scholarly journals 1. Genome-Wide RNAi Screening Identifies Host Restriction Factors Critical for In Vivo AAV Transduction

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S1
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Sharon ◽  
Sean Nesdoly ◽  
Hsin J. Yang ◽  
Jean-François Gélinas ◽  
Yu Xia ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (20) ◽  
pp. 10136-10144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran D. Mir ◽  
Maud Mavigner ◽  
Charlene Wang ◽  
Mirko Paiardini ◽  
Donald L. Sodora ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTMacrophages are target cells of HIV/SIV infection that may play a role in AIDS pathogenesis and contribute to the long-lived reservoir of latently infected cells during antiretroviral therapy (ART). In previous work, we and others have shown that during pathogenic SIV infection of rhesus macaques (RMs), rapid disease progression is associated with high levels ofin vivomacrophage infection. In contrast, during nonpathogenic SIV infection of sooty mangabeys (SMs), neither spontaneous nor experimental CD4+T cell depletion results in substantial levels ofin vivomacrophage infection. To test the hypothesis that SM macrophages are intrinsically more resistant to SIV infection than RM macrophages, we undertook anin vitrocomparative assessment of monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) from both nonhuman primate species. Using the primary isolate SIVM949, which replicates well in lymphocytes from both RMs and SMs, we found that infection of RM macrophages resulted in persistent SIV-RNA production while SIV-RNA levels in SM macrophage cultures decreased 10- to 100-fold over a similar temporal course ofin vitroinfection. To explore potential mechanisms responsible for the lower levels of SIV replication and/or production in macrophages from SMs we comparatively assessed, in the two studied species, the expression of the SIV coreceptor as well as the expression of a number of host restriction factors. While previous studies showed that SM monocytes express lower levels of CCR5 (but not CD4) than RM monocytes, the level of CCR5 expression in MDMs was similar in the two species. Interestingly, we found that SM macrophages exhibited a significantly greater increase in the expression of tetherin (P= 0.003) and TRIM22 (P= 0.0006) in response to alpha interferon stimulation and increased expression of multiple host restriction factors in response to lipopolysaccharide stimulation and exposure to SIV. Overall, these findings confirm, in anin vitroinfection system, that SM macrophages are relatively more resistant to SIV infection compared to RM macrophages, and suggest that a combination of entry and postentry restriction mechanisms may protect these cells from productive SIV infection.IMPORTANCEThis manuscript represents the firstin vivocomparative analysis of monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) between rhesus macaques, i.e., experimental SIV hosts in which the infection is pathogenic and macrophages can be infected, and sooty mangabeys, i.e., natural SIV hosts in which the infection is nonpathogenic and macrophages are virtually never infectedin vivo. This study demonstrates that mangabey-derived MDMs are more resistant to SIV infectionin vitrocompared to macaque-derived MDMs, and provides a potential explanation for this observation by showing increased expression of specific retrovirus restriction factors in mangabey-derived macrophages. Overall, this study is important as it contributes to our understanding of why SIV infection is nonpathogenic in sooty mangabeys while it is pathogenic in macaques, and is consistent with a pathogenic role forin vivomacrophage infection during pathogenic lentiviral infection.


2017 ◽  
Vol 381 ◽  
pp. 1006
Author(s):  
S. Nozuma ◽  
E. Matsuura ◽  
T. Matsuzaki ◽  
D. Kodama ◽  
R. Kubota ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 109-112
Author(s):  
Kira S. Koryabina ◽  
Mariya V. Sergeeva ◽  
Andrey B. Komissarov ◽  
Nataliya V. Eshchenko ◽  
Grigoriy A. Stepanov

BACKGROUND: The application of CRISPR/Cas9 is one of the most rapidly developing areas in biotechnology. This method was used to obtain clones of а human origin cell line with knockout of one or more genes of the IFITM family, representing host restriction factors for influenza infection. Amphotericin B has previously been shown to promote influenza infection by blocking IFITM3 function. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of amphotericin B on the sensitivity of IFITM knockout cells to influenza A virus infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: WI-38 VA-13 cells and mutant clones with IFITM3 knockout (F3 clone) or IFITM1, IFITM3 knockout (clone E12) were infected with influenza virus A/PR/8/34 (H1N1) in the presence or absence of amphotericin B. Forty-four hours after infection, the culture medium was taken to determine the infectious activity of the virus by titration in the MDCK cell culture, as well as the hemagglutinating activity of the virus. The infected cells were stained with fluorescently labeled antibodies against the viral NP protein, and the number of NP-positive cells was determined by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The addition of amphotericin B increased the hemagglutinating and infectious activity of the virus in WI-38 VA-13cells, while the difference was insignificant for clones with IFITM gene knockout. A similar dependency was obtained for the percent of infected cells. CONCLUSIONS: Mutant cells with a knockout of one or several genes of the IFITM family were equally susceptible to influenza infection regardless of the addition of amphotericin B, which confirms the crucial importance of a defect in the IFITM3 protein in increasing the permissiveness of cells to influenza A virus.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 184-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa D`Urbano ◽  
Elisa De Crignis ◽  
Maria Carla Re

Mammalian cells have evolved several mechanisms to prevent or block lentiviral infection and spread. Among the innate immune mechanisms, the signaling cascade triggered by type I interferon (IFN) plays a pivotal role in limiting the burden of HIV-1. In the presence of IFN, human cells upregulate the expression of a number of genes, referred to as IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), many of them acting as antiviral restriction factors (RFs). RFs are dominant proteins that target different essential steps of the viral cycle, thereby providing an early line of defense against the virus. The identification and characterization of RFs have provided unique insights into the molecular biology of HIV-1, further revealing the complex host-pathogen interplay that characterizes the infection. The presence of RFs drove viral evolution, forcing the virus to develop specific proteins to counteract their activity. The knowledge of the mechanisms that prevent viral infection and their viral counterparts may offer new insights to improve current antiviral strategies. This review provides an overview of the RFs targeting HIV-1 replication and the mechanisms that regulate their expression as well as their impact on viral replication and the clinical course of the disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e1008268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nenavath Gopal Naik ◽  
Thomas Hong Nguyen ◽  
Lauren Roberts ◽  
Luke Todd Fischer ◽  
Katherine Glickman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 270 ◽  
pp. 197647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Wei ◽  
Chuangchao Zou ◽  
Siying Zeng ◽  
Chunyi Xue ◽  
Yongchang Cao

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 757-760
Author(s):  
Federico Giovannoni ◽  
Peter Hemmerich ◽  
Cybele Carina García

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document