scholarly journals Fractionated deep-inspiration breath-hold ZTE Compared with Free-breathing four-dimensional ZTE for detecting pulmonary nodules in oncological patients underwent PET/MRI

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Yung Chang ◽  
Tse-Hao Lee ◽  
Ren-Shyan Liu ◽  
Chien-Ying Li ◽  
Bang-Hung Yang ◽  
...  

AbstractThe zero echo time (ZTE) technique has improved the detection of lung nodules in PET/MRI but respiratory motion remains a challenge in lung scan. We investigated the feasibility and performance of fractionated deep-inspiration breath-hold (FDIBH) three-dimensional (3D) ZTE FDG PET/MRI for assessing lung nodules in patients with proved malignancy. Sixty patients who had undergone ZTE FDG PET/MRI and chest CT within a three-day interval were retrospectively included. Lung nodules less than 2 mm were excluded for analysis. Two physicians checked the adequacy of FDIBH ZTE and compared the lung nodule detection rates of FDIBH 3D ZTE and free-breathing (FB) four-dimensional (4D) ZTE, with chest CT as the reference standard. FDIBH resolved the effect of respiratory motion in 49 patients. The mean number and size of the pulmonary nodules identified in CT were 15 ± 31.3 per patient and 5.9 ± 4.6 mm in diameter. The overall nodule detection rate was 71% for FDIBH 3D ZTE and 70% for FB 4D ZTE (p = 0.73). FDIBH 3D ZTE significantly outperformed FB 4DZTE in detecting lung base nodules (72% and 68%; p = 0.03), especially for detecting those less than 6 mm (61% and 55%; p = 0.03). High inter-rater reliability for FDIBH 3D ZTE and FB 4D ZTE (k = 0.9 and 0.92) was noted. In conclusion, the capability of FDIBH 3D ZTE in respiratory motion resolution was limited with a technical failure rate of 18%. However, it could provide full expansion of the lung in a shorter scan time which enabled better detection of nodules (< 6 mm) in basal lungs, compared to FB 4D ZTE.

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeki Nagamachi ◽  
Hideyuki Wakamatsu ◽  
Shogo Kiyohara ◽  
Seigo Fujita ◽  
Shigemi Futami ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 286 (1) ◽  
pp. 260-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Balamoutoff ◽  
Benjamin Serrano ◽  
Florent Hugonnet ◽  
Nicolas Garnier ◽  
Benoît Paulmier ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Anni Young Lundgaard ◽  
Danijela Dejanovic ◽  
Anne Kiil Berthelsen ◽  
Flemming Littrup Andersen ◽  
Laura Ann Rechner ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. S710
Author(s):  
M. Swimberge ◽  
V. Remouchamps ◽  
L. Veldeman ◽  
T. Mulliez ◽  
B. Speelers ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiation dose to organs at risk for deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and free-breathing (FB) radiotherapy in patients with lef-sided breast cancer undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy after partial mastectomy. Methods: One hundred patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent DIBH and FB planning computed tomography scans, and the 2 techniques were compared. Dose-volume histograms were analyzed for heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and left lung. Results: Radiation dose to heart, LAD, and left lung was significantly lower for DIBH than for free breathing plans. The median mean heart dose for DIBH technique in comparison with FB was 1.21 Gy, and 3.22 Gy respectively; for LAD, 4.67 versus 24.71 Gy; and for left lung 8.32 Gy versus 9.99 Gy. Conclusion: DIBH is an effective technique to reduce cardiac and lung radiation exposure.


2021 ◽  
pp. 20210295
Author(s):  
Christina Schröder ◽  
Sebastian Kirschke ◽  
Eyck Blank ◽  
Sophia Rohrberg ◽  
Robert Förster ◽  
...  

Objective: To prospectively analyze the feasibility of an algorithm for patient preparation, treatment planning and selection for deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) treatment of left-sided breast cancer. Methods: From 02/2017 to 07/2019, 135 patients with left-sided breast cancer were selected and prepared for radiotherapy in DIBH. 99 received radiotherapy for the breast alone and 36 for the breast including the lymphatic drainage (RNI). Treatment plans DIBH and free breathing (FB) were calculated. Dosimetrical analyses were performed and criteria were defined to assess whether a patient would dosimetrically profit from DIBH. Results: Of the 135 patients, 97 received a DIBH planning CT and 72 were selected for treatment in DIBH according to predefined criteria. When using DIBH there was a mean reduction of the DmeanHeart of 2.8 Gy and DmeanLAD of 4.2 Gy. seven patients did not benefit from DIBH regarding DmeanHeart, 23 regarding DmeanLAD. For the left lung the V20Gy was reduced by 4.9%, the V30Gy by 2.7% with 15 and 29 patients not benefitting from DIBH, respectively. In the 25 patients treated in FB, the benefit of DIBH would have been lower than for patients treated with DIBH (ΔDmeanHeart0.7 Gy vs 3.4 Gy). Conclusion: Dosimetrically, DIBH is no “one fits all” approach. However, there is a statistically significant benefit when looking at a larger patient population. DIBH should be used for treatment of left-sided breast cancer in patients fit for DIBH. Advances in knowledge: This analysis offers a well-designed dosimetrical analysis in patients treated with DIBH radiotherapy in an “every day” cohort.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document