292: Paricalcitol Treatment in CKD Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Is Associated With Better Health Outcomes When Compared With No Vitamin D Receptor [VDR] Activator Treatment

2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. B104
Author(s):  
Raimund Sterz ◽  
Carla Frye ◽  
Samina Khan ◽  
Qing Harshaw ◽  
Paul Audhya ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 12-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilit V. Egshatyan ◽  
Natalya G. Mokrisheva

Background: secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is an early complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Maintaining the level of 25(OH)D and parathyroid hormone concentrations in the target range reduce its associated complications (fractures and cardiovascular calcification). Aims: to examine the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation and selective vitamin D receptor agonists treatment on SHPT in CKD. Material and methods: prospective observational study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vitamin D therapy SHPT in 54 in patients with CKD. The first phase (24 weeks) – treatment of suboptimal 25-hydroxycalciferol (25(OH)D) levels. The second (16 weeks) – treatment colecalciferol-resistant SHPT by combination of cholecalciferol with paricalcitol. Blood samples were taken to assess parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25(OH)D, creatinine, calcium, phosphorus levels and calcium excretion. Results: After 8 weeks of cholecalciferol treatment all patients achieved 25(OH)D levels above 20 ng/ml, however 78% of patients still had SHPT. After 16 weeks, the decrease of PTH was achieved in all patients, but significantly only in patients with CKD 2 (19.2%, p< 0.01) and 3 (31%, p <0.05), compared with CKD 4 (17%, p >0.05). After 24 weeks of therapy, PTH normalized in all patients with CKD 2, in 15 (79%) with CKD 3 and in 9 (50%) patients with CKD 4. Cholecalciferol treatment resulted in a substantial increase in 25(OH)D levels with minimal or no impact on calcium, phosphorus levels and kidney function. After 24 weeks we initiated combination therapy (cholecalciferol and paricalcitol) for patients with colecalciferol-resistant SHPT (n=13). PTH levels decreased from 149.1±13.4 to 118.2±14.1 pg/ml at 8 weeks, and to 93.1±9.7 pg/ml (p <0.05) at 16 weeks of treatment. No significant differences in serum calcium, phosphorus or urinary calcium levels. Normalization of PTH was achieved in all patients with CKD 3 and in 8 patients with stage 4. One patient with CKD 4 needed an increase in paricalcitol dose. Conclusion: Cholecalciferol can be used in correcting vitamin D deficiency in patients with all stages of CKD, however, its effectiveness in reducing PTH in stage 4 is limited. Selective analogs, such as paricalcitol, were well-tolerated and effectively decreased PTH levels.


2005 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 402-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Rubello ◽  
Sandro Giannini ◽  
Angela D’Angelo ◽  
Martino Nobile ◽  
Gianni Carraio ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-612
Author(s):  
Tetsuo Shoji ◽  
Shinya Nakatani ◽  
Daijiro Kabata ◽  
Katsuhito Mori ◽  
Ayumi Shintani ◽  
...  

Background and objectivesVitamin D receptor activators and calcimimetics (calcium-sensing receptor agonists) are two major options for medical treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. A higher serum calcification propensity (a shorter T50 value) is a novel surrogate marker of calcification stress and mortality in patients with CKD. We tested a hypothesis that a calcimimetic agent etelcalcetide is more effective in increasing T50 value than a vitamin D receptor activator maxacalcitol.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsA randomized, multicenter, open-label, blinded end point trial with active control was conducted in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing hemodialysis in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous etelcalcetide 5 mg thrice weekly (etelcalcetide group) or intravenous maxacalcitol 5 or 10 µg thrice weekly (maxacalcitol group). The primary, secondary, and tertiary outcomes were changes in T50 value, handgrip strength, and score of the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-Based Integrated Care System from baseline to 12 months, respectively.ResultsIn total, 425 patients from 23 dialysis centers were screened for eligibility, 326 patients were randomized (etelcalcetide, n=167; control, n=159), and 321 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (median age, 66 years; 113 women [35%]). The median (interquartile range) of T50 value was changed from 116 minutes (interquartile range, 90–151) to 131 minutes (interquartile range, 102–176) in the maxacalcitol group, whereas it was changed from 123 minutes (interquartile range, 98–174) to 166 minutes (interquartile range, 127–218) in the etelcalcetide group. The increase in T50 value was significantly greater in the etelcalcetide group (difference in change, 20 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 7 to 34 minutes; P=0.004). No significant between-group difference was found in the change in handgrip strength or in the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-Based Integrated Care System score.ConclusionsEtelcalcetide was more effective in increasing T50 value than maxacalcitol among patients on hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism. There was no difference in handgrip strength or cognition between the two drugs.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:VICTORY; UMIN000030636 and jRCTs051180156


1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 811-812
Author(s):  
D. McCarey ◽  
R. Spooner ◽  
C. Jagger ◽  
A. R. McLellan ◽  
A. G. Jardine

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document