scholarly journals Cervical spinal cord atrophy associated with spina bifida

Spinal Cord ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 262-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Seichi ◽  
Y Hoshino ◽  
S Ikegawa ◽  
T Tanaka ◽  
Y Yanagisako ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burcu Zeydan ◽  
Xinyi Gu ◽  
Elizabeth J. Atkinson ◽  
B. Mark Keegan ◽  
Brian G. Weinshenker ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo assess whether cervical spinal cord atrophy heralds the onset of progressive MS.MethodsWe studied 34 individuals with radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) and 31 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) age matched to 25 patients within a year of onset of secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Two raters independently measured (twice per rater) the cervical spinal cord average segmental area (CASA) (mm2) of axial T2-weighted images between C2 and C7 landmarks. The midsagittal T2-weighted image from the end of C2 to the end of C7 vertebra was used to measure the cervical spine (c-spine) length (mm). Sex, age at cervical MRI, number and location of cervical spinal cord lesions, c-spine length, and diagnoses were analyzed against the outcome measures of CASA and C2 and C7 slice segmental areas.ResultsIntrarater and interrater agreement was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.97). The CASA area (p = 0.03) and C7 area (p = 0.002) were smaller in SPMS compared with RRMS. The C2 area (p = 0.027), CASA (p = 0.004), and C7 area (p = 0.003) were smaller in SPMS compared with RIS. The C2 area did not differ between SPMS and RRMS (p = 0.09). The C2 area (p = 0.349), CASA (p = 0.136), and C7 area (p = 0.228) did not differ between RIS and MS (SPMS and RRMS combined). In the multivariable model, ≥2 cervical spinal cord lesions were associated with the C2 area (p = 0.008), CASA (p = 0.009), and C7 area independent of disease course (p = 0.017). Progressive disease course was associated with the C7 area independent of the cervical spinal cord lesion number (p = 0.004).ConclusionCervical spinal cord atrophy is evident at the onset of progressive MS and seems partially independent of the number of cervical spinal cord lesions.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that MRI cervical spinal cord atrophy distinguishes patients at the onset of progressive MS from those with RIS and RRMS.


2001 ◽  
Vol 248 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérôme de Seze ◽  
Tanya Stojkovic ◽  
Jean-Yves Gauvrit ◽  
David Devos ◽  
Mohamed Ayachi ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e0152439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed-Mounir El Mendili ◽  
Timothée Lenglet ◽  
Tanya Stojkovic ◽  
Anthony Behin ◽  
Raquel Guimarães-Costa ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 261 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Bede ◽  
Ronan Walsh ◽  
Andrew J. Fagan ◽  
Orla Hardiman

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 205521732110707
Author(s):  
Kamyar Taheri ◽  
Irene M Vavasour ◽  
Shawna Abel ◽  
Lisa Eunyoung Lee ◽  
Poljanka Johnson ◽  
...  

Background Spinal cord atrophy provides a clinically relevant metric for monitoring MS. However, the spinal cord is imaged far less frequently than brain due to artefacts and acquisition time, whereas MRI of the brain is routinely performed. Objective To validate spinal cord cross-sectional area measurements from routine 3DT1 whole-brain MRI versus those from dedicated cord MRI in healthy controls and people with MS. Methods We calculated cross-sectional area at C1 and C2/3 using T2*-weighted spinal cord images and 3DT1 brain images, for 28 healthy controls and 73 people with MS. Correlations for both groups were assessed between: (1) C1 and C2/3 using cord images; (2) C1 from brain and C1 from cord; and (3) C1 from brain and C2/3 from cord. Results and Conclusion C1 and C2/3 from cord were strongly correlated in controls ( r = 0.94, p<0.0001) and MS ( r = 0.85, p<0.0001). There was strong agreement between C1 from brain and C2/3 from cord in controls ( r = 0.84, p<0.0001) and MS ( r = 0.81, p<0.0001). This supports the use of C1 cross-sectional area calculated from brain imaging as a surrogate for the traditional C2/3 cross-sectional area measure for spinal cord atrophy.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandrine Bedard ◽  
Julien Cohen-Adad

Spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA) is a relevant biomarker to assess spinal cord atrophy in various neurodegenerative diseases. However, the considerable inter-subject variability among healthy participants currently limits its usage. Previous studies explored factors contributing to the variability, yet the normalization models were based on a relatively limited number of participants (typically < 300 participants), required manual intervention, and were not implemented in an open-access comprehensive analysis pipeline. Another limitation is related to the imprecise prediction of the spinal levels when using vertebral levels as a reference; a question never addressed before in the search for a normalization method. In this study we implemented a method to measure CSA automatically from a spatial reference based on the central nervous system (the pontomedullary junction, PMJ), we investigated various factors to explain variability, and we developed normalization strategies on a large cohort (N=804). Cervical spinal cord CSA was computed on T1w MRI scans for 804 participants from the UK Biobank database. In addition to computing cross-sectional at the C2-C3 vertebral disc, it was also measured at 64 mm caudal from the PMJ. The effect of various biological, demographic and anatomical factors was explored by computing Pearson's correlation coefficients. A stepwise linear regression found significant predictors; the coefficients of the best fit model were used to normalize CSA. The correlation between CSA measured at C2-C3 and using the PMJ was y = 0.98x + 1.78 (R2 = 0.97). The best normalization model included thalamus volume, brain volume, sex and interaction between brain volume and sex. With this model, the coefficient of variation went down from 10.09% (without normalization) to 8.59%, a reduction of 14.85%. In this study we identified factors explaining inter-subject variability of spinal cord CSA over a large cohort of participants, and developed a normalization model to reduce the variability. We implemented an approach, based on the PMJ, to measure CSA to overcome limitations associated with the vertebral reference. This approach warrants further validation, especially in longitudinal cohorts. The PMJ-based method and normalization models are readily available in the Spinal Cord Toolbox.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document