scholarly journals Sensing issues related to the clinical use of implantable loop recorders

EP Europace ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. I. Chrysostomakis ◽  
N. C. Klapsinos ◽  
E. N. Simantirakis ◽  
M. E. Marketou ◽  
D. C. Kambouraki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Position ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Loop Recorder ◽  
New Device ◽  
Device Implantation ◽  
Insertable Loop Recorder ◽  
Qrs Morphology ◽  
Unexplained Syncope

Abstract Aims The newer insertable loop recorder device (Reveal Plus 9526, Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis MN, U.S.A.) is equipped with auto-activation capabilities. In this study we investigated whether the new device encounters sensitivity problems in the form of oversensing or undersensing. We also tested whether body position changes influence the sensed electrogram's amplitude, therefore affecting the device's autosensing ability. Methods and results We enrolled 32 patients aged 58·1±11·7 years with a loop recorder implanted either in the left parasternal or in the heart's apex area, to investigate undiagnosed syncopal episodes after initial assessment. During the follow-up period (5·7±2·7 months), that began 6 months after the device implantation, we analysed 284 auto-recorded episodes (103 undersensed and 181 correctly sensed). No oversensing episodes were recorded. The recorded QRS amplitude in five different body positions: supine, left and right lateral, sitting and standing was measured. No statistically significant changes were observed in the different postures. Even when patients were divided into subgroups according to implant site or the occurrence of undersensing episodes, no significant inter- or intra-group differences of the sensed electrogram were observed. Conclusion Undoubtedly this device is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of unexplained syncope. In the population we studied though, the device faced undersensing problems. Consequently, the device should be equipped with more advanced software for QRS morphology recognition, to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the recorder.

scholarly journals Patients with recurrent syncope and implantable loop recorder exhibit better survival than the control group without implantable loop recorder

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Perings ◽  
C Wolff ◽  
A Wilk ◽  
A Witthohn ◽  
R Voss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Implantable Loop Recorder ◽  
Loop Recorder ◽  
Cardiac Device ◽  
Unexplained Syncope ◽  
Care Costs

Abstract Introduction In 30% of patients with syncope, the underlying cause remains unexplained after clinical investigations. Unexplained syncope tends to recur, significantly impacting patients' quality of life of patients and mortality. Thus, there is a need for timely and more accurate diagnosis to initiate treatment. Dedicated care pathways are recommended by ESC guidelines. Purpose Patients with recurrent syncope were followed over time and patient outcomes with ILR were compared to patients with the same syncope burden, age, gender and mortality risk score who did not receive an ILR. Method A representative database of 4.9 million patients insured by German company statuary health insurances (BKK) was analysed over a time period of 10 years, 2007–17. Patients with recurrent syncope (two times ICD-10 GM diagnosis codes R55), age between 45–84 and no diagnosis code for the syncope were included in the analysis and followed for at least 2 years. Patients with ILR were matched to patients without ILR based on age, gender and Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI) using mahalanobis distances. The index event was the device implant in the ILR group and the second syncope event in the control group. Life expectancy, syncope hospitalisations, fall related injuries, health care costs, diagnoses and treatment rates were compared between the groups. Results A total of 412 patients with ILR for recurrent unexplained syncope were matched to the control group. Overall mean age was 68, mean was CCI 2.7, 42% were females. The risk of death was 2.35 times higher in the control group during follow up as shown in Figure 1 (p-value logrank test <0.0001). Cardiovascular related diagnosis and treatment rates were higher in the ILR group with 69% of patients having a cardiology diagnosis compared to 41% in the control group. Over a quarter (27%) of ILR patients received an implantable cardiac device compared to 5% in the control group. Ablation rates were 7% in the ILR group compared to 0% in the control group. Median health care costs were € 3,847 higher in the ILR group including the costs of the ILR implant, follow up and higher rates of cardiac treatments. These extra costs appear moderate given the substantially higher mortality risk in the control group. Conclusion This study of patients with recurrent unexplained syncope shows a remarkable difference in life expectancy in patients with ILR compared to a matched control group. Two large claim data analysis have recently shown higher rates of cardiovascular death as well as all-cause mortality in patients with unexplained syncope. A more vigilant cardiac workup might be needed to identify a possible underlying cardiac condition. Higher rates of cardiac device therapy in the ILR group were likely to play an important role for their better life expectancy. Cardiac therapies such as pacemakers, defibrillators and ablation have also been shown to significantly improve patients' quality of life. Life Expectancy Comparison Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): The data analysis was funded by Medtronic

