Disease modification is not all — we need symptomatic therapies for Alzheimer disease

Author(s):  
Jeffrey Cummings
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lon S Schneider ◽  
Yuqi Qiu ◽  
Ronald G Thomas ◽  
Carol Evans ◽  
Diane M. Jacobs ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted Alzheimer disease randomized clinical trials (RCTs)forcing investigators to make changes in the conduct of such trials while endeavoring to maintain their validity. Changing ongoing RCTs carries risks for biases and threats to validity. To understand the impact of exigent modifications due to COVID-19 we examined several scenarios in symptomatic and disease modification trials that could be made.MethodsWe identified both symptomatic and disease modification Alzheimer disease RCTs as exemplars of those that would be affected by the pandemic and considered the types of changes that sponsors could make to each. We modeled three scenarios for each of the types of trialsusing existing datasets, adjusting enrollment, follow-ups, and dropouts to examine the potential effects COVID-19-related changes.Simulations were performed that accounted for completion and dropout patterns using linear mixed effects models, modeling time as continuous and categorical. The statistical power of the scenarios was determined.ResultsTruncating both symptomatic and disease modification trials, led to underpowered trials.By contrast, adapting the trials byextending the treatment period, temporarily stopping treatment, delaying outcomes assessments, and performing remote assessment allowed for increased statistical power nearly to the level originally planned.DiscussionThese analyses support the idea that disrupted trials under common scenarios are better continued and extended even in the face of dropouts, treatment disruptions, missing outcomes, and other exigencies, and that adaptations can be made that maintain the trials validity. We suggest some adaptive methods to do this noting that some changes become under-powered to detect theoriginal effect sizes and expected outcomes. These analyses provide insight to better plan trials that are resilient to unexpected changes to the medical, social, and political milieu.


2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 1977-1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Deleye ◽  
Ann-Marie Waldron ◽  
Jeroen Verhaeghe ◽  
Astrid Bottelbergs ◽  
Leonie Wyffels ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lon S. Schneider ◽  
Yuqi Qiu ◽  
Ronald G. Thomas ◽  
Carol Evans ◽  
Diane M. Jacobs ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted Alzheimer disease randomized clinical trials (RCTs), forcing investigators to make changes in the conduct of such trials while endeavoring to maintain their validity. Changing ongoing RCTs carries risks for biases and threats to validity. To understand the impact of exigent modifications due to COVID-19, we examined several scenarios in symptomatic and disease modification trials that could be made. Methods We identified both symptomatic and disease modification Alzheimer disease RCTs as exemplars of those that would be affected by the pandemic and considered the types of changes that sponsors could make to each. We modeled three scenarios for each of the types of trials using existing datasets, adjusting enrollment, follow-ups, and dropouts to examine the potential effects COVID-19-related changes. Simulations were performed that accounted for completion and dropout patterns using linear mixed effects models, modeling time as continuous and categorical. The statistical power of the scenarios was determined. Results Truncating both symptomatic and disease modification trials led to underpowered trials. By contrast, adapting the trials by extending the treatment period, temporarily stopping treatment, delaying outcomes assessments, and performing remote assessment allowed for increased statistical power nearly to the level originally planned. Discussion These analyses support the idea that disrupted trials under common scenarios are better continued and extended even in the face of dropouts, treatment disruptions, missing outcomes, and other exigencies and that adaptations can be made that maintain the trials’ validity. We suggest some adaptive methods to do this noting that some changes become under-powered to detect the original effect sizes and expected outcomes. These analyses provide insight to better plan trials that are resilient to unexpected changes to the medical, social, and political milieu.


Author(s):  
K.S. Kosik ◽  
L.K. Duffy ◽  
S. Bakalis ◽  
C. Abraham ◽  
D.J. Selkoe

The major structural lesions of the human brain during aging and in Alzheimer disease (AD) are the neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) and the senile (neuritic) plaque. Although these fibrous alterations have been recognized by light microscopists for almost a century, detailed biochemical and morphological analysis of the lesions has been undertaken only recently. Because the intraneuronal deposits in the NFT and the plaque neurites and the extraneuronal amyloid cores of the plaques have a filamentous ultrastructure, the neuronal cytoskeleton has played a prominent role in most pathogenetic hypotheses.The approach of our laboratory toward elucidating the origin of plaques and tangles in AD has been two-fold: the use of analytical protein chemistry to purify and then characterize the pathological fibers comprising the tangles and plaques, and the use of certain monoclonal antibodies to neuronal cytoskeletal proteins that, despite high specificity, cross-react with NFT and thus implicate epitopes of these proteins as constituents of the tangles.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anya Mazur-Mosiewicz ◽  
Matthew J. Holcomb ◽  
Raymond S. Dean

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Khachaturian ◽  
P. Zandi ◽  
C. G. Lyketsos ◽  
K. M. Hayden ◽  
I. Skoog ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document