Grayscale Ultrasound Radiomic Features and Shear-Wave Elastography Radiomic Features in Benign and Malignant Breast Masses

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (04) ◽  
pp. 390-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Hyun Youk ◽  
Jin Young Kwak ◽  
Eunjung Lee ◽  
Eun Ju Son ◽  
Jeong-Ah Kim
Keyword(s):  
Feature Selection ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Grayscale Image ◽  
Lasso Regression ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Breast Radiologist

Abstract Purpose To identify and compare diagnostic performance of radiomic features between grayscale ultrasound (US) and shear-wave elastography (SWE) in breast masses. Materials and Methods We retrospectively collected 328 pathologically confirmed breast masses in 296 women who underwent grayscale US and SWE before biopsy or surgery. A representative SWE image of the mass displayed with a grayscale image in split-screen mode was selected. An ROI was delineated around the mass boundary on the grayscale image and copied and pasted to the SWE image by a dedicated breast radiologist for lesion segmentation. A total of 730 candidate radiomic features including first-order statistics and textural and wavelet features were extracted from each image. LASSO regression was used for data dimension reduction and feature selection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent radiomic features, differentiating between benign and malignant masses with calculation of the AUC. Results Of 328 breast masses, 205 (62.5 %) were benign and 123 (37.5 %) were malignant. Following radiomic feature selection, 22 features from grayscale and 6 features from SWE remained. On univariate analysis, all 6 SWE radiomic features (P < 0.0001) and 21 of 22 grayscale radiomic features (P < 0.03) were significantly different between benign and malignant masses. After multivariate analysis, three grayscale radiomic features and two SWE radiomic features were independently associated with malignant breast masses. The AUC was 0.929 for grayscale US and 0.992 for SWE (P < 0.001). Conclusion US radiomic features may have the potential to improve diagnostic performance for breast masses, but further investigation of independent and larger datasets is needed.

A qualitative and quantitative assessment of simultaneous strain, shear wave, and point shear wave elastography to distinguish malignant and benign breast lesions

2020 ◽  
pp. 028418512096142
Author(s):  
Yasemin Altıntas ◽  
Mehmet Bayrak ◽  
Ömer Alabaz ◽  
Medih Celiktas
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Strain Ratio ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Us Elastography

Background Ultrasound (US) elastography has become a routine instrument in ultrasonographic diagnosis that measures the consistency and stiffness of tissues. Purpose To distinguish benign and malignant breast masses using a single US system by comparing the diagnostic parameters of three kinds of breast elastography simultaneously added to B-mode ultrasonography. Material and Methods A total of 163 breast lesions in 159 consecutive women who underwent US-guided core needle biopsy were included in this prospective study. Before the biopsy, the lesions were examined with B-mode ultrasonography and strain (SE), shear wave (SWE), and point shear wave (STQ) elastography. The strain ratio was computed and the Tsukuba score determined. The mean elasticity values using SWE and STQ were computed and converted to Young’s modulus E (kPa). Results All SE, SWE, and STQ parameters showed similar diagnostic performance. The SE score, SE ratio, SWEmean, SWEmax, STQmean, and STQmax yielded higher specificity than B-mode US alone to differentiate benign and malignant masses. The sensitivity of B-mode US, SWE, and STQ was slightly higher than that of the SE score and SE ratio. The SE score, SE ratio, SWEmean, SWEmax, STQmean, and STQmax had significantly higher positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy than B-mode US alone. The area under the curve for each of these elastography methods in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions was 0.93, 0.93, 0.98, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.96, respectively; P<0.001 for all measurements. Conclusion SE (ratio and score), SWE, and STQ had higher diagnostic performance individually than B-mode US alone in distinguishing between malignant and benign breast masses.

Classification of Breast Masses on Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography using Convolutional Neural Networks

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 213-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Fujioka ◽  
Leona Katsuta ◽  
Kazunori Kubota ◽  
Mio Mori ◽  
Yuka Kikuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Networks ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Convolutional Neural Networks ◽  
Test Data ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Malignant Breast

We aimed to use deep learning with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to discriminate images of benign and malignant breast masses on ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE). We retrospectively gathered 158 images of benign masses and 146 images of malignant masses as training data for SWE. A deep learning model was constructed using several CNN architectures (Xception, InceptionV3, InceptionResNetV2, DenseNet121, DenseNet169, and NASNetMobile) with 50, 100, and 200 epochs. We analyzed SWE images of 38 benign masses and 35 malignant masses as test data. Two radiologists interpreted these test data through a consensus reading using a 5-point visual color assessment (SWEc) and the mean elasticity value (in kPa) (SWEe). Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. The best CNN model (which was DenseNet169 with 100 epochs), SWEc, and SWEe had a sensitivity of 0.857, 0.829, and 0.914 and a specificity of 0.789, 0.737, and 0.763 respectively. The CNNs exhibited a mean AUC of 0.870 (range, 0.844–0.898), and SWEc and SWEe had an AUC of 0.821 and 0.855. The CNNs had an equal or better diagnostic performance compared with radiologist readings. DenseNet169 with 100 epochs, Xception with 50 epochs, and Xception with 100 epochs had a better diagnostic performance compared with SWEc ( P = 0.018–0.037). Deep learning with CNNs exhibited equal or higher AUC compared with radiologists when discriminating benign from malignant breast masses on ultrasound SWE.

