scholarly journals Long-term risk of primary liver cancers in entecavir versus tenofovir treatment for chronic hepatitis B

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Te-Sheng Chang ◽  
Yao-Hsu Yang ◽  
Wei-Ming Chen ◽  
Chien-Heng Shen ◽  
Shui-Yi Tung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis B ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Entire Population ◽  
Liver Cancers ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
Registry Database

AbstractIt remains controversial whether entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is associated with different clinical outcomes for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study aimed to compare the long-term risk of ETV versus TDF on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in CHB patients from a large multi-institutional database in Taiwan. From 2011 to 2018, a total of 21,222 CHB patients receiving ETV or TDF were screened for eligibility. Patients with coinfection, preexisting cancer and less than 6 months of follow-up were excluded. Finally, 7248 patients (5348 and 1900 in the ETV and TDF groups, respectively) were linked to the National Cancer Registry database for the development of HCC or ICC. Propensity score matching (PSM) (2:1) analysis was used to adjust for baseline differences. The HCC incidence between two groups was not different in the entire population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–1.02, p = 0.078) and in the PSM population (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.65–1.06, p = 0.129). Among decompensated cirrhotic patients, a lower risk of HCC was observed in TDF group than in ETV group (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.30–0.98, p = 0.043, PSM model). There were no differences between ETV and TDF groups in the ICC incidence (HR 1.84; 95% CI 0.54–6.29, p = 0.330 in the entire population and HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.31–3.52, p = 0.954 in the PSM population, respectively). In conclusion, treatment with ETV and TDF showed a comparable long-term risk of HCC and ICC in CHB patients.

Early HBeAg Loss During Peginterferon α-2b Therapy Predicts HBsAg Loss: Results of a Long-Term Follow-Up Study in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 104 (10) ◽  
pp. 2449-2457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik H C J Buster ◽  
Hajo J Flink ◽  
Halis Simsek ◽  
E Jenny Heathcote ◽  
Sachithanandan Sharmila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis B ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Hbsag Loss ◽  
Hbeag Loss ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Peginterferon Α

SHOULD CHRONIC HEPATITIS B BE TREATED AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE?

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Hulstaert ◽  
Christoph Schwierz ◽  
Frederik Nevens ◽  
Nancy Thiry ◽  
Mohamed Gamil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis B ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Multicenter Survey ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Objectives: We studied the cost-effectiveness of tenofovir and entecavir in e antigen positive (CHBe+) and negative (CHBe-) chronic hepatitis B.Methods: Using a multicenter survey including 544 patients we measured patient quality of life and attributable costs by clinical disease stage. Natural disease progression was studied in 278 patients in a single center. A Markov model was constructed to follow hypothetical cohorts of treated and untreated 40-year-old CHBe+ and CHBe- patients and 50-year-old patients with compensated cirrhosis.Results: We did not find an improvement in quality of life when viral load was reduced under treatment. Transition rates to liver cirrhosis were found to be age-dependent. Assuming equal effectiveness, tenofovir dominates the entecavir strategy because of its lower price in Belgium. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of tenofovir after 20 years is more favorable for treating Caucasian cirrhotic patients (mean ICER €29,000/quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]) compared with treating non-cirrhotic patients (mean ICER €110,000 and 131,000/QALY for CHB e+ and e-, respectively). Within the non-cirrhotic patients the ICER decreases with increasing cohort starting age from 30 to 50 years.Conclusions: Results of long-term models for tenofovir or entecavir treatment of CHB need to be interpreted with caution as long-term trials with hard end points are lacking. Especially the effect on HCC remains highly uncertain. Based on cost-effectiveness considerations such antiviral treatment should be targeted at patients with cirrhosis or at risk of rapid progression to this disease stage.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of HBsAg/anti-HBs double-positive versus HBsAg single-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Sun Kwak ◽  
Goh-Eun Chung ◽  
Jong In Yang ◽  
Jeong Yoon Yim
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis B ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Double Positive ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasonography ◽  
Hbsag Seroclearance

AbstractThe coexistence of HBsAg and anti-HBs has been reported in some chronic hepatitis B patients; however, the long-term outcomes of this serological profile have not been elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of HBsAg/anti-HBs double-positive chronic hepatitis B patients. Chronic hepatitis B patients who underwent baseline abdominal ultrasonography and follow-up (HBsAg/anti-HBs assessment and abdominal ultrasonography) at our healthcare center were included. The “coexistence group” included patients positive for both HBsAg and anti-HBs and the “control group” included patients positive for only HBsAg during follow-up. The outcomes were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence, HBsAg seroclearance and overall mortality. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed. Of the 2,341 eligible patients, 166 (7.1%) were in the coexistence group. The total follow-up duration was 5.4 years. The coexistence group had a 3.08-fold higher risk of HCC than the control group [hazard ratio (HR) 3.08, 95% confidence interval(CI) 1.26–7.55, P = 0.014] in multivariate analysis. The coexistence group had more HBsAg seroclearance than the control group (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.01–2.03, P = 0.046). However, overall mortality did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. The coexistence group is heterogeneous and includes subjects with unfavorable outcomes (incidence of HCC) and favorable outcomes (more HBsAg seroclearance).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document