scholarly journals Discordant American College of Physicians and international rheumatology guidelines for gout management: consensus statement of the Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN)

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 561-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Dalbeth ◽  
Thomas Bardin ◽  
Michael Doherty ◽  
Frédéric Lioté ◽  
Pascal Richette ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Bursill ◽  
William J. Taylor ◽  
Robert Terkeltaub ◽  
Masanari Kuwabara ◽  
Tony R. Merriman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
pp. 1592-1600 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Bursill ◽  
William J Taylor ◽  
Robert Terkeltaub ◽  
Abhishek Abhishek ◽  
Alexander K So ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThere is a lack of standardisation in the terminology used to describe gout. The aim of this project was to develop a consensus statement describing the recommended nomenclature for disease states of gout.MethodsA content analysis of gout-related articles from rheumatology and general internal medicine journals published over a 5-year period identified potential disease states and the labels commonly assigned to them. Based on these findings, experts in gout were invited to participate in a Delphi exercise and face-to-face consensus meeting to reach agreement on disease state labels and definitions.ResultsThe content analysis identified 13 unique disease states and a total of 63 unique labels. The Delphi exercise (n=76 respondents) and face-to-face meeting (n=35 attendees) established consensus agreement for eight disease state labels and definitions. The agreed labels were as follows: ‘asymptomatic hyperuricaemia’, ‘asymptomatic monosodium urate crystal deposition’, ‘asymptomatic hyperuricaemia with monosodium urate crystal deposition’, ‘gout’, ‘tophaceous gout’, ‘erosive gout’, ‘first gout flare’ and ‘recurrent gout flares’. There was consensus agreement that the label ‘gout’ should be restricted to current or prior clinically evident disease caused by monosodium urate crystal deposition (gout flare, chronic gouty arthritis or subcutaneous tophus).ConclusionConsensus agreement has been established for the labels and definitions of eight gout disease states, including ‘gout’ itself. The Gout, Hyperuricaemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network recommends the use of these labels when describing disease states of gout in research and clinical practice.


Author(s):  
Lisa K. Stamp ◽  
Hamish Farquhar ◽  
Huai Leng Pisaniello ◽  
Ana B. Vargas-Santos ◽  
Mark Fisher ◽  
...  

AbstractGout and chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently coexist, but quality evidence to guide gout management in people with CKD is lacking. Use of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in the context of advanced CKD varies greatly, and professional bodies have issued conflicting recommendations regarding the treatment of gout in people with concomitant CKD. As a result, confusion exists among medical professionals about the appropriate management of people with gout and CKD. This Consensus Statement from the Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) discusses the evidence and/or lack thereof for the management of gout in people with CKD and identifies key areas for research to address the challenges faced in the management of gout and CKD. These discussions, which address areas for research both in general as well as related to specific medications used to treat gout flares or as ULT, are supported by separately published G-CAN systematic literature reviews. This Consensus Statement is not intended as a guideline for the management of gout in CKD; rather, it analyses the available literature on the safety and efficacy of drugs used in gout management to identify important gaps in knowledge and associated areas for research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document