Pragmatic Language Assessment in Williams Syndrome: A Comparison of the Test of Pragmatic Language—2 and the Children's Communication Checklist—2

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Hoffmann ◽  
Marilee A. Martens ◽  
Robert Fox ◽  
Paula Rabidoux ◽  
Rebecca Andridge

Purpose Individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) are recognized as having a strong desire for social relationships, yet many of them have difficulty forming and maintaining peer relationships. One cause may be impairments in pragmatic language. The current study compared the assessment of pragmatic language skills in individuals with WS using the Test of Pragmatic Language—Second Edition (TOPL–2; Phelps-Terasaki & Phelps-Gunn, 2007) and the Children's Communication Checklist—Second Edition (CCC–2; Bishop, 2003). Method Twenty children and adolescents diagnosed with WS were given the TOPL–2, and their parents completed the CCC–2. Results The TOPL–2 identified 8 of the 14 older children (ages 8–16 years) as having pragmatic language impairment and all of the 6 younger children (ages 6–7 years) as having such. In comparison, the CCC–2 identified 6 of the 14 older children and 2 of the 6 younger children as having pragmatic language impairment. The older group also had a higher composite score than the younger group on the CCC–2. Conclusion The TOPL–2 identified significantly more participants as having pragmatic language impairment than did the CCC–2. The TOPL–2 may be more useful in assessing pragmatic language in older children than younger children. The results offer important preliminary clinical implications of language measures that may be beneficial in the assessment of individuals with WS.

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingerith Martin ◽  
Skye McDonald

AbstractRight hemisphere damage (RHD) following unilateral stroke is often associated with impairment of pragmatic language, specifically, the ability to comprehend inferences that arise from language used in context. Three kinds of cognitive deficits have been proposed to explain the pragmatic deficits in RHD individuals, impaired Theory of Mind (TOM), weak central coherence (CC), and impaired executive function (EF). This study aims to evaluate the explanatory ability of these theories in relation to the comprehension of nonliteral (ironic) jokes versus literal lies. Twenty-one RHD patients and 21 age-matched controls were assessed on tasks tapping TOM, CC processing and general inference ability (EF) and the comprehension of irony. Second-order TOM and EF were found to play a significant role. However, neither construct, either in isolation or combined, completely explained the poor performance of RHD patients on this task compared to control participants.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Socher ◽  
Björn Lyxell ◽  
Rachel Ellis ◽  
Malin Gärskog ◽  
Ingrid Hedström ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jariya Chuthapisith ◽  
Pasinee Taycharpipranai ◽  
Rawiwan Roongpraiwan ◽  
Nichara Ruangdaraganon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document