scholarly journals Application of 3D and 2D quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Tian ◽  
Qianqi Liu ◽  
Xi Wang ◽  
Ping Xing ◽  
Zhuowen Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Malignant Breast

scholarly journals Combination of shear wave elastography and BI-RADS in identification of solid breast masses

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Zheng ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
Zhi-Dong Xuan ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
Lei Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Definitive Diagnosis ◽  
Pathological Examination ◽  
Diagnostic Specificity ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
Grade Ii

Abstract Background To explore the value of quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) plus the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) in the identification of solid breast masses. Methods A total of 108 patients with 120 solid breast masses admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were enrolled in this study. The pathological examination served as the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. Both SWE and BI-RADS grading were performed. Results Out of the 120 solid breast masses in 108 patients, 75 benign and 45 malignant masses were pathologically confirmed. The size, shape, margin, internal echo, microcalcification, lateral acoustic shadow, and posterior acoustic enhancement of benign and malignant masses were significantly different (all P < 0.05). The E mean, E max, SD, and E ratio of benign and malignant masses were significantly different (all P < 0.05). The E min was similar between benign and malignant masses (P > 0.05). The percentage of Adler grade II-III of the benign masses was lower than that of the malignant masses (P < 0.05). BI-RADS plus SWE yielded higher diagnostic specificity and positive predictive value than either BI-RADS or SWE; BI-RADS plus SWE yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy among the three methods (all P < 0.05). Conclusion SWE plus routine ultrasonography BI-RADS has a higher value in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses than color doppler or SWE alone, which should be further promoted in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Diagnostic role of shear wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nichanametla Sravani ◽  
Ananthakrishnan Ramesh ◽  
Sathasivam Sureshkumar ◽  
Chellappa Vijayakumar ◽  
K.M. Abdulbasith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
Diagnostic Role ◽  
Malignant Breast

scholarly journals The role of tissue elasticity in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using shear wave elastography

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Yang ◽  
Yongyuan Xu ◽  
Yanan Zhao ◽  
Jing Yin ◽  
Zhiyi Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Surrounding Tissue ◽  
Breast Lesions ◽  
Tissue Elasticity ◽  
Malignant Breast

Abstract Background Elastography is a promising way to evaluate tissue differences regarding stiffness, and the stiffness of the malignant breast lesions increased at the lesion margin. However, there is a lack of data on the value of the shear wave elastography (SWE) parameters of the surrounding tissue (shell) of different diameter on the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of shell elasticity in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using SWE. Methods Between September 2016 and June 2017, women with breast lesions underwent both conventional ultrasound (US) and SWE. Elastic values of the lesions peripheral tissue were determined according to the shell size, which was automatically drawn along the edge of the lesion using the following software guidelines: (1): 1 mm; (2): 2 mm; and (3): 3 mm. Quantitative elastographic features of the inner lesions and shell, including the elasticity mean (Emean), elasticity maximum (Emax), and elasticity minimum (Emin), were calculated using an online-available software. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) of the elastographic features was analyzed to assess the diagnostic performance, and the area under curve (AUC) of each elastographic feature was obtained. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict significant factors of malignancy, permitting the design of predictive models. Results This prospective study included 63 breast lesions of 63 women. Of the 63 lesions, 33 were malignant and 30 were benign. The diagnostic performance of Emax-3shell was the highest (AUC = 0.76) with a sensitivity of 60.6% and a specificity of 83.3%. According to stepwise logistic regression analysis, the Emax-3shell and the Emin-3shell were significant predictors of malignancy (p < 0.05). The AUC of the predictive equation was 0.86. Conclusions SWE features, particularly the combination of Emax-3shell and Emin-3shell can improve the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Performance of shear-wave elastography for breast masses using different region-of-interest (ROI) settings

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 789-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Hyun Youk ◽  
Eun Ju Son ◽  
Kyunghwa Han ◽  
Hye Mi Gweon ◽  
Jeong-Ah Kim
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Region Of Interest ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Breast Masses ◽  
The Mean

Background Various size and shape of region of interest (ROI) can be applied for shear-wave elastography (SWE). Purpose To investigate the diagnostic performance of SWE according to ROI settings for breast masses. Material and Methods To measure elasticity for 142 lesions, ROIs were set as follows: circular ROIs 1 mm (ROI-1), 2 mm (ROI-2), and 3 mm (ROI-3) in diameter placed over the stiffest part of the mass; freehand ROIs drawn by tracing the border of mass (ROI-M) and the area of peritumoral increased stiffness (ROI-MR); and circular ROIs placed within the mass (ROI-C) and to encompass the area of peritumoral increased stiffness (ROI-CR). Mean (Emean), maximum (Emax), and standard deviation (ESD) of elasticity values and their areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUCs) for diagnostic performance were compared. Results Means of Emean and ESD significantly differed between ROI-