Glomerular binding and contractile response to angiotensin II in rats with chronic experimental cirrhosis of the liver

1991 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis M. Villamediana ◽  
Mercedes Velo ◽  
Ana Olivera ◽  
Luis Hernando ◽  
Carlos Caramelo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Plasma Flow ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Contractile Response ◽  
Renal Plasma Flow ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional

1. The effects of angiotensin II on glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow were studied in surgically instrumented conscious control and cirrhotic rats. In addition, angiotensin II binding and the contractile response to angiotensin II were studied in glomeruli isolated from cirrhotic and control rats. 2. Cirrhotic rats had a higher glomerular filtration rate and a higher renal plasma flow than control animals. A non-pressor dose of angiotensin II induced small but significant decreases in glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow in both control and cirrhotic rats, the effect on renal plasma flow being the most pronounced. 3. Plasma renin and aldosterone concentrations were similar in control and cirrhotic rats. 4. The cross-sectional area of glomeruli from cirrhotic rats was 42% greater than that of glomeruli from control animals. Angiotensin II (10−9 mol/l) decreased the cross-sectional area of glomeruli from control animals by 6.4 ± 0.9% and of glomeruli from cirrhotic rats by 6.6 ± 0.8% (P = not significant for comparison between control and cirrhotic animals). 5. There were no differences between control and cirrhotic rats in the affinity of angiotensin II for its glomerular receptors. However, the angiotensin II receptor density was higher in cirrhotic than in control rats, thereby producing an increased total angiotensin II binding in cirrhotic rats. 6. Since no functional differences between control and cirrhotic animals were present in the response to angiotensin II, even though angiotensin II binding was increased, a post-receptor blockade of the angiotensin II signal could be present in cirrhotic rats.

Angiotensin II modulates the intrarenal effects of atrial natriuretic peptide

1988 ◽  
Vol 255 (3) ◽  
pp. F545-F551
Author(s):  
H. M. Siragy ◽  
N. E. Lamb ◽  
C. E. Rose ◽  
M. J. Peach ◽  
R. M. Carey
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Atrial Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Plasma Flow ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Renal Plasma Flow ◽  
Systemic Effects ◽  
Ang Ii ◽  
Renal Effects

The mechanism by which atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) increases renal water and solute excretion is not fully understood. We studied the renal effects of ANP and angiotensin II (ANG II) separately and together in uninephrectomized conscious dogs (n = 7) in sodium metabolic balance (80 meq/day). Exogenous ANG II and ANP were without measurable systemic effects as demonstrated by absence of changes in blood pressure, plasma aldosterone concentration, and plasma renin activity. The quantity of ANG II that had significant renal effects that were without measurable systemic effects was 0.2 pmol.kg-1.min-1. Three infusion rates of ANP had significant renal effects (1, 10, and 20 pmol.kg-1.min-1). These quantities of ANP caused significant diuresis, natriuresis, kaliuresis, and increased glomerular filtration rate without significant changes in renal plasma flow. ANG II alone caused significant antidiuresis, antinatriuresis, and decreased glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow. When ANG II and ANP were given together, no change in urinary flow rate, urinary sodium or potassium excretion, or renal plasma flow was observed, whereas glomerular filtration rate increased. Filtration fraction increased significantly with ANG II and ANP separately and together. Intrarenal ANP prevents the ANG II-induced decrement in urinary sodium excretion and urine flow rate. ANP may play an important role in escape from the sodium-retaining action of intrarenal ANG II.

scholarly journals Individual renal hemodymamic response to chronic angiotensin II receptor bloc­kade and the influence on the renin-angiotensin system gene polymorphisms

2010 ◽  
Vol 63 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 630-637
Author(s):  
Tamara Dragovic ◽  
Boris Ajdinovic ◽  
Vesna Ilic ◽  
Zvonko Magic ◽  
Zoran Andjelkovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Plasma Flow ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Renal Plasma Flow ◽  
Filtration Fraction ◽  
Renal Vascular ◽  
Losartan Treatment

Introduction. Our study was aimed at determining whether the polymorphism of genes for different components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system could influence the renal hemodynamic response to losartan treatment. Material and method. The study included 35 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and persistent albuminuria, genotyped for the 1166 A/C polymorphism gene for the angiotensin II type 1 receptor and I/D polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene. The participants were divided into groups according to the combinations of A or C allele: AA, AC, CC; and according to the combinations of I or D allele: II, ID and DD genotype. The patients received losartan therapy for 12 weeks. The renal hemodynamic measurements were determined at baseline and after the examination period. Results. Losartan therapy significantly reduced the filtration fraction from the baseline by 0.018?0.024 (p=0.012) only in the AC genotype. The glomerular filtration rate remained unchanged in all genotype groups. A significant increase in the effective renal plasma flow was obtained only in AC genotype (544?88 vs 575?90ml/min; p=0.02), while significant reductions in the renal vascular resistance were found in AA group (115?25 vs 95?21 mmHgx1-1xmin-1; p=0.001) and in AC group (118?30 vs 101?28 mmHgx1-1xmin-1; p=0.001). A significant reduction of the glomerular filtration rate by 8?10 ml/min was obtained only in the DD genotype (p=0.016), and only the DD genotype achieved a significant reduction of the filtration fraction by 0.019?0,022 (p=0.008). The most pronounced increase of the effective renal plasma flow was found only in the ID genotype (536 ?75 vs 591?63 ml/min; p=0.01). The reduction of the renal vascular resistance was independent of ACE gene polymorphism. Conclusion. Our study shows that individual renal vascular response to losartan treatment in diabetic patients with persistent albuminuria, could be influenced by genetic polymorphisms.

