scholarly journals A portable and reconfigurable multi-organ platform for drug development with onboard microfluidic flow control

Lab on a Chip ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Coppeta ◽  
M. J. Mescher ◽  
B. C. Isenberg ◽  
A. J. Spencer ◽  
E. S. Kim ◽  
...  

A microphysiological systems platform with high precision onboard flow control supports organ model crosstalk for up to 2 weeks.

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Gaughran ◽  
David Boyle ◽  
James Murphy ◽  
Robert Kelly ◽  
Jens Ducrée

2001 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Y Low ◽  
V Tesar ◽  
J R Tippetts ◽  
M J Pitt ◽  
R W K Allen

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Erbil Abaci ◽  
Michael L. Shuler

Advances in maintaining multiple human tissues on microfluidic platforms has led to a growing interest in the development of microphysiological systems for drug development studies.


Author(s):  
Jens Ducrée

Non-genuine medical products, including diagnostic devices, have become a lucrative business for fraudsters, causing significant damage to revenues and reputation of companies, as well as posing a significant risk to the health of people and societies. Along a “digital twin” representing centrifugal microfluidic flow control on exemplary “Lab-on-a-Disc” (LoaD) systems, a novel, two-pronged strategy to safeguard miniaturized point-of-care devices by means of secret features and manufacturing challenges is outlined; such “hardware encryption” is flexibly programmed for each chip during production, and deciphered from a secure, local or online database at the time of use. This way, unlicensed copying may be efficiently deterred by an unfavourable economy-of-scale, even in absence of legal prosecution.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Passley Hargrove-Grimes ◽  
Lucie A. Low ◽  
Danilo A. Tagle

Microphysiological systems (MPS) or tissue chips/organs-on-chips are novel <i>in vitro</i> models that emulate human physiology at the most basic functional level. In this review, we discuss various hurdles to widespread adoption of MPS technology focusing on issues from multiple stakeholder sectors, e.g., academic MPS developers, commercial suppliers of platforms, the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and regulatory organizations. Broad adoption of MPS technology has thus far been limited by a gap in translation between platform developers, end-users, regulatory agencies, and the pharmaceutical industry. In this brief review, we offer a perspective on the existing barriers and how end-users may help surmount these obstacles to achieve broader adoption of MPS technology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document