scholarly journals Implantable loop recorder follow-up

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Pena Mellado ◽  
R Macias ◽  
L Tercedor ◽  
M Alvarez Lopez
Keyword(s):  
Head Trauma ◽  
Type I ◽  
Av Block ◽  
Implantable Loop Recorder ◽  
Ecg Monitoring ◽  
Loop Recorder ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Unexplained Syncope ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Introduction Long ambulatory ECG monitoring can be a useful component in the evaluation of the patient with unexplained syncope or syncope with suspected arrhythmic origin, as well as a sensitive tool for detecting asymptomatic spontaneous cardiac arrhythmias or conduction abnormalities in predisposed patients. Purpose To determine the diagnostic cost-effectiveness of the implantable loop recorder (ILR) in the origin of unexplained syncope in our center. Methods A retrospective observational study was carried out in a tertiary center, those patients with an ILR between August 2014 and March 2021 were included. Baseline characteristics of the population and their previous ECG, arrythmias detected during follow-up and pacemaker implant rate were evaluated. Results One hundred twenty-seven patients with a ILR were included (age 67 years, 49.6% males). Most often cause of ILR was unexplained syncope (90.6%) followed by monitoring after TAVI implant (3.9%). Normal LVEF (>50%) was present in 85.6%,and 75.6% had NYHA I functional class. 118 patients (92.9%) presented sinus rhythm at implant time, and 8 (6.3%) presented AF. 12.6% presented first degree atrioventricular (AV) block, 2 patients (1.6%) had presented previously Mobitz Type I AV block and one patient 2:1 block. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was present in 13.4%,RBBB in 3.1%,LAFB in 9.4%, RBBB+LAFB in 11% and RBBB+LPFB in 2.4%. Median time of follow-up was 21 months. 3rd degree AV block was the most frequent arrhythmia detected (12.1%), followed by >3s pause (8%) and previously unknown AF (2.4%).The patients with syncope who suffered head trauma (33%) presented a higher rate of pacemaker (PCM) implant compared to those without head trauma: 31.6% vs 14.7%. In total,19.8% PCM rate implant during follow-up. No complications ILR related. Conclusion In conclusion, long home ECG monitoring with ILR is a powerful and helpful tool to find out or rule out potentially dangerous arrhythmias as cause of syncope, with no complications in our experience. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Baseline characteristics Arrhythmias detected during follow-up

scholarly journals Study of diagnosing unexplained syncope with insertable loop recorder system

Heart ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 97 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A174-A174
Author(s):  
L. Zhongmei ◽  
G. Tao ◽  
L. Zhiping
Keyword(s):  
Loop Recorder ◽  
Insertable Loop Recorder ◽  
Unexplained Syncope

scholarly journals Device therapy guided by implantable loop recorders: predictors of bradyarrhythmic events

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Cardoso ◽  
B Faria ◽  
P Von Hafe ◽  
G Dias ◽  
T Pereira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Clinical Predictors ◽  
Device Therapy ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Intraventricular Conduction ◽  
Conduction Disturbances ◽  
Device Implantation ◽  
Unexplained Syncope ◽  
Implantable Loop Recorders

Abstract Background Implantable loop recorders (ILR) improved diagnostic yield in unexplained syncope patients (pts). Data on possible predictive factors for bradycardia requiring device implantation in these pts is limited. We aim to identify clinical predictors for device implantation due to a significant bradyarrhythmia in patients who underwent ILR insertion for the study of syncopal/presyncopal (S/pS) events. Methods Single-center retrospective study of patients who implanted an ILR for the study of unexplained S/pS episodes between 2013 and 2018. The primary endpoint was a documented bradyarrhythmia requiring device implantation during the follow-up. Results A total of 251 pts were included. Mean age was 68±15 years and 53% were female. The majority of pts (220; 88%) had normal ejection fraction. Fifty-two (21%) pts had atrial fibrillation (AF). Regarding basal electrocardiographic characteristics, 34 (14%) pts had 1st degree auriculo-ventricular block (AVB), 31 (12%) pts had left bundle branch block (L-BBB), 22 (9%) pts had R-BBB and 13 (5%) pts had bifascicular block. During a median follow-up of 20 (IQR 9–34) months, 74 (29%) pts required device implantation because of a significant bradyarrhythmia (92% pacemaker, 4% CRT, 4% ICD). Median duration from ILR until device implantation was 5 (IQR 1–10) months. The indications were sick-sinus-syndrome in 47 (64%) pts, advanced AV block in 23 (31%) pts and symptomatic slow AF in 4 (5%) pts. Patients who required device implantation were older (73±12 vs 66±15 years, p <0.001), had more hypertension (73% vs 59% p=0.048), a higher prevalence of AF (34% vs 15% p=0.001) and a lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR<60 ml/min: 32% vs 21%, p=0.047). They also had more 1st AVB (22% vs 11%, p=0.026) and intraventricular conduction disturbances (38% vs 25%, p=0.025). There was a trend for a higher device implantation in pts with concomitant 1st AVB and left anterior fascicular block (7% vs 2%, p=0.063) In a logistic regression model, age >75 years (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1–2.8) and the presence of AF (HR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1–3.0) were independent predictors for device implantation. Conclusion An older age and the presence of AF were independent predictors for device therapy in pts who implanted an ILR for the study of S/pS. These factors may identify a higher risk group and should be considered in the initial workup of these pts. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Permanent pacemaker implantation in unexplained syncope patients with electrophysiology study-proven atrioventricular node disease

