scholarly journals Free clear aligner webinars in 2022

BDJ ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 232 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-61
Keyword(s):  
BDJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 230 (7) ◽  
pp. 397-397
Author(s):  
Paul Hellyer
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1249-1254
Author(s):  
Long Qin ◽  
Qiao Wang ◽  
Dongliang Zhang ◽  
Xin He ◽  
Binbin Wu

The different positions and angles of attachment affecting the buccolingual movement of the maxillary molars, especially lingual tipping and negative torque movements, were biomechanically analyzed in order to determine how to better control and prevent unwanted movement of clear aligners. The aligner can be designed and placed appropriately to improve expected tooth movement. Based on mechanical principles, the force system of attachment was analyzed, and the optimum attachment position and angle for tipping and negative torque movement was determined. Attachment close to the enamel-cementum junction (ECJ) was found to achieve the best F (M/L) during negative torque movement; however, the angle should also be adjusted. Attachment close to the occlusal surface achieved greater tipping force at specific angles. When more tipping movement is required, it is recommended to place the attachment 3–5 mm from the ECJ. The angle of the attachment should be 110–120 degrees from the tooth surface. When place the attachment 4–5 mm from the ECJ, the angle of the attachment should be between 145 and 146.5 degrees.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Lione ◽  
Valeria Paoloni ◽  
Lorenzo Bartolommei ◽  
Francesca Gazzani ◽  
Simonetta Meuli ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate tooth movements during maxillary arch expansion with clear aligner treatment. Materials and Methods The study group included 28 subjects (16 females, 12 males, mean age 31.9 ± 5.4 years) collected prospectively from January 2018 to May 2019. Inclusion criteria were European ancestry, posterior transverse discrepancy of 3–6 mm, permanent dentition stage, presence of second permanent molars, mild or moderate crowding, and good compliance with aligners. Treatment protocol included nonextraction strategies, application of Invisalign clear aligner system, and no auxiliaries other than Invisalign attachments. Linear and angular measurements were performed before treatment (T1), at the end of treatment (T2), and on final virtual models (T2 ClinCheck). A paired t-test was used to compare T2-T1 and T2-T2 ClinCheck changes. The level of significance was set at 5%. Results Statistically significant differences were found for all measurements, except for ones at the upper second molars. The greatest increase in maxillary width was detected at the upper first and second premolars: +3.5 mm for the first premolar and +3.8 mm for the second premolar at T2. Comparison of T2-T1 angular outcomes showed statistically significant changes in the inclinations of all teeth except for the second permanent molars. T2-T2 ClinCheck showed significant differences for both linear and angular measurements for maxillary canines, resulting in poor predictability. Conclusions Maxillary arch development revealed a progressive reduction of the expansion rate and buccal tipping in the anterior, lateral, and posterior regions, with the greatest net increase at the first and second premolars. Clinical attention should be paid to maxillary canine movements, and overcorrection should be planned for them during dentoalveolar expansion.


Materials ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 533
Author(s):  
Riccardo Nucera ◽  
Carolina Dolci ◽  
Angela Mirea Bellocchio ◽  
Stefania Costa ◽  
Serena Barbera ◽  
...  

This systematic review aims to highlight the differences between different clear aligner therapies that differ in the presence of attachments or in attachment configuration. Eight electronic databases were searched up to March 2020. Two authors independently proceeded to study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. The analysis of the results was carried out examining six groups of movements (mesio-distal tipping/bodily movement; anterior bucco-lingual tipping/root torque; posterior bucco-lingual tipping/expansion; intrusion; extrusion; rotation). Five clinical trials were selected and all of them showed a medium risk of bias. Literature showed that attachments mostly increase the effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with clear aligners, improving anterior root torque, rotation, and mesio-distal (M-D) movement; they are also important to increase posterior anchorage. However, some articles showed contradictory or not statistically significant results. Attachments also seem to improve intrusion, but the evidence about this movement, as well as extrusion, is lacking. No studies evaluated posterior bucco-lingual tipping/expansion. Further clinical trials are strongly suggested to clarify the influence of attachments and their number, size, shape, and position on each orthodontic movement.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 120-131
Author(s):  
Lexie Y Lin ◽  
Chris H Chang ◽  
W. Eugene Roberts

Inadequate posterior anchorage is a serious limitation for aligner treatment involving extraction of four first premolars. Inappropriate axial inclinations may compromise intermaxillary occlusion and stability. OrthoBoneScrew® (OBS) anchorage is designed to augment the Invisalign® clear aligner G6 solution to produce more predictable outcomes as illustrated by the current case report. An 18-year-old female presented with two chief complains: (1) Protrusive, incompetent lips, and (2) excessive gingival exposure when smiling (“gummy smile”). Clinical evaluation revealed bimaxillary protrusion, hypermentalis activity, anterior crowding, and excessive anterior axial inclinations, particularly of the lower incisors (116°). The American Board of Orthodontic (ABO) discrepancy index (DI) was 21. The treatment plan was extraction of all four first premolars, and clear aligner (Invisalign®) therapy anchored with four OBSs: Infra-zygomatic crest (IZC), and between the roots of the upper central and lateral incisors (Incisal) bilaterally. Eighteen months of initial treatment with 45 aligners retracted and intruded the anterior segments in both arches by closing the extraction spaces with supplemental anchorage provided by IZC and Incisal OBSs. The final series of 20 refinement aligners achieved an excellent outcome as evidenced by an ABO cast-radiograph evaluation (CRE) score of 10, and a pink and white (P&W) dental esthetic score of 3. Post-treatment analysis revealed multiple opportunities for improvement. The patient was well satisfied with the final outcome.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalal Elmoutawakkil ◽  
Nabil Hacib

Advanced digital technology is rapidly changing the world, as well as transforming the dental profession. The adoption of digital technologies in dental offices allied with efficient processes and accurate high-strength materials are replacing conventional aligners workflows to improve overall patients’ experiences and outcomes. Various digital devices such as 3D printers, intraoral and face scanners, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), software for computer 3D ortho setup, and 3D printing provide new potential alternatives to replace the traditional outsourced workflow for aligners. With this new technology, the entire process for bringing clear aligner production in-office can significantly reduce laboratory bills and increase patient case acceptance to provide high-quality and customized aligner therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Robertson ◽  
Harsimrat Kaur ◽  
Nathalia Carolina Fernandes Fagundes ◽  
Dan Romanyk ◽  
Paul Major ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document