terms of surgical and oncological safety, LG could achieve similar lymph nodes (WMD, -0.94, 95% CI, -2.95 to 1.06; P=0.36), a lower complication rate [odds ratio (OR)=0.80; 95%CI, 0.68-0.97; P=0.02], and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) comparable to OG. In conclusion, for AGCs both techniques (LAG and OG) appeared comparable in short- and long-term results. More time was needed to perform LAG; nonetheless, it had some advantages in achieving faster postoperative recovery over OG. In order to clarify this controversial issue ongoing trials and future studies are needed.


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 383-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Bo Wei ◽  
Bo Wei ◽  
Cui-Ling Qi ◽  
Tu-Feng Chen ◽  
Yong Huang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document