scholarly journals Inelastic collisions of ultracold triplet Rb2 molecules in the rovibrational ground state

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn Drews ◽  
Markus Deiß ◽  
Krzysztof Jachymski ◽  
Zbigniew Idziaszek ◽  
Johannes Hecker Denschlag
1968 ◽  
Vol 46 (19) ◽  
pp. 2127-2131 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Stupavsky ◽  
L. Krause

3 2P1/2 ↔ 3 2P3/2 excitation transfer in sodium, induced in inelastic collisions with ground-state N2, H2, HD, and D2 molecules, has been investigated in a series of sensitized fluorescence experiments. Mixtures of sodium vapor at a pressure of 5 × 10−7 Torr, and the gases, were irradiated with each NaD component in turn, and the fluorescence which contained both D components was monitored at right angles to the direction of the exciting beam. Measurements of the relative intensities of the NaD fluorescent components yielded the following collision cross sections for excitation transfer. For Na–N2 collisions: Q12(2P1/2 → P3/2) = 144 Å2, Q21(2P1,2 ← 2P3/2) = 76 Å2 for Na–H2 collisions: Q12 = 80 Å2, Q21 = 42 Å2. For Na–HD collisions: Q12 = 84 Å2, Q21 = 44 Å2. For Na–D2 collisions: Q12 = 98 Å2, Q21 = 52 Å2. The cross sections Q21 exhibit a slight resonance effect between the atomic and molecular rotational transitions.


1973 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. N. Siara ◽  
L. Krause

Excitation transfer between the 62P fine-structure substates in rubidium, induced in inelastic collisions with ground-state molecules, has been studied using techniques of sensitized fluorescence. Rubidium vapor in mixtures with various molecular gases was irradiated with each component of the 2P rubidium doublet in turn, and measurements of sensitized-to-resonance fluorescent intensity ratios yielded the following mixing cross sections Q12(2P1/2 → 2P3/2) and Q21(2P1/2 ← 2P3/2), as well as effective quenching cross sections Q1X(2P1/2 → 2XJ″) and Q2X(2P3/2 → 2XJ″). For collisions with H2: Q12(2P1/2 → 2P3/2) = (41 ± 5) Å2; Q21(2P1/2 ← 2P3/2) = (26 ± 3) Å2; Q1X(2P1/2 → 2XJ″) = (36 ± 9) Å2; Q2X(2P3/2 → 2XJ″) = (31 ± 8) Å2. For HD: Q12 = (42 ± 5) Å2; Q21 = (27 ± 4) Å2; Q1X = (47 ± 13) Å2; Q2X = (38 ± 10) Å2. For D2: Q12 = (42 ± 5) Å2; Q21 = (27 ± 4) Å2; Q1X = (28 ± 8) Å2; Q2X = (21 ± 7) Å2. For N2: Q12 = (107 ± 15) Å2; Q21 = (70 ± 10) Å2; Q1X = (128 ± 44) Å2; Q2X = (126 ± 33) Å2. For CH4: Q12 = (38 ± 6) Å2; Q21 = (24 ± 3) Å2; Q1X = (129 ± 41) Å2; Q2X = (114 ± 37) Å2. For CD4: Q12 = (52 ± 7) Å2; Q21 = (34 ± 5) Å2; Q1X = (82 ± 30) Å2; Q2X = (76 ± 22) Å2. An analysis of these results suggests the possibility of resonances with various molecular rotational and vibrational transitions.


2012 ◽  
Vol 109 (22) ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott T. Sullivan ◽  
Wade G. Rellergert ◽  
Svetlana Kotochigova ◽  
Eric R. Hudson

1978 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1343-1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Cohen ◽  
Lee A. Collins ◽  
Neal F. Lane

1973 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 334-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Czajkowski ◽  
G. Skardis ◽  
L. Krause

Collisional transfer of excitation from mercury to sodium was investigated using methods of sensitized fluorescence. A mixture of mercury and sodium vapors at low pressure was irradiated with Hg 2537 Å resonance radiation, producing a population of Hg(63P1) atoms whose inelastic collisions with ground-state sodium atoms resulted in a transfer of excitation energy to close-lying S, P, and D states in sodium. The subsequent decay of these states manifested itself in the emission of a sensitized fluorescent spectrum. Absolute intensity measurements on the components of the spectrum yielded 21 cross sections whose magnitudes range from 0.02 to 38.5 Å2 and which exhibit a pronounced resonance with ΔE, the energy defect between Hg (63P1) and the appropriate level in sodium.


Science ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 341 (6150) ◽  
pp. 1094-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Chefdeville ◽  
Yulia Kalugina ◽  
Sebastiaan Y. T. van de Meerakker ◽  
Christian Naulin ◽  
François Lique ◽  
...  

Partial wave resonances predicted to occur in bimolecular collision processes have proven challenging to observe experimentally. Here, we report crossed-beam experiments and quantum-scattering calculations on inelastic collisions between ground-state O2 and H2 molecules that provide state-to-state cross sections for rotational excitation of O2 (rotational state N = 1, j = 0) to O2 (N = 1, j = 1) in the vicinity of the thermodynamic threshold at 3.96 centimeter−1. The close agreement between experimental and theoretical results confirms the classically forbidden character of this collision-induced transition, which occurs exclusively in a purely quantum mechanical regime via shape and Feshbach resonances arising from partial waves with total angular momentum (J) = 2 to 4.


An outstanding defect of the old quantum theory was its inability to treat the phenomena occurring in the collision of electrons with atoms, and Born’s theory showed how the new quantum mechanics was capable of removing this defect. The original theory of Born was a method of successive approximations to the solution of the wave equation representing the colliding systems, and could be applied to both elastic and inelastic collisions. In its actual applications, which could be worked out to the first approximation, the theory fell far short of expectations. The Ramsauer effect, the most interesting phenomenon exhibited in the elastic scattering of electrons, could not be explained, and in the field of inelastic collisions, it failed to provide a means of explaining the excitation of levels of a term system which does not combine with the ground state system, e. g. , the excitation of the triplet lines of helium. These failures are, of course, failures of the theory in its first approximation. The first approximation in Born’s method of successive approximations neglected the disturbance of the electron waves by the field of the scatterer, and also the possibility of exchange of electrons between the atoms and the colliding beam. The neglect of both these effects becomes important for low velocity impacts, and it was clear that the Ramsauer effect, which is only observed for low velocity electrons, could only be explained by more accurate theory. The question was whether both effects, the distortion of the electron waves by the atomic field, and the exchange of electrons was important, or only one of them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document