scholarly journals Range of outward migration and influence of the disc’s mass on the migration of giant planet cores

2011 ◽  
Vol 536 ◽  
pp. A77 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Bitsch ◽  
W. Kley
2021 ◽  
Vol 923 (1) ◽  
pp. L16
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Clement ◽  
Sean N. Raymond ◽  
John E. Chambers

Abstract In spite of substantial advancements in simulating planet formation, the planet Mercury’s diminutive mass and isolated orbit and the absence of planets with shorter orbital periods in the solar system continue to befuddle numerical accretion models. Recent studies have shown that if massive embryos (or even giant planet cores) formed early in the innermost parts of the Sun’s gaseous disk, they would have migrated outward. This migration may have reshaped the surface density profile of terrestrial planet-forming material and generated conditions favorable to the formation of Mercury-like planets. Here we continue to develop this model with an updated suite of numerical simulations. We favor a scenario where Earth’s and Venus’s progenitor nuclei form closer to the Sun and subsequently sculpt the Mercury-forming region by migrating toward their modern orbits. This rapid formation of ∼0.5 M ⊕ cores at ∼0.1–0.5 au is consistent with modern high-resolution simulations of planetesimal accretion. In successful realizations, Earth and Venus accrete mostly dry, enstatite chondrite–like material as they migrate, thus providing a simple explanation for the masses of all four terrestrial planets, the inferred isotopic differences between Earth and Mars, and Mercury’s isolated orbit. Furthermore, our models predict that Venus’s composition should be similar to the Earth’s and possibly derived from a larger fraction of dry material. Conversely, Mercury analogs in our simulations attain a range of final compositions.


2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (S299) ◽  
pp. 218-219
Author(s):  
Min-Kai Lin ◽  
Ryan Cloutier

AbstractGap formation by giant planets in self-gravitating disks may lead to a gravitational edge instability (GEI). We demonstrate this GEI with global 3D and 2D self-gravitating disk-planet simulations using the ZEUS, PLUTO and FARGO hydrodynamic codes. High resolution 2D simulations show that an unstable outer gap edge can lead to outward migration. Our results have important implications for theories of giant planet formation in massive disks.


Icarus ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 233 ◽  
pp. 83-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.E. Chambers

Author(s):  
D. Bockelée-Morvan ◽  
Gianrico Filacchione ◽  
Kathrin Altwegg ◽  
Eleonora Bianchi ◽  
Martin Bizzarro ◽  
...  

AbstractWe describe the AMBITION project, a mission to return the first-ever cryogenically-stored sample of a cometary nucleus, that has been proposed for the ESA Science Programme Voyage 2050. Comets are the leftover building blocks of giant planet cores and other planetary bodies, and fingerprints of Solar System’s formation processes. We summarise some of the most important questions still open in cometary science and Solar System formation after the successful Rosetta mission. We show that many of these scientific questions require sample analysis using techniques that are only possible in laboratories on Earth. We summarize measurements, instrumentation and mission scenarios that can address these questions. We emphasize the need for returning a sample collected at depth or, still more challenging, at cryogenic temperatures while preserving the stratigraphy of the comet nucleus surface layers. We provide requirements for the next generation of landers, for cryogenic sample acquisition and storage during the return to Earth. Rendezvous missions to the main belt comets and Centaurs, expanding our knowledge by exploring new classes of comets, are also discussed. The AMBITION project is discussed in the international context of comet and asteroid space exploration.


2020 ◽  
Vol 501 (1) ◽  
pp. 676-682
Author(s):  
F Lagos ◽  
M R Schreiber ◽  
M Zorotovic ◽  
B T Gänsicke ◽  
M P Ronco ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The discovery of a giant planet candidate orbiting the white dwarf WD 1856+534 with an orbital period of 1.4 d poses the questions of how the planet reached its current position. We here reconstruct the evolutionary history of the system assuming common envelope evolution as the main mechanism that brought the planet to its current position. We find that common envelope evolution can explain the present configuration if it was initiated when the host star was on the asymptotic giant branch, the separation of the planet at the onset of mass transfer was in the range 1.69–2.35 au, and if in addition to the orbital energy of the surviving planet either recombination energy stored in the envelope or another source of additional energy contributed to expelling the envelope. We also discuss the evolution of the planet prior to and following common envelope evolution. Finally, we find that if the system formed through common envelope evolution, its total age is in agreement with its membership to the Galactic thin disc. We therefore conclude that common envelope evolution is at least as likely as alternative formation scenarios previously suggested such as planet–planet scattering or Kozai–Lidov oscillations.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (A29B) ◽  
pp. 427-430
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Walsh

AbstractBuilding models capable of successfully matching the Terrestrial Planet's basic orbital and physical properties has proven difficult. Meanwhile, improved estimates of the nature of water-rich material accreted by the Earth, along with the timing of its delivery, have added even more constraints for models to match. While the outer Asteroid Belt seemingly provides a source for water-rich planetesimals, models that delivered enough of them to the still-forming Terrestrial Planets typically failed on other basic constraints - such as the mass of Mars.Recent models of Terrestrial Planet Formation have explored how the gas-driven migration of the Giant Planets can solve long-standing issues with the Earth/Mars size ratio. This model is forced to reproduce the orbital and taxonomic distribution of bodies in the Asteroid Belt from a much wider range of semimajor axis than previously considered. In doing so, it also provides a mechanism to feed planetesimals from between and beyond the Giant Planet formation region to the still-forming Terrestrial Planets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document