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Doundoulakis ◽  
KA Gatzoulis ◽  
P Arsenos ◽  
P Dilaveris ◽  
D Tsiachris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Atrioventricular Node ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
Permanent Pacing ◽  
Electrophysiology Study ◽  
Node Disease ◽  
History Of ◽  
Unexplained Syncope

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background/Introduction: Syncope, whose cause is unknown after an initial assessment, has an uncertain prognosis. It is critical to identify patients at highest risk who may require a pacemaker and to identify the cause of recurrent syncope to prescribe proper therapy Purpose Aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of permanent pacing on the incidence of syncope in patients with unexplained syncope and electrophysiology study-proven atrioventricular node disease. Methods This was an observational study based on a prospective registry of 236 consecutive patients (60.20 ± 18.66 years, 63.1% male, 60.04 ± 9.50 bpm) presenting with recurrent unexplained syncope attacks admitted to our hospital for invasive electrophysiology study (EPS). Τhe implantation of a permanent antibradycardia pacemaker (ABP) was offered to all patients according to the results of the EPS. 135 patients received the ABP, while 101 denied. Results The mean of reported syncope episodes was 1.97 ± 1.10 (or presyncope 2.17 ± 1.50) before they were referred for a combined EP guided diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Over a mean follow-up of approximately 4 years (49.19 ±  29.58 months), the primary outcome event (syncope) occurred in 31 of 236 patients (13.1%), 6 of 135 (4.4%) in the ABP group as compared to 25 of 101 (24.8%) in the no pacemaker group (p < 0.001). Conclusion Among patients with a history of unexplained syncope, a set of positivity criteria for the presence of EPS defined atrioventricular node disease, identifies a subset of patients who will benefit from permanent pacing.

scholarly journals Implantable "loop recorder": A new diagnostic tool for syncope of unknown cause

2005 ◽  
Vol 133 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 338-342
Author(s):  
Goran Milasinovic ◽  
Mirjana Zivkovic ◽  
Velibor Jovanovic ◽  
Vera Jelic ◽  
Dragutin Savic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Tool ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Implantable Loop Recorder ◽  
Loop Recorder ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Maximum Period ◽  
Conventional Tests ◽  
Unexplained Syncope ◽  
Implementation Method

Introduction. The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a new diagnostic tool in cardiology for establishing The causes of unexplained syncope in patients where standard conventional tests, invasive tests included, have failed. The device is a diagnostic "pacemaker," surgically implanted underneath the skin of the chest, with leads attached to the case of the device, not requiring endovenous lead implantation. Heart rhythm is monitored continuously on the basis of an endless loop, up to a maximum period of 14 months. Recording is carried out either by applying an outside activator whenever symptoms occur, or automatically, according to a preset algorithm for bradycardia, tachycardia, and/or asystolic detection. Objective. The aim of this study was to present this new diagnostic method as well as our first experiences with its implementation. METHOD We followed 5 patients (3 male, 2 female, mean age: 46.4?19) who had ILRs ("Reveal Plus," Medtronic Inc., USA) implanted at our centre, over a period of 14 months (7.6 ?5.5], concentrating on their clinical course, symptom occurrence, and electronically monitored heart rhythm at the time of ILR auto activation and/or recordings triggered by outside activation whenever a patient's symptoms were discernible. Results. In three patients, the ILR revealed syncope aetiology by documenting heart rhythm at the time of its occurrence. In one patient, involving a lethal outcome, the ILR was not explanted, so that the rhythm at the time of the fatal syncope, although assumed, remained undocumented, in one, most recently implanted patient, follow-up is still in progress. Conclusion. The implantable loop recorder represents an important innovation and a step forward in establishing the causes of recurrent syncope, which cannot be determined by standard invasive and non-invasive testing.

Profiles of Psychosocial and Clinical Functioning in Adolescence and Risk for Later Depression

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M Olino ◽  
Daniel Klein ◽  
John Seeley
Keyword(s):  
Psychosocial Functioning ◽  
Adolescent Depression ◽  
Depressive Disorders ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Predictive Utility ◽  
Regression Methods ◽  
History Of ◽  
History Of Depression

Background: Most studies examining predictors of onset of depression focus on variable centered regression methods that focus on effects of multiple predictors. In contrast, person-centered approaches develop profiles of factors and these profiles can be examined as predictors of onset. Here, we developed profiles of adolescent psychosocial and clinical functioning among adolescents without a history of major depression. Methods: Data come from a subsample of participants from the Oregon Adolescent Depression Project who completed self-report measures of functioning in adolescence and completed diagnostic and self-report measures at follow-up assessments up to approximately 15 years after baseline. Results: We identified four profiles of psychosocial and clinical functioning: Thriving; Average Functioning; Externalizing Vulnerability and Family Stress; and Internalizing Vulnerability at the baseline assessment of participants without a history of depression at the initial assessment in mid- adolescence. Classes differed in the likelihood of onset and course of depressive disorders, experience of later anxiety and substance use disorders, and psychosocial functioning in adulthood. Moreover, the predictive utility of these classes was maintained when controlling for multiple other established risk factors for depressive disorders. Conclusions: This work highlights the utility of examining multiple factors simultaneously to understand risk for depression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document