Propensity score-adjusted analysis on stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone for ruptured intracranial aneurysms

AbstractStent-assisted coiling (SAC) for ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) remains controversial due to an inherent risk of potential thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. We compared SAC and coiling alone for the management of RIAs using propensity score-adjustment. Sixty-four patients treated by SAC and 220 by stand-alone coiling were retrospectively reviewed and compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with propensity scores. Functional outcome, procedure-related and overall complications and angiographic results were analyzed. Aneurysms treated by SAC had a larger diameter, a wider neck and were more frequently located at the posterior circulation. SAC had a higher risk for thromboembolic complications (17.2% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.025), however, this difference did not persist in the IPTW analysis (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.7–2.3, adjusted p = 0.458). In the adjusted analysis, rates of procedural cerebral infarction (p = 0.188), ventriculostomy-related hemorrhage (p = 0.584), in-hospital mortality (p = 0.786) and 6-month favorable functional outcome (p = 0.471) were not significantly different between the two groups. SAC yielded a higher complete occlusion (80.0% vs. 67.2%, OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.9–5.4, p < 0.001) and a lower recanalization rate (17.5% vs. 26.1%, OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2–0.6, p < 0.001) than stand-alone coiling at 6-month follow-up. In conclusion, SAC of large and wide-necked RIAs provided higher aneurysm occlusion and similar clinical outcome, when compared to stand-alone coiling.

Download Full-text

Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding

Journal of Neurosurgery ◽

10.3171/jns.1999.90.4.0656 ◽

1999 ◽

Vol 90 (4) ◽

pp. 656-663 ◽

Cited By ~ 335

Author(s):

James V. Byrne ◽

Min-Joo Sohn ◽

Andrew J. Molyneux

Keyword(s):

Coil Embolization ◽

Intracranial Aneurysms ◽

Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽

Content Type ◽

Aneurysm Embolization ◽

Aneurysm Occlusion ◽

The Stability ◽

Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms ◽

Fine Print

Object. During a 5-year period 317 patients presenting with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were successfully treated by coil embolization within 30 days of hemorrhage. The authors followed patients to assess the stability of aneurysm occlusion and its longer-term efficacy in protecting patients against rebleeding.Methods. Patients were followed for 6 to 65 months (median 22.3 months) by clinical review, angiography performed at 6 months posttreatment, and annual questionnaires. Stable angiographic occlusion was evident in 86.4% of small and 85.2% of large aneurysms with recurrent filling in 38 (14.7%) of 259 aneurysms. Rebleeding was caused by aneurysm recurrence in four patients (between 11 and 35 months posttreatment) and by rupture of a coincidental untreated aneurysm in one patient. Annual rebleeding rates were 0.8% in the 1st year, 0.6% in the 2nd year, and 2.4% in the 3rd year after aneurysm embolization, with no rebleeding in subsequent years. Rebleeding occurred in three (7.9%) of 38 recurrent aneurysms and in one (0.4%) of 221 aneurysms that appeared stable on angiography.Conclusions. Periodic follow-up angiography after coil embolization is recommended to identify aneurysm recurrence and those patients at a high risk of late rebleeding.

Download Full-text

‘Plug and pipe’ strategy for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014058 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

pp. 43-48 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Brian M Howard ◽

Jason M Frerich ◽

Thomas P Madaelil ◽

Jacques E Dion ◽

Frank C Tong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intracranial Aneurysms ◽

Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽

Aneurysm Rupture ◽

Acute Stage ◽

Flow Diversion ◽

Medical Illness ◽

Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm ◽

Aneurysm Occlusion ◽

Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

BackgroundAneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a potentially devastating condition, and among the first priorities of treatment is aneurysm occlusion to prevent re-hemorrhage. An emerging strategy to treat patients whose aneurysms are not ideal for surgical or endovascular treatment is subtotal coiling followed by flow diversion in the recovery phase or ‘plug and pipe’. However, data regarding the safety and efficacy of this strategy are lacking.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ‘plug and pipe’. All patients with a ruptured intracranial aneurysm intentionally, subtotally treated by coiling in the acute stage followed by flow diversion after recovery, were included. The primary outcome was re-hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes included aneurysm occlusion and functional status. Complications were reviewed.Results22 patients were included. No patient suffered a re-hemorrhage, either in the interval between coiling and flow diversion or in follow-up. The median interval between aneurysm rupture and flow diversion was 3.5 months. Roy–Raymond (R-R) class I or II occlusion was achieved in 91% of target aneurysms at the last imaging follow-up (15/22(68%) R-R 1 and 5/22(23%) R-R 2). Complications occurred in 2 (9%) patients, 1 of which was neurological.ConclusionsOverall, these data suggest that subtotal coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms followed by planned flow diversion is both safe and effective. Patients who may most benefit from ‘plug and pipe’ are those with aneurysms that confer high operative risk and those whose severity of medical illness increases the risk of microsurgical clip ligation.

