scholarly journals The Israeli national population program of genetic carrier screening for reproductive purposes

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joël Zlotogora ◽  
Itamar Grotto ◽  
Ehud Kaliner ◽  
Ronni Gamzu
Author(s):  
Joël Zlotogora

AbstractThe Israeli population genetic screening program for reproductive purposes, is a population-specific screening that includes all known, severe diseases and relatively frequent in a specific population (carrier frequency at or above 1:60 and/or disease frequency at or above 1 in 15,000 live births). The carrier screening program is free of charge and offers testing according to disease frequency in the different groups within the population.The extraordinary technical changes that occurred in the last decade as well as the changes in the type of marriages within the Israeli population necessitate a revision in the basis of the program.The screening should include instead of only the relatively frequent variants, all the variants that were reported among patients causing a severe disease for which the natural history is well known without regard of their frequency. The population-specific screening that determine which variants are included according to the origin of the couple should be abandoned for a general screening including either all the Jewish population or all the Israeli Arab population.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Gbur ◽  
Logan Mauney ◽  
Kathryn J. Gray ◽  
Louise Wilkins‐Haug ◽  
Stephanie Guseh

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebony Richardson ◽  
Alison McEwen ◽  
Toby Newton-John ◽  
Karine Manera ◽  
Chris Jacobs

Abstract Background Reproductive genetic carrier screening is a type of genetic testing available to those planning a pregnancy, or during their first trimester, to understand their risk of having a child with a severe genetic condition. There is a lack of consensus for ‘what to measure’ in studies on this intervention, leading to heterogeneity in choice of outcomes and methods of measurement. Such outcome heterogeneity has implications for the quality and comparability of these studies and has led to a lack of robust research evidence in the literature to inform policy and decision-making around the offer of this screening. As reproductive genetic carrier screening becomes increasingly accessible within the general population, it is timely to investigate the outcomes of this intervention. Objectives The development of a core outcome set is an established methodology to address issues with outcome heterogeneity in research. We aim to develop a core outcome set for reproductive genetic carrier screening to clarify and standardise outcomes for research and practice. Methods In accordance with guidance from the COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative, this study will consist of five steps: (i) a systematic review of quantitative studies, using narrative synthesis to identify previously reported outcomes, their definitions, and methods of measurement; (ii) a systematic review of qualitative studies using content analysis to identify excerpts related to patient experience and perspectives that can be interpreted as outcomes; (iii) semi-structured focus groups and interviews with patients who have undertaken reproductive genetic carrier screening to identify outcomes of importance to them; (iv) Delphi survey of key stakeholders, including patients, clinicians, and researchers, to refine and prioritise the list of outcomes generated from the previous steps; and (v) a virtual consensus meeting with a purposive sample of key stakeholders to finalise the core outcome set for reporting. Discussion This protocol outlines the core outcome set development process and its novel application in the setting of genetic testing. This core outcome set will support the standardisation of outcome reporting in reproductive carrier screening research and contribute to an evolving literature on outcomes to evaluate genetic testing and genetic counselling as health interventions. COMET core outcome set registration http://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/1381.


Author(s):  
Mariam Eissa ◽  
Taghrid Aloraini ◽  
Lamia Alsubaie ◽  
Abdulrahman Alswaid ◽  
Wafaa Eyiad ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. 104075
Author(s):  
Lauren A. Thomas ◽  
Sharon Lewis ◽  
John Massie ◽  
Edwin P. Kirk ◽  
Alison D. Archibald ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 709-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel Pereira ◽  
Michelle Wood ◽  
Emerly Luong ◽  
Allison Briggs ◽  
Michael Galloway ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Ekstrand Ragnar ◽  
Tanja Tydén ◽  
Ulrik Kihlbom ◽  
Margareta Larsson

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 460-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Stafler ◽  
Meir Mei-Zahav ◽  
Michael Wilschanski ◽  
Huda Mussaffi ◽  
Ori Efrati ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document