Does Preparation of the Subtalar Joint for Primary Union Affect Clinical Outcome in Patients Undergoing Intramedullary Nail for Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Hindfoot and Ankle?

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 984-987
Author(s):  
Kensei Yoshimoto ◽  
Jun-ichi Fukushi ◽  
Hidetoshi Tsushima ◽  
Satoshi Kamura ◽  
Hisa-aki Miyahara ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 644.1-645
Author(s):  
J. H. Kang ◽  
S. E. Choi ◽  
H. Xu ◽  
D. J. Park ◽  
S. S. Lee

Objectives:Although methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), adherence to MTX in these patients is typically suboptimal. Thus, we investigated the proportion of RA patients who were adherent to MTX and whether non-adherence to MTX affected the clinical outcome in these patients during follow-up.Methods:We enrolled 331 RA patients from a single tertiary center. Data were collected at the time of enrollment and then annually for 4 consecutive years. Adherence was defined by the proportion of days covered at 1 year. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who took more than 80% of MTX and those who did not. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the association between drug compliance and clinical outcome.Results:Of the 331 RA patients, 8.7% had taken less than 80% of MTX during the follow-up period. Non-adherent patients had lower EuroQol-5D scores (P=0.013) and higher RAPID3 scores (P=0.004) at baseline than adherent patients. Leflunomide was more commonly prescribed to adherent patients than non-adherent patients (P=0.012). Non-adherent patients had a higher mean Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate score (P=0.001), higher mean DAS28-C-reactive protein (CRP) score (P=0.001), and higher mean rate of tender and swollen joints (P=0.003 and P=0.002, respectively) than adherent patients. In the multivariate analysis, poor MTX adherence was significantly associated with a higher mean DAS28-CRP score (odds ratio, 0.270; 95% confidence interval, 0.165–0.444; P<0.001).Conclusion:Adherence to MTX can affect disease activity during follow-up in Korean patients with RA. Our results provide a rationale for patient education to maintain good drug adherence in RA patients, to control disease activity.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
George A.W. Bruyn ◽  
Heidi J. Siddle ◽  
Petra Hanova ◽  
Félicie Costantino ◽  
Annamaria Iagnocco ◽  
...  

Objective.To evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the ultrasonographic (US) assessment of subtalar joint (STJ) synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods.Following a Delphi process, 12 sonographers conducted an US reliability exercise on 10 RA patients with hindfoot pain. The anteromedial, posteromedial, and posterolateral STJ was assessed using B-mode and power Doppler (PD) techniques according to an agreed US protocol and using a 4-grade semiquantitative grading score for synovitis [synovial hypertrophy (SH) and signal] and a dichotomous score for the presence of joint effusion (JE). Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were computed by Cohen’s and Light’s κ. Weighted κ coefficients with absolute weighting were computed for B-mode and PD signal.Results.Mean weighted Cohen’s κ for SH, PD, and JE were 0.80 (95% CI 0.62–0.98), 0.61 (95% CI 0.48–0.73), and 0.52 (95% CI 0.36–0.67), respectively. Weighted Cohen’s κ for SH, PD, and JE in the anteromedial, posteromedial, and posterolateral STJ were −0.04 to 0.79, 0.42–0.95, and 0.28–0.77; 0.31–1, −0.05 to 0.65, and −0.2 to 0.69; 0.66–1, 0.52–1, and 0.42–0.88, respectively. Weighted Light’s κ for SH was 0.67 (95% CI 0.58–0.74), 0.46 (95% CI 0.35–0.59) for PD, and 0.16 (95% CI 0.08–0.27) for JE. Weighted Light’s κ for SH, PD, and JE were 0.63 (95% CI 0.45–0.82), 0.33 (95% CI 0.19–0.42), and 0.09 (95% CI −0.01 to 0.19), for the anteromedial; 0.49 (95% CI 0.27–0.64), 0.35 (95% CI 0.27–0.4), and 0.04 (95% CI −0.06 to 0.1) for posteromedial; and 0.82 (95% CI 0.75–0.89), 0.66 (95% CI 0.56–0.8), and 0.18 (95% CI 0.04–0.34) for posterolateral STJ, respectively.Conclusion.Using a multisite assessment, US appears to be a reliable tool for assessing synovitis of STJ in RA.


2009 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 240-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Takenouchi ◽  
Minoru Morishita ◽  
Kimihisa Saitoh ◽  
Kouichi Wauke ◽  
Hiroshi Takahashi ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 269-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masakazu Nagashima ◽  
Akitoshi Tachihara ◽  
Tsuyoshi Matsuzaki ◽  
Kenji Takenouchi ◽  
Juhro Fujimori ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 1165-1175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Leipe ◽  
Markus A. Schramm ◽  
Iryna Prots ◽  
Hendrik Schulze-Koops ◽  
Alla Skapenko

2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 987-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Knevel ◽  
M Schoels ◽  
T W J Huizinga ◽  
D Aletaha ◽  
G R Burmester ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo perform a systematic literature review of effective strategies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsAs part of a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Task Force investigation, a literature search was carried out from January 1962 until February 2009 in PubMed/Ovid Embase/Cochrane and EULAR/American College of Rheumatism (ACR)) abstracts (2007/2008) for studies with a treatment strategy adjusted to target a predefined outcome. Articles were systematically reviewed and clinical outcome, physical function and structural damage were compared between intensive and less intensive strategies. The results were evaluated by an expert panel to consolidate evidence on treatment strategies in RA.ResultsThe search identified two different kinds of treatment strategies: strategies in which the reason for treatment adjustment differed between the study arms (‘steering strategies’, n=13) and strategies in which all trial arms used the same clinical outcome to adjust treatment with different pharmacological treatments (‘medication strategies’, n=7). Both intensive steering strategies and intensive medication strategies resulted in better outcome than less intensive strategies in patients with early active RA.ConclusionIntensive steering strategies and intensive medication strategies produce a better clinical outcome, improved physical function and less structural damage than conventional steering or treatment. Proof in favour of any steering method is lacking and the best medication sequence is still not known.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document