scholarly journals Author Correction: Different influences of facial attractiveness on judgments of moral beauty and moral goodness

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan Cui ◽  
Qiuping Cheng ◽  
Wuji Lin ◽  
Jiabao Lin ◽  
Lei Mo

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan Cui ◽  
Qiuping Cheng ◽  
Wuji Lin ◽  
Jiabao Lin ◽  
Lei Mo

Author(s):  
Qiuping Cheng ◽  
Zhili Han ◽  
Shun Liu ◽  
Yilong Kong ◽  
Xuchu Weng ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiuping Cheng ◽  
Zhili Han ◽  
Shun Liu ◽  
Yilong Kong ◽  
Xuchu Weng ◽  
...  

Abstract The judgments of moral goodness and moral beauty objectively refer to the perception and evaluation of moral traits, which are generally influenced by facial attractiveness. For centuries, people have equated beauty with the possession of positive qualities, but it is not clear whether the association between beauty and positive qualities exerts a similarly implicit influence on people`s responses to moral goodness and moral beauty, how it affects those responses, and what is the neural basis for such an effect. The present study is the first to examine the neural responses to facial attractiveness in the judgments of moral goodness and moral beauty. We found that beautiful faces in both moral judgments activated the left ventral occipitotemporal cortices sensitive to the geometric configuration of the faces, demonstrating that both moral goodness and moral beauty required the automatic visual analysis of geometrical configuration of attractive faces. In addition, compared to beautiful faces during moral goodness judgment, beautiful faces during moral beauty judgment induced unique activity in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex and midline cortical structures involved in the emotional-valenced information about attractive faces. The opposite comparison elicited specific activity in the left superior temporal cortex and premotor area, which play a critical role in the recognition of facial identity. Our results demonstrated that the neural responses to facial attractiveness in the process of higher order moral decision-makings exhibits both task-general and task-specific characteristics. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the essence of the relationship between morality and aesthetics.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dexian He ◽  
Clifford Ian Workman ◽  
Xianyou He ◽  
Anjan Chatterjee

A well-documented “beauty-is-good” stereotype is expressed in the expectation that physically attractive people have more positive characteristics. Recent evidence also finds that unattractive faces are associated with negative character inferences. Is what is good (bad) also beautiful (ugly)? Whether this conflation of aesthetic and moral values is bidirectional is not known. This study tested the hypothesis that complementary “good-is-beautiful” and “bad-is-ugly” stereotypes bias aesthetic judgments. Using highly controlled face stimuli, this pre-registered study examined whether moral character influences perceptions of attractiveness for different ages and sexes of faces. Compared to faces paired with non-moral vignettes, those paired with prosocial vignettes were rated significantly more attractive, confident, and friendlier. The opposite pattern characterized faces paired with antisocial vignettes. A significant interaction between vignette type and the age of the face was detected for attractiveness. Moral transgressions affected attractiveness more negatively for younger than older faces. Sex-related differences were not detected. These results suggest information about moral character affects our judgments about facial attractiveness. Better people are considered more attractive. These findings suggest that beliefs about moral goodness and physical beauty influence each other bidirectionally.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1726 ◽  
pp. 146534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiuping Cheng ◽  
Xuan Cui ◽  
Jiabao Lin ◽  
Xuchu Weng ◽  
Lei Mo

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-168
Author(s):  
Yanhui Xiang ◽  
Xue Wen ◽  
Jiaxu Zhao ◽  
Wenrui Zhang ◽  
Yiqi Jiang

2002 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Pansu ◽  
Michel Dubois

The aim of this study was to determine how facial attractiveness of applicants influences pre-selective evaluation in two different occupational fields (one relational and one non-relational). A total of 224 participants (working individuals and students) were asked to judge a fictitious applicant based on a resumé (applicant’s qualifications: highly vs. less qualified) and a photograph (attractive vs. unattractive). Overall, the results showed that facial-attractiveness effects on interpersonal judgments are not absolute, and that their occurrence partly depends on the situation in which the judgments are made. Regardless of occupational field, when the applicants were highly qualified (whether attractive or unattractive) they were systematically judged positively, whereas in the case of less qualified applicants, facial attractiveness differentially affected judgments in the two occupational fields: less-qualified but attractive applicants were only judged more favorably than less-qualified and unattractive ones when the job involved relational skills.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document