A hierarchical analysis of minisatellite DNA diversity in Gambel oak (Quercus gambeliiNutt.; Fagaceae)

1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 859-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. KUMAR ◽  
S. H. ROGSTAD
Genetics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 164 (4) ◽  
pp. 1511-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Yu ◽  
Michael I Jensen-Seaman ◽  
Leona Chemnick ◽  
Judith R Kidd ◽  
Amos S Deinard ◽  
...  

Abstract Comparison of the levels of nucleotide diversity in humans and apes may provide much insight into the mechanisms of maintenance of DNA polymorphism and the demographic history of these organisms. In the past, abundant mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) polymorphism data indicated that nucleotide diversity (π) is more than threefold higher in chimpanzees than in humans. Furthermore, it has recently been claimed, on the basis of limited data, that this is also true for nuclear DNA. In this study we sequenced 50 noncoding, nonrepetitive DNA segments randomly chosen from the nuclear genome in 9 bonobos and 17 chimpanzees. Surprisingly, the π value for bonobos is only 0.078%, even somewhat lower than that (0.088%) for humans for the same 50 segments. The π values are 0.092, 0.130, and 0.082% for East, Central, and West African chimpanzees, respectively, and 0.132% for all chimpanzees. These values are similar to or at most only 1.5 times higher than that for humans. The much larger difference in mtDNA diversity than in nuclear DNA diversity between humans and chimpanzees is puzzling. We speculate that it is due mainly to a reduction in effective population size (Ne) in the human lineage after the human-chimpanzee divergence, because a reduction in Ne has a stronger effect on mtDNA diversity than on nuclear DNA diversity.


Genetics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 142 (2) ◽  
pp. 629-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kent E Holsinger ◽  
Roberta J Mason-Gamer

Abstract Existing methods for analyzing nucleotide diversity require investigators to identify relevant hierarchical levels before beginning the analysis. We describe a method that partitions diversity into hierarchical components while allowing any structure present in the data to emerge naturally. We present an unbiased version of Nei's nucleotide diversity statistics and show that our modification has the same properties as Wright's  F  ST. We compare its statistical properties with several other F  ST estimators, and we describe how to use these statistics to produce a rooted tree of relationships among the sampled populations in which the mean time to coalescence of haplotypes drawn from populations belonging to the same node is smaller than the mean time to coalescence of haplotypes drawn from populations belonging to different nodes. We illustrate the method by applying it to data from a recent survey of restriction site variation in the chloroplast genome of Coreopsis grandiflora.


2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
MF. Manica-Cattani ◽  
J. Zacaria ◽  
G. Pauletti ◽  
L. Atti-Serafini ◽  
S. Echeverrigaray

Twenty-seven accessions of Lippia alba Mill. collected in Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil, were analysed by ISSR and RAPD markers to evaluate their genetic variability and relationships. Six ISSR primers and four RAPD primers generated 120 amplified fragments, most of which were polymorphics. The overall genetic variability among accessions was very high when compared with other plant species. The hierarchical analysis of molecular data (UPGMA) showed low relationship between accessions, and no grouping between accessions of the same chemotype. Canonical functions allowed identifying some variables related with the chemical characteristics of the essential oils. Both ISSR and RAPD markers were efficient to address the genetic diversity of L. alba, and may contribute to the conservation and breeding of this increasingly important aromatic and medicinal species.


1984 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuo Mikami ◽  
Yuji Kishima ◽  
Masahiro Sugiura ◽  
Toshiro Kinoshita

Author(s):  
Witold A. Pleskacz ◽  
Maksim Jenihhin ◽  
Jaan Raik ◽  
Michal Rakowski ◽  
Raimund Ubar ◽  
...  

Energy Policy ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 991-998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Décio Cicone ◽  
Miguel Edgar Morales Udaeta ◽  
José Aquiles Baesso Grimoni ◽  
Luiz Cláudio Ribeiro Galvão

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document