Nicht kleinzelliges Bronchialkarzinom

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 86-86
Author(s):  
Susanne Krome

Patienten mit einem nicht kleinzelligen Bronchialkarzinom (NSCLC) und EGFR-Mutation profitieren von Tyrosinkinaseinhibitoren (TKI), aber nicht alle. Eine aktuelle retrospektive Studie zeigt den Zusammenhang von Behandlungseffektivität und Immunphänotyp: Eine starke PD-L1-Expression war dabei mit einem kürzeren progressionsfreien Überleben und De-novo-Resistenzen assoziiert.

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. vii126
Author(s):  
Simon Y-R. Ang ◽  
Miah-Hiang Tay ◽  
Eunice B-J. Ng ◽  
Peter C-S. Ang ◽  
Benjamin Y-S. Chuah

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20588-e20588
Author(s):  
Linping Gu ◽  
Bei Zhang ◽  
Ding Zhang ◽  
Hong Jian

e20588 Background: Transformation from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the resistance mechanism of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, the clinical course of transformed SCLC and the difference of genomic profiling between de novo SCLC patients and transformed SCLC patients are still poorly characterized. Methods: Patients from our hospital diagnosed with SCLC were enrolled retrospectively in this study, including de novo SCLC patients and SCLC patients transformed from EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas. Genomic profiling was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples by next generation sequencing (NGS). In statistical analysis, fisher ‘exact test was used. All tests were bilateral, with P<0.05 indicating significant statistical difference. Results: In total, 16 patients with SCLC transformed from EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas and 230 de novo SCLC patients were included in our study. Transformed SCLC patients were more in younger (p=0.007), female (p<0.001) and non-smokers (p<0.001) than de novo SCLC patients. In transformed SCLC patients, 12 patients (75%) occurred SCLC transformation within 2 years after the lung adenocarcinomas diagnosis. Median transformation time was 20 months. During the treatment of adenocarcinomas, the overall response rate (ORR) was 75% and the median progression-free survival was 12 months. After the initiation of SCLC therapy, the ORR of 1st line chemotherapy was 40%. For the genomic profiling, EGFR mutations, including exon 19 deletion (56%), L858R (38%), and others (6%), were detected. 11 patients with acquired resistance were received EGFR T790M test, 82% of patients had acquired EGFR T790M mutation. 11 patients after transformation to SCLC had NGS test, 100% maintained their founder EGFR mutation, and other recurrent mutations included TP53, RB1 and EGFR amplification. Compared with the genetic alterations in de novo SCLC patients, TP53 mutations were significantly decreased (p=0.006) while EGFR mutations were significantly elevated (p<0.001) in transformed SCLC patients. However, no significant difference on RB1, ALK and ROS1 mutations were observed. Interestingly, a 60-year-old woman in our transformed SCLC cohort harbored EGFR 19 del mutant at allele frequency of 50.39%,she received osimertinib plus epirubicin/cyclophosphamide as 1st line treatment and reached partial response, with survival of 4 years to date. Conclusions: We demonstrated the clinical and genetic characteristics of EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma transformed SCLC and found one patient still benefited from EGFR-TKI. Our study suggested that SCLC patients with EGFR mutation who transformed from lung adenocarcinoma may be potential benefit population using EGFR inhibitors.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Feinberg ◽  
Balazs Halmos ◽  
Rasim Gucalp ◽  
Wenbo Tang ◽  
Barbara Moehring ◽  
...  

Aim: To assess time-to-treatment failure (TTF) in US patients with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received sequential afatinib–osimertinib treatment in the global, observational GioTag study. Patients & methods: Patients had EGFR T790M mutation-positive disease after first-line afatinib and subsequently received osimertinib. The primary outcome was TTF. Results: In 129 patients at US centers, median TTF was 28.4 months (90% CI: 27.0–34.1). Median overall survival was 47.6 months (90% CI: 35.5–51.5). Conclusion: Sequential afatinib–osimertinib in this US-treated population was associated with long median TTF and represents an effective, evidence-based treatment option for US patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC not presenting with active brain metastases or de novo T790M. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03370770 (ClinicalTrials.gov)


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23101-e23101
Author(s):  
Natsuki Takano ◽  
Satoru Kitazono ◽  
Ryo Ariyasu ◽  
Junji Koyama ◽  
Masafumi Saiki ◽  
...  

e23101 Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is the most important factor for determining the treatment strategy for non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Currently, two methods (cobas and Scorpion ARMS) have been approved as companion diagnostics for using EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Although there are some differences in the spectrums and sensitivities for detecting EGFRmutations such as exon 19 deletions (ex19del), L858R and T790M mutations, the extent of the differences affecting clinical practice is unclear. Methods: All patients with NSCLC who underwent EGFR mutation tests and treated at our hospital from February 2014 to February 2016 were enrolled. To detect EGFR mutations, the Scorpion ARMS (S) method was used from 2014 to 2015 and thecobasEGFR Mutation Test (C) from 2015 to 2016. We retrospectively investigated the detection rate of each EGFRmutation type and compared the rates between the two methods. Results: A total of 1,287 patients were enrolled. To detect EGFR mutations, 627 patients were tested by the S method and 660 by the C method, respectively. Of 1287 patients, 910 patients underwent initial biopsy, whereas 121 patients underwent re-biopsy after EGFR-TKI failure. EGFRmutations were detected in 130 of 418 (31.1%) patients and 153 of 492 (31.1%) patients by the S and C methods, respectively in the initial biopsy (P = 0.982). However, the detection rate of ex19del was slightly lower in the S method (12.6%) than in the C method (16.3%) (P = 0.105). Conversely, the detection rate of L858R was lower in the C method (13.8%) than in the S method (16.7%), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.252). De novo T790M was detected in one (0.2%) patient by the S method and in none by the C method. In re-biopsy after EGFR-TKI failure, the detection rates of T790M were as follows: 19 of 55 patients (34.5%) by the S method and 20 of 66 (30.3%) by the C method (P = 0.619). Conclusions: The different spectrums and sensitivities of EGFR mutations between the S and C methods were observed; however, they did not significantly affect clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document