Interaction between angiotensin II and nitric oxide in control of renal hemodynamics in conscious dogs

1994 ◽  
Vol 267 (6) ◽  
pp. R1472-R1478 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Alberola ◽  
F. J. Salazar ◽  
T. Nakamura ◽  
J. P. Granger
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Plasma Flow ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Renal Plasma Flow ◽  
Nitric Oxide Synthesis ◽  
Afferent Arterioles ◽  
Renal Vascular

Recent in vitro studies have provided evidence that the vasoconstrictor actions of angiotensin II on afferent arterioles are enhanced by nitric oxide synthesis inhibition. Although these studies suggest that nitric oxide may play a role in protecting the afferent arterioles from angiotensin II-induced vasoconstriction, the importance of this interaction in the regulation of glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow in the intact, conscious animal is not known. The objective of the present study was to determine the role of nitric oxide in modulating the renal hemodynamic and excretory effects of angiotensin II. Angiotensin II was infused at rates of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 intrarenally in conscious, chronically instrumented dogs in both the presence and absence of nitric oxide synthesis inhibition by continuous intrarenal infusion of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (3 micrograms.kg-1.min-1). At a dose of 0.5 micrograms.kg-1.min-1, angiotensin II decreased renal plasma flow by 19%, while having no effect on glomerular filtration rate in control dogs. In contrast, angiotensin II decreased renal plasma flow by 54%, glomerular filtration rate by 40%, and increased renal vascular resistance by 125% in the presence of intrarenal nitric oxide synthesis blockade. At doses of 1.0 and 2.0 micrograms.kg-1.min-1, angiotensin II reduced renal plasma flow by 36 and 45%, glomerular filtration rate by 17 and 23%, and increased renal vascular resistance by 80 and 120%, respectively, in control dogs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical Renal Function Testing by External Double Isotope Monitoring Technique

1971 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 16-24
Author(s):  
J. Fog Pedersen ◽  
M. Fog Pedersen ◽  
Paul Madsen
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Plasma Flow ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Renal Plasma Flow ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Feedback System ◽  
Effective Renal Plasma Flow ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages

SummaryAn accurate catheter-free technique for clinical determination simultaneouslyof glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow by means of radioisotopes has been developed. The renal function is estimated by the amount of radioisotopes necessary to maintain a constant concentration in the patient’s blood. The infusion pumps are steered by a feedback system, the pumps being automatically turned on when the radiation measured over the patient’s head falls below a certain preset level and turned off when this level is again readied. 131I-iodopyracet was used for the estimation of effective renal plasma flow and125I-iothalamate estimation of the glomerular filtration rate. These clearances were compared to the conventional bladder clearances and good correlation was found between these two clearance methods (correlation coefficients 0.97 and.90 respectively). The advantages and disadvantages of this new clearance technique are discussed.

Influence of nifedipine on cyclosporin A nephrotoxicity after unilateral nephrectomy in the spontaneously hypertensive rat

1991 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. G. McNally ◽  
F. Baker ◽  
N. Mistry ◽  
J. Walls ◽  
J. Feehally
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Cyclosporin A ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Plasma Flow ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Renal Denervation ◽  
Renal Plasma Flow ◽  
Spontaneously Hypertensive

1. Nifedipine ameliorates cyclosporin A-induced renal impairment in surgically intact (two-kidney) rats. This study investigates the effect of nifedipine on cyclosporin A nephrotoxicity in spontaneously hypertensive rats after either uninephrectomy or uninephrectomy with contralateral renal denervation. 2. Fourteen days after uninephrectomy pair-fed rats were injected for 14 days with cyclosporin A (25 mg/kg body weight) via the subcutaneous route and with nifedipine (0.1 mg/kg body weight) via the intraperitoneal route. Renal and systemic haemodynamics were measured in conscious unrestrained rats. 3. Whole-blood levels of cyclosporin A did not differ between groups (overall 352 ± 22 ng/ml, means ± sem). After uninephrectomy, cyclosporin A decreased the glomerular filtration rate (olive oil versus cyclosporin A: 0.96 ± 0.04 versus 0.70 ± 0.06 ml min−1 100 g body weight, P < 0.02) and effective renal plasma flow (1.94 ± 0.10 versus 1.38 ± 0.13, P < 0.01), and increased renal vascular resistance {(20.2 ± 1.8) × 104 versus (31.6 ± 3.3) × 104 kPa l−1 s [(20.2 ± 1.8) × 103 versus (31.6 ± 3.3) × 103 dyn s cm−5], P < 0.02} and mean arterial pressure (146.7 ± 6.7 versus 167.3 ± 2.9 mmHg, P < 0.05). Neither renal denervation nor nifedipine prevented the reduction in glomerular filtration rate or effective renal plasma flow induced by cyclosporin A. 4. This study infers that the sympathetic nervous system does not play an active role in cyclosporin A nephrotoxicity and demonstrates that the concomitant administration of nifedipine to rats with reduced renal mass does not ameliorate cyclosporin A-induced renal impairment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document