Effects of Stimulus-Onset Asynchrony on the Dichotic Performance of Children with Auditory-Processing Disorders

1979 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily A. Tobey ◽  
John K. Cullen ◽  
Donald L. Rampp ◽  
Ann M. Fleischer-Gallagher

Dichotic stop-consonant-vowel identification was investigated in two experiments using two groups of learning-disabled children demonstrating clinical manifestations of auditory-processing disorders, and two groups of matched, control subjects. Two-item, forced-choice paradigms were used in both experiments. Overall (total) dichotic performance for the two learning-disabled groups was significantly lower than that of the control subjects in all dichotic conditions. This lower performance was attributable to the number of trials in which both stimulus items were correctly identified. Analysis of trials in which only one response was correct showed no differences between the groups in terms of magnitude or direction of ear-advantage (right). In conditions where stimulus onsets were separated by 30, 90, and 150 msec, analysis of one-correct trials demonstrated more accurate identification of the temporally lagging stimulus for all subjects. However, as the onset-time separation increased, the control group’s identification of leading and lagging items approached equality. The learning-disabled group, on the other hand, showed little increase in identification of temporally leading items even when stimuli were separated by 150 msec. These data suggest learning-disabled children with auditory-processing disorders may have a reduced temporal efficiency in processing rapidly varying acoustic patterns associated with stop-consonants that is observable when speech perceptual mechanisms are stressed through dichotic competition.

1975 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 656-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda W. Nober ◽  
E. Harris Nober

This study examined the effects of classroom noise on an auditory processing task of learning disabled children, with distractibility, activity, and cognition controlled. Forty children divided into normal and learning disabled groups were administered both forms of the Wepman Auditory Discrimination Test. Two listening conditions were tested: (1) the relative quiet of small test rooms, and (2) classroom noise (on a tape recorder) in the same test rooms. Results showed that learning disabled children made significantly more auditory discrimination errors than normals in both quiet and noise conditions. Both normal and learning disabled children made significantly more auditory discrimination errors in noise than in quiet. It cannot be said that the noise affected the two groups differentially; the magnitude of the differences was comparable statistically. It was concluded that auditory discrimination scores in quiet do not reflect accurately the expected value for the classroom.


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feeby Mina ◽  
Mohammed El Sayed Darweesh ◽  
Ahmed Nabil Khattab ◽  
Shaimaa Mohammed Serag

Abstract Background Kids with learning disabilities can succeed in school and improve their educational level with the help of a correct rehabilitation program; one of the most effective rehabilitation programs is music therapy. As there was little proof educating us knowledge regarding the function of music treatment in the improvement of learning incapacitated kids in this way, it was imperative to gather these bits of studies in a systematic review study to feature the role of music treatment in the restoration of learning disabilities. The aim of this work is to study the relation between music therapy and learning disabilities, to define the music therapy role and efficacy in the enhancement of learning disabled children to be able to delineate an efficient program therapy later on. This study is a systematic review and was carried out according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Main text The reviewed included studies were intervention studies that used different groups of cases (learning disabled, dyslexic, or with mathematical problems children) which received the music therapy versus different control groups (normal or dyslexic) receiving normal reading program, cognitive or placebo therapy; also they applied different methods and programs of music therapy. Most of the included studies reported that music therapy is a useful aiding factor in rehabilitation therapy of reading and phonological awareness disorders, however little evidence for positive effectiveness regarding spelling, arithmetic, writing, cognitive abilities, working memory, auditory attention, and rapid auditory processing. Conclusion Music therapy (with or without cognitive therapy) has an important and augmenting role in improving reading skills and phonological awareness problems in dyslexic children but does not replace the current methods of rehabilitation. There is little evidence found that music therapy (with or without cognitive therapy) is an effective aiding factor in rehabilitation therapy regarding spelling, arithmetic, writing, cognitive abilities, working memory, auditory attention, and rapid auditory processing in learning disabled children.


2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Tarek Ghannoum ◽  
Amani Ahmed Shalaby ◽  
Abeir Osman Dabbous ◽  
Ehab Ragaa Abd-El-Raouf ◽  
Hebatallah Sherif Abd-El-Hady

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvey Babkoff ◽  
Elisheva Ben-Artzi ◽  
Leah Fostick

1985 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol A. Rashotte ◽  
Joseph K. Torgesen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document