Emergency CT misdiagnosis in acute aortic syndrome

Objectives: This cross-sectional study assessed the accuracy of emergency CT reports at presentation in acute aortic syndrome (AAS). Methods: Retrospective identification of cases of AAS presenting within a large health board with three acute hospitals receiving adult patients between January 2013 and December 2016. CT studies and reports at presentation were reviewed for discrepancies related to diagnosis, complications and classification by two cardiovascular radiologists. The specialist interest of the original reporters, clinically suspected diagnosis at referral for CT and technical adequacy of the scans were also assessed. False-positive diagnoses were identified and evaluated separately. Results: Among 88 consecutive confirmed cases of AAS at least one discrepancy was identified in 31% (n = 27), including failure to identify or misinterpretation of the AAS itself in 15% (n = 13), haemorrhage in 13% (n = 11), branch involvement in 9% (n = 8), and misclassification in 3% (n = 3). All discrepancies occurred among the 80% (n = 70) of cases reported by radiologists without specialist cardiovascular interest. 26% (n = 23/88) of AAS cases were not clinically suspected at referral for CT and although this was associated with suboptimal protocols, only 51% of CT scans among suspected cases were technically adequate. Seven false-positive diagnoses were identified, three of which related to motion artefact. Conclusion: Significant discrepancies are common in the emergency CT assessment of positive cases AAS and this study highlights important pitfalls in CT technique and interpretation. The absence of discrepancies among radiologists with specialist cardiovascular interest suggests both suspected and confirmed cases warrant urgent specialist review. Advances in knowledge: CT angiography is central to the diagnosis of AAS; however, significant radiology discrepancies are common among non-specialists. This study highlights important pitfalls in both CT technique as well as interpretation and supports routine specialist cardiovascular imaging input in the emergency assessment of AAS.

Virtual monoenergetic dual-energy CT reconstructions at 80 keV are optimal non-contrast CT technique for early stroke detection

Background Virtual monoenergetic (VM) dual-energy computed tomography (DE-CT) enables grey-to-white matter contrast-to-noise ratio optimization, potentially increasing ischaemic brain oedema visibility. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of VM and standard DE-CT reconstructions for early stroke detection. Methods Consecutive patients with non-contrast DE-CT of the brain scanned within 12 h of stroke symptom onset were prospectively included in the study. Patients with other significant brain pathology were excluded. Two radiologists jointly evaluated standard and VM reconstructions (from 40 to 190 keV at increments of 10 keV) for early stroke signs on a four-point Likert scale: (a) stroke definitely present, (b) stroke probably present, (c) probably no stroke, and (d) definitely no stroke. Follow-up imaging and clinical data served as the standard of reference. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results Stroke incidence among 184 patients was 76%. In 64 patients follow-up imaging served as the standard of reference: ischemic brain oedema detection was significantly more accurate on VM reconstructions at 80 keV compared with standard DE-CT reconstructions (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.821 vs. AUC = 0.672, p = 0.002). The difference was most prominent within the first 3 h after symptom onset (at 11%, AUC = 0.819 vs. AUC = 0.709, p = 0.17) and in patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale above 16 (at 37.5%, AUC = 1 vs. AUC = 0.625, p = 0.14). Conclusion VM DE-CT reconstructions at 80 keV appear to be the optimal non-contrast CT technique for diagnosing early ischaemic stroke, particularly within the first 3 h after symptom onset and in severely ill patients.

Combining perfusion and angiography with a low-dose cardiac CT technique: a preliminary investigation in a swine model

Morphological and physiological assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) is necessary for proper stratification of CAD risk. The objective was to evaluate a low-dose cardiac CT technique that combines morphological and physiological assessment of CAD. The low-dose technique was evaluated in twelve swine, where three of the twelve had coronary balloon stenosis. The technique consisted of rest perfusion measurement combined with angiography followed by stress perfusion measurement, where the ratio of stress to rest was used to derive coronary flow reserve (CFR). The technique only required two volume scans for perfusion measurement in mL/min/g; hence, four volume scans were acquired in total; two for rest with angiography and two for stress. All rest, stress, and CFR measurements were compared to a previously validated reference technique that employed 20 consecutive volume scans for rest perfusion measurement combined with angiography, and stress perfusion measurement, respectively. The 32 cm diameter volumetric CT dose index ($${\text{CTDI}}_{\text{vol}}^{32}$$ CTDI vol 32 ) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) of the low-dose technique were also recorded. All low-dose perfusion measurements (PLOW) in mL/min/g were related to reference perfusion measurements (PREF) through regression by PLOW = 1.04 PREF − 0.08 (r = 0.94, RMSE = 0.32 mL/min/g). The $${\text{CTDI}}_{\text{vol}}^{32}$$ CTDI vol 32 and SSDE of the low-dose cardiac CT technique were 8.05 mGy and 12.80 mGy respectively, corresponding to an estimated effective dose and size-specific effective dose of 1.8 and 2.87 mSv, respectively. Combined morphological and physiological assessment of coronary artery disease is feasible using a low-dose cardiac CT technique.