scholarly journals Chemical cues that attract cannibalistic cane toad (Rhinella marina) larvae to vulnerable embryos

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Crossland ◽  
Angela A. Salim ◽  
Robert J. Capon ◽  
Richard Shine

AbstractChemical cues produced by late-stage embryos of the cane toad (Rhinella marina) attract older conspecific larvae, which are highly cannibalistic and can consume an entire clutch. To clarify the molecular basis of this attraction response, we presented captive tadpoles with components present in toad eggs. As previously reported, attractivity arises from the distinctive toxins (bufadienolides) produced by cane toads, with some toxins (e.g., bufagenins) much stronger attractants than others (e.g., bufotoxins). Extracts of frozen toad parotoid glands (rich in bufagenins) were more attractive than were fresh MeOH extracts of the parotoid secretion (rich in bufotoxins), and purified marinobufagin was more effective than marinobufotoxin. Cardenolide aglycones (e.g., digitoxigenin) were active attractors, whereas C-3 glycosides (e.g., digoxin, oubain) were far less effective. A structure–activity relationship study revealed that tadpole attractant potency strongly correlated with Na+/K+ ATPase inhibitory activity, suggesting that tadpoles monitor and rapidly react to perturbations to Na+/K+ ATPase activity.

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Crossland ◽  
Richard Shine

Adaptations to suppress the viability of conspecifics may provide novel ways to control invasive taxa. The spread of cane toads ( Rhinella marina ) through tropical Australia has had severe ecological impacts, stimulating a search for biocontrol. Our experiments show that cane toad tadpoles produce waterborne chemical cues that suppress the viability of conspecifics encountering those cues during embryonic development. Brief (72 h) exposure to these cues in the egg and post-hatching phases massively reduced rates of survival and growth of larvae. Body sizes at metamorphosis (about three weeks later) were almost twice as great in control larvae as in tadpole-exposed larvae. The waterborne cue responsible for these effects might provide a weapon to reduce toad recruitment within the species' invaded range.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document