Download Full-text

Safety and efficacy of the Derivo Embolization Device for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014166 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 11 (3) ◽

pp. 290-295 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Lukas Goertz ◽

Franziska Dorn ◽

Bastian Kraus ◽

Jan Borggrefe ◽

Marc Schlamann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intracranial Aneurysms ◽

Flow Diverter ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Aspiration Thrombectomy ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Posterior Circulation Aneurysms ◽

Aneurysm Morphology ◽

Aneurysm Occlusion ◽

Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

BackgroundThe Derivo Embolization Device (DED) is a novel flow diverter with advanced X-ray visibility, potentially lower thrombogenicity, and an improved delivery system.ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of the DED for emergency treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.MethodsBetween February 2016 and March 2018, 10 patients (median age 54.5 years, seven women) with 11 aneurysms were treated with the DED at three neurovascular centers. Procedural details, complications, morbidity, and aneurysm occlusion (O’Kelly-Marotta scale, OKM) were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsAmong 11 aneurysms treated, there were nine anterior circulation and two posterior circulation aneurysms. Aneurysm morphology was saccular in four cases, dissecting in three, blister-like in three, and fusiform in one. In each case, a single DED was implanted and deployment was technically successful without exception. Adjunctive coiling was performed in two aneurysms. We observed one in-stent thrombosis, presumably due to low response to clopidogrel 4 days after the procedure, which remained with a mild hemiparesis after aspiration thrombectomy. No further thromboembolic or hemorrhagic events occurred. Favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale score ≤2) at last follow-up was achieved in all patients. Among 10 aneurysms available for angiographic follow-up, complete aneurysm occlusion (OKM D) was obtained in nine cases (90.0%).ConclusionsIn this pilot study, endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the DED was feasible and not associated with any incidence of rebleeding. Larger series with longer follow-up are warranted to reach a definite conclusion about this device.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Low-Profiled Visualized Intraluminal Support Stent-Assisted Coiling and Coiling Only for Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Safety and Efficacy Based on a Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/neuros/nyaa110 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 87 (3) ◽

pp. 584-591 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Gaici Xue ◽

Qiao Zuo ◽

Haishuang Tang ◽

Xiaoxi Zhang ◽

Guoli Duan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Propensity Score ◽

Intracranial Aneurysms ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Related Complication ◽

Recurrence Rates ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Complete Occlusion ◽

Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

Abstract BACKGROUND Low-profiled visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) is suggested as a promising stent for complex intracranial aneurysms. However, the safety and efficacy of LVIS-assisted coiling of acutely ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms have not been well reported. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of LVIS-assisted coiling of acutely ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms compared with contemporary coiling-only strategy via propensity score matching in a high-volume center. METHODS A retrospective review of patients with acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms who underwent LVIS stent placement or coiling only from November 2013 to October 2017 was performed. Perioperative procedure-related complications and clinical and angiographic follow-up outcomes were compared. RESULTS All baseline characteristics were equivalent between the 2 groups except for neck size. The immediate angiographic results, procedure-related complications, procedure-related mortality, and clinical outcomes between the 2 groups demonstrated no significant differences (P = .087, P = .207, P = .685, and P = .865, respectively). The angiographic follow-up outcomes of the LVIS-assisted coiling group showed a significantly higher complete occlusion rate and lower recurrence rate compared with the coiling-only group (92.3% vs 59.9%, 4.8% vs 26.1%, P < .001). Multivariable analysis showed no significant predictors for the overall perioperative procedure-related complications, hemorrhagic complications, and ischemic complications. CONCLUSION The LVIS stent is a safe and effective device for stent-assisted coiling of acutely ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms, with comparable procedure-related complication rates, higher complete occlusion rates, and lower recurrence rates at follow-up compared with coiling only.

Download Full-text

Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding

Neurosurgical FOCUS ◽

10.3171/foc.1999.6.2.2 ◽

1999 ◽

Vol 6 (2) ◽

pp. E2

Author(s):

James V. Byrne ◽

Min-Joo Sohn ◽

Andrew J. Molyneux ◽

B. Chir

Keyword(s):

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽

High Risk ◽

Coil Embolization ◽

Intracranial Aneurysms ◽

Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽

Aneurysm Embolization ◽

Aneurysm Occlusion ◽

The Stability ◽

Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

Object During a 5-year period 317 patients presenting with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were successfully treated by coil embolization within 30 days of hemorrhage. The authors followed these cases to assess the stability of aneurysm occlusion and its longer-term efficacy in protecting patients against rebleeding. Methods These cases were followed for 6 to 65 months (median 22.3 months) by clinical review, angiography performed at 6 months posttreatment, and annual postal questionnaires. Conclusions Stable angiographic occlusion was evident in 86.4% of small and 85.2% of large aneurysms with recurrent filling in 38 (14.7%) of 259 aneurysms. Rebleeding was caused by aneurysm recurrence in four patients (between 11 and 35 months posttreatment) and by rupture of a coincidental untreated aneurysm in one patient. Annual rebleeding rates were 0.8% in the 1st year, 0.6% in the 2nd year, and 2.4% in the 3rd year after aneurysm embolization, with no rebleeding in subsequent years. Rebleeding occurred in three (7.9%) of 38 recurrent aneurysms and in one (0.4%) of 221 aneurysms that appeared stable on angiography. Periodic follow-up angiography after coil embolization is recommended to identify aneurysm recurrence and those patients at a high risk of late rebleeding.

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.14584.472091 ◽

2006 ◽

Author(s):

Luciana Mascia

Keyword(s):

Intracranial Aneurysms ◽

Endovascular Coiling ◽

International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial ◽

Aneurysm Occlusion ◽

Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

Download Full-text

125 Staged Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Acute Coiling Followed By Delayed Flow Diversion

Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/neuros/nyx417.125 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 64 (CN_suppl_1) ◽

pp. 228-228

Author(s):

Erick Michael Westbroek ◽

Matthew Bender ◽

Narlin B Beaty ◽

Bowen Jiang ◽

Risheng Xu AB ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Complication Rate ◽

Coil Embolization ◽

Intracranial Aneurysms ◽

Major Complication ◽

Flow Diversion ◽

Neurological Deficits ◽

Major Complication Rate ◽

Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

Abstract INTRODUCTION ISAT demonstrated that coiling is effective for aneurysm treatment in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH); however, complete occlusion of wide-necked aneurysms frequently requires adjuvants relatively contraindicated in SAH. As such, a limited “dome occlusive” strategy is often pursued in the setting of SAH. We report a single institution series of coiling of acutely ruptured aneurysms followed by delayed flow diversion for definitive, curative occlusion. METHODS A prospectively collected IRB-approved database was screened for patients with aneurysmal SAH who were initially treated by coil embolization followed by planned flow diversion at a single academic medical institution. Peri-procedural outcomes, complications, and angiographic follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS >50 patients underwent both acute coiling followed by delayed, planned flow diversion. Average aneurysm size on initial presentation was 9.5 mm. Common aneurysm locations included Pcomm (36%), Acomm (30%), MCA (10%), ACA (10%), and vertebral (5%). Dome occlusion was achieved in all cases following initial coiling. Second-stage implantation of a flow diverting stent was achieved in 49/50 cases (98%). Follow-up angiography was available for 33/50 patients (66%), with mean follow-up of 11 months. 27 patients (82%) had complete angiographic occlusion at last follow up. All patients with residual filling at follow-up still had dome occlusion. There were no mortalities (0%). Major complication rate for stage I coiling was 2% (1 patient with intra-procedural aneurysm re-rupture causing increase in a previous ICH). Major complication rate for stage 2 flow diversion was 2% (1 patient with ischemic stroke following noncompliance with dual antiplatelet regimen). Minor complications occurred in 2 additional patients (4%) with transient neurological deficits. CONCLUSION Staged endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with acute dome-occlusive coil embolization followed by delayed flow diversion is a safe and effective treatment strategy.

Download Full-text

Flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review

Interventional Neuroradiology ◽

10.1177/15910199211027991 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 159101992110279

Author(s):

Muhammad Waqas ◽

Rimal H Dossani ◽

Modhi Alkhaldi ◽

Jocelyn Neveu ◽

Justin M Cappuzzo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Intracranial Aneurysms ◽

Flow Diverter ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Mesh Terms ◽

Aneurysm Occlusion ◽

Occlusion Rate ◽

Layered Flow ◽

Comparative Safety

Introduction The Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED; MicroVention) is a dual-layered flow diverter used for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The objective of this systematic review was to compile device-related safety and effectiveness data. Methods The literature from January 1, 2013 to April 30, 2021 was searched for studies describing use of the FRED for intracranial aneurysm treatment irrespective of aneurysm location and morphology. The review included anterior and posterior circulation ruptured and unruptured saccular, fusiform or dissection, and blister aneurysms. MeSH terms related to “flow re-direction endoluminal device” and “FRED for aneurysms” were used. Data related to indication, complications, and rates of aneurysm occlusion were retrieved and analyzed. Results Twenty-two studies with 1729 intracranial aneurysms were included in this review. Overall reported morbidity was 3.9% (range 0–20%). Overall procedure-related mortality was 1.4% (range 0–6%). Complication rates fell into 5 categories: technical (3.6%), ischemic (3.8%), thrombotic or stenotic (6%), hemorrhagic (1.5%), and non-neurological (0.8%). The aneurysm occlusion rate between 0 and 3 months (reported in 11 studies) was 47.8%. The occlusion rate between 4 and 6 months (reported in 14 studies) was 73.8%. Occlusion rates continued to increase to 75.1% at 7–12 months (reported in 10 studies) and 86.6% for follow-up beyond 1 year (reported in 10 studies). Conclusion This review indicated that the FRED is a safe and effective for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Future studies should directly compare the FRED with other flow diverters for a better understanding of comparative safety and effectiveness among the different devices.

Download Full-text