scholarly journals Metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma to the orbit diagnosed by prostate-specific antigen staining

Eye ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 320-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
K-L Peng ◽  
S-C Kao ◽  
C-F Yang ◽  
H-C Kau ◽  
C-C Tsai ◽  
...  
1990 ◽  
Vol 144 (2 Part 1) ◽  
pp. 303-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ofer Nativ ◽  
Robert P. Myers ◽  
George M. Farrow ◽  
Terry M. Therneau ◽  
Horst Zincke ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 144 (suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A060-A060
Author(s):  
Vinita Mathur ◽  
Richard Roberts ◽  
Mohit Mathur ◽  
Michael Reeve ◽  
David Okrongly

1990 ◽  
Vol 65 (8) ◽  
pp. 1118-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
LESLIE M. RAINWATER ◽  
WILLIAM R. MORGAN ◽  
GEORGE G. KLEE ◽  
HORST ZINCKE

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. A646-A650
Author(s):  
Mohanrao Nandam ◽  
Vissa Shanthi ◽  
Bhavana Grandhi ◽  
SyamaSundara RaoByna ◽  
Vijaya Lakshmi Muramreddy ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 130 (6) ◽  
pp. 805-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang-Qian Xiao ◽  
David E. Burstein ◽  
Lorraine K. Miller ◽  
Pamela D. Unger

Abstract Context.—Nephrogenic adenoma is a rare benign lesion of the urinary tract. Owing to its strong association with a history of urinary tract irritation, nephrogenic adenoma was initially thought to originate from urothelial metaplasia; however, no solid proof of this association has been found. More recent investigation has pointed to a renal tubular cause. In addition to its uncertain origin, there can be diagnostic difficulty in distinguishing nephrogenic adenoma from prostatic carcinoma, particularly when dealing with lesions from the prostatic urethra. Objective.—To elucidate a possible histogenic relationship between nephrogenic adenoma and renal tubules, and also to evaluate the role of immunohistochemistry in the diagnostic distinction between nephrogenic adenoma and prostate carcinoma. Design.—Immunohistochemical studies were performed for P504S, prostate-specific antigen, CD10, p63, and epithelial membrane antigen on 9 cases of nephrogenic adenoma, 10 cases of normal renal parenchyma, and 10 cases of prostatic tissue, both benign and malignant. Results.—Nephrogenic adenoma shares the same immunohistochemical profile as distal renal tubules: both are positive for P504S and epithelial membrane antigen and negative for p63, CD10, and prostate-specific antigen. Prostatic adenocarcinoma tissue was positive for P504S and prostate-specific antigen, and normal prostatic gland tissue was positive for prostate-specific antigen and negative for P504S; p63-stained basal cells in normal prostatic gland tissue but did not react with prostatic adenocarcinoma tissue. The CD10 inconsistently stained normal and neoplastic prostatic gland tissue. Epithelial membrane antigen stain was negative in prostatic carcinoma, with rare occasional reactivity in normal prostatic glands. Conclusion.—These findings provide supporting evidence that nephrogenic adenoma is derived from distal renal tubules. Our results also demonstrated that the combination of P504S and prostate-specific antigen with epithelial membrane antigen is a valuable tool in distinguishing prostatic carcinoma from nephrogenic adenoma.


1999 ◽  
Vol 123 (11) ◽  
pp. 1093-1097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod B. Shidham ◽  
Paul F. Lindholm ◽  
André Kajdacsy-Balla ◽  
Zainab Basir ◽  
Varghese George ◽  
...  

Abstract Background.—Lipochrome pigment granules (LPGs) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) localization have been cited as helpful adjuncts in differentiating atypical histologic patterns of seminal vesicle–ejaculatory duct (SVED) from prostatic adenocarcinoma. However, LPGs have been described in both benign and neoplastic prostatic acini, and PSA expression within the intraprostatic SVED has not been fully explored. Design.—Fifty radical prostatectomy specimens were studied for LPGs and 9 cases for PSA expression. Results.—Two morphologic types of LPGs (type 1 and type 2) were observed. The reproducibility in classifying LPGs was evaluated by κ statistics, which demonstrated a strong agreement between 4 observers. Type 1 was restricted to SVED in all 50 specimens. Type 2 was subclassified into 2A and 2B. Type 2 LPGs were observed in prostatic acini of different zones, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, prostatic adenocarcinoma, and occasionally with type 1 LPG in SVED. Focal reactivity for PSA in the distal portion of SVED near urethra was noted in 1 of 9 cases. Conclusion.—Awareness about morphologic differences between the 2 types of LPGs could help to avoid a potential diagnostic pitfall of misinterpreting SVED epithelium for adenocarcinoma. Caution is recommended in interpreting PSA expression, since rare focal PSA reactivity was observed in the distal SVED.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document