scholarly journals Short-Term Effects of Kinesio Taping in the Treatment of Latent and Active Upper Trapezius Trigger Points: two Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yolanda Noguera-Iturbe ◽  
Javier Martínez-Gramage ◽  
Francisco Javier Montañez-Aguilera ◽  
José Casaña ◽  
Juan Francisco Lisón
Keyword(s):  
Trapezius Muscle ◽  
Trigger Points ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Lateral Flexion ◽  
Group Factor ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Myofascial Trigger Points ◽  
Upper Trapezius ◽  
Upper Trapezius Muscle

Abstract The presence of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) is one of the most common causes of musculoskeletal problems and may lead to limited professional activity. Among the various treatment methods proposed for MTrPs, Kinesio Taping (KT) is a non-invasive, painless, and less time-consuming method with fewer side effects that has become widely used as a therapeutic tool in a variety of prevention and rehabilitation protocols. The aim of the study was to evaluate the immediate and short-term efficacy of the space correction KT technique in patients with latent or active MTrPs in the upper trapezius muscle. Two parallel randomized sham-controlled trials were simultaneously executed: in trial A, ninety-seven participants with latent MTrPs were randomly assigned to either the KT (n = 51) or sham (n = 46) group; in trial B, thirty-seven participants with active MTrPs were assigned to the KT (n = 20) or sham (n = 17) group. The primary outcome was pressure pain threshold (PPT) in the upper trapezius muscle, measured with algometry. Secondary outcomes included the active range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine (lateral flexion and rotation), measured with a cervical ROM goniometer. In each trial, two-way ANOVA tests were used to compare the study effects on the outcome measures between the groups, with time serving as the intra-group factor (baseline, immediately, and 72 h after the application) and the intervention type (KT and sham) as the between-group factor. At 72 h, participants receiving KT did not show significant differences in PPT (trial A: mean difference −1.8 N; 95% CI: [−8.1, 4.4], trial B: mean difference −1.2 N; 95% CI: [−7.4, 5.1]), cervical lateral flexion (trial A: mean difference 0.2 degrees; 95% CI: [−2.7, 3.1], trial B: mean difference −2.4 degrees; 95% CI: [−8.4, 3.6]), and cervical rotation (trial A: mean difference 3.7 degrees; 95% CI: [−0.1, 7.5], trial B: mean difference 1.4 degrees; 95% CI: [−5.7, 8.4]), compared to the sham groups. Thus, the results of this study do not support the use of the space correction KT technique to treat patients with latent or active myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle.

scholarly journals Effects of Conventional Physical Therapy with or without Strain Counterstrain in Patients with Trigger Points of Upper Trapezius; a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hafiz Muhammad Waseem Javaid ◽  
Ashfaq Ahmad ◽  
Fareeha Ajmad ◽  
Sidrah Liaqat ◽  
Saba Tahir
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Trapezius Muscle ◽  
Trigger Points ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Myofascial Trigger Points ◽  
Upper Trapezius ◽  
Group A ◽  
Upper Trapezius Muscle ◽  
Group B

<p><strong>Background:</strong><strong>  </strong>Non-specific neck pain has potential contributing factors. One of the factors being emphasized in the modern era is the Myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle. These could be treated by strain counterstrain method whose effectiveness needs to be evaluated. Hence, the objective of the study was to compare the effects of conventional Physical therapy with or without strain counterstrain in patients with trigger points of upper trapezius muscle.</p><p> <strong>Patients and Methods</strong></p><p>It is randomized controlled clinical trial.</p><p>48 patients with treatment group A (24 patients) and control group B (24 patients).</p><p class="Default">48 patients with treatment group A (24 patients) and control group B (24 patients).</p><p>Patients with non-specific neck pain, having active myofascial trigger points in upper trapezius muscle presented to physical therapy department. Effects of interventions were recorded on neck disability index, visual analogue scale and cervical range of motion goniometer.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> of this study using repeated measure ANOVA demonstrated that within group from day 1 to 7, there was mean reduction of pain by 32.13 (26.99, 37.27) in conventional physical therapy group with Strain counterstrain group (group A) and conventional physical therapy only group (group B) by 12.62 (8.28, 16.96). Less significant improvement was seen within groups for day 1, 4 and 7 in cervical range of motion. There was significant improvement seen in pain, neck disability index and neck range of motions on day 7 between group A and B measured by independent sample t test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong><strong>  </strong>Conventional physical therapy with strain counterstrain was found effective in reducing pain, functional disability and improving range of motion at cervical region.</p>

scholarly journals A Comparative Study on the Effects of Trigger Point Release vs Myofascial Release for Myofascial Trigger Points of Upper Trapezius in Smartphone Users

2021 ◽  
Vol SP (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali Suresh ◽  
Rama Chandra L. A. ◽  
Prasanna Mohan
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Trapezius Muscle ◽  
Trigger Points ◽  
The Body ◽  
Myofascial Trigger Points ◽  
Myofascial Release ◽  
Upper Trapezius ◽  
Upper Trapezius Muscle ◽  
Neck Disability

Background/aim: The increasing use of smartphone in daily life has brought about numerous musculoskeletal problems. Impairments in the neck is the most common when compared to other parts of the body. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different manual treatment techniques in two separate groups, i.e., trigger point release and Myofascial release (MFR) on the trigger points (TrPs) in the upper trapezius muscle in smartphone users. Both group received Ultrasound therapy. The smartphone addiction scale -short version was administered to all participants to determine the level of addiction and those who scores were high were included in the study. The set criteria in the study included the pain intensity on the visual analogue scale (VAS) neck disability using the Neck Disability Index and Cervical Range of motion side flexion using cervical goniometer. Subjects and methods: This clinical trial study assessed the outcome measures within and between groups before, after the intervention and a follow up was done after 15 days. The target population were smartphone users between the age group of 18 to 35 years. 106 subjects (48 males, 53 females) participants who had been selected from among the eligible participants of 176 and who had TrPs in their upper trapezius muscle. Results: The effect of Trigger point release and Myofascial release on patients of each groups with TrPs in the upper trapezius muscle resulted in increased cervical lateral flexion (P < 0.001), decreased pain intensity on VAS (P < 0.001) and decreased decrease in Neck disability (P < 0.001) within the groups and between the group there was no significance. Conclusion: Both manual techniques Trigger point release and Myofascial release reduced the symptoms of TrPs in the upper trapezius in both the groups equally, neither technique being superior to the other.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document