AbstractLinear mixed models (LMMs) have become the standard approach for genetic association testing in the presence of sample structure. However, the performance of LMMs has primarily been evaluated in relatively homogeneous populations of European ancestry, despite many of the recent genetic association studies including samples from worldwide populations with diverse ancestries. In this paper, we demonstrate that existing LMM methods can have systematic miscalibration of association test statistics genome-wide in samples with heterogenous ancestry, resulting in both increased type-I error rates and a loss of power. Furthermore, we show that this miscalibration arises due to varying allele frequency differences across the genome among populations. To overcome this problem, we developed LMM-OPS, an LMM approach which orthogonally partitions diverse genetic structure into two components: distant population structure and recent genetic relatedness. In simulation studies with real and simulated genotype data, we demonstrate that LMM-OPS is appropriately calibrated in the presence of ancestry heterogeneity and outperforms existing LMM approaches, including EMMAX, GCTA, and GEMMA. We conduct a GWAS of white blood cell (WBC) count in an admixed sample of 3,551 Hispanic/Latino American women from the Women’s Health Initiative SNP Health Association Resource where LMM-OPS detects genome-wide significant associations with corresponding p-values that are one or more orders of magnitude smaller than those from competing LMM methods. We also identify a genome-wide significant association with regulatory variant rs2814778 in the DARC gene on chromosome 1, which generalizes to Hispanic/Latino Americans a previous association with reduced WBC count identified in African Americans.
The effects of human population structure on large genetic association studies
