scholarly journals Determination of protein–ligand binding modes using fast multi-dimensional NMR with hyperpolarization

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (23) ◽  
pp. 5935-5943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunyi Wang ◽  
Jihyun Kim ◽  
Christian Hilty

The structure of a ligand bound to a protein is determined from fast pseudo-3D NMR spectroscopy with transfer of hyperpolarization.

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (51) ◽  
pp. 11796-11805
Author(s):  
Tasneem M. Vaid ◽  
David K. Chalmers ◽  
Daniel J. Scott ◽  
Paul R. Gooley

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (45) ◽  
pp. 14873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangjin Hou ◽  
Sivakumar Paramasivam ◽  
In-Ja L. Byeon ◽  
Angela M. Gronenborn ◽  
Tatyana Polenova

2016 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biswaranjan Mohanty ◽  
Martin L. Williams ◽  
Bradley C. Doak ◽  
Mansha Vazirani ◽  
Olga Ilyichova ◽  
...  

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 2974
Author(s):  
Qingxin Li ◽  
CongBao Kang

Solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a powerful tool to study structures and dynamics of biomolecules under physiological conditions. As there are numerous NMR-derived methods applicable to probe protein–ligand interactions, NMR has been widely utilized in drug discovery, especially in such steps as hit identification and lead optimization. NMR is frequently used to locate ligand-binding sites on a target protein and to determine ligand binding modes. NMR spectroscopy is also a unique tool in fragment-based drug design (FBDD), as it is able to investigate target-ligand interactions with diverse binding affinities. NMR spectroscopy is able to identify fragments that bind weakly to a target, making it valuable for identifying hits targeting undruggable sites. In this review, we summarize the roles of solution NMR spectroscopy in drug discovery. We describe some methods that are used in identifying fragments, understanding the mechanism of action for a ligand, and monitoring the conformational changes of a target induced by ligand binding. A number of studies have proven that 19F-NMR is very powerful in screening fragments and detecting protein conformational changes. In-cell NMR will also play important roles in drug discovery by elucidating protein-ligand interactions in living cells.


2008 ◽  
Vol 120 (40) ◽  
pp. 7850-7854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Orts ◽  
Jennifer Tuma ◽  
Marcel Reese ◽  
S. Kaspar Grimm ◽  
Peter Monecke ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 2512-2517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Cioffi ◽  
Christopher A. Hunter ◽  
Martin J. Packer ◽  
Andrea Spitaleri

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (40) ◽  
pp. 7736-7740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Orts ◽  
Jennifer Tuma ◽  
Marcel Reese ◽  
S. Kaspar Grimm ◽  
Peter Monecke ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel C. Gill ◽  
David Mobley

<div>Sampling multiple binding modes of a ligand in a single molecular dynamics simulation is difficult. A given ligand may have many internal degrees of freedom, along with many different ways it might orient itself a binding site or across several binding sites, all of which might be separated by large energy barriers. We have developed a novel Monte Carlo move called Molecular Darting (MolDarting) to reversibly sample between predefined binding modes of a ligand. Here, we couple this with nonequilibrium candidate Monte Carlo (NCMC) to improve acceptance of moves.</div><div>We apply this technique to a simple dipeptide system, a ligand binding to T4 Lysozyme L99A, and ligand binding to HIV integrase in order to test this new method. We observe significant increases in acceptance compared to uniformly sampling the internal, and rotational/translational degrees of freedom in these systems.</div>


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Gill ◽  
Nathan M. Lim ◽  
Patrick Grinaway ◽  
Ariën S. Rustenburg ◽  
Josh Fass ◽  
...  

<div>Accurately predicting protein-ligand binding is a major goal in computational chemistry, but even the prediction of ligand binding modes in proteins poses major challenges. Here, we focus on solving the binding mode prediction problem for rigid fragments. That is, we focus on computing the dominant placement, conformation, and orientations of a relatively rigid, fragment-like ligand in a receptor, and the populations of the multiple binding modes which may be relevant. This problem is important in its own right, but is even more timely given the recent success of alchemical free energy calculations. Alchemical calculations are increasingly used to predict binding free energies of ligands to receptors. However, the accuracy of these calculations is dependent on proper sampling of the relevant ligand binding modes. Unfortunately, ligand binding modes may often be uncertain, hard to predict, and/or slow to interconvert on simulation timescales, so proper sampling with current techniques can require prohibitively long simulations. We need new methods which dramatically improve sampling of ligand binding modes. Here, we develop and apply a nonequilibrium candidate Monte Carlo (NCMC) method to improve sampling of ligand binding modes.</div><div><br></div><div>In this technique the ligand is rotated and subsequently allowed to relax in its new position through alchemical perturbation before accepting or rejecting the rotation and relaxation as a nonequilibrium Monte Carlo move. When applied to a T4 lysozyme model binding system, this NCMC method shows over two orders of magnitude improvement in binding mode sampling efficiency compared to a brute force molecular dynamics simulation. This is a first step towards applying this methodology to pharmaceutically relevant binding of fragments and, eventually, drug-like molecules. We are making this approach available via our new Binding Modes of Ligands using Enhanced Sampling (BLUES) package which is freely available on GitHub.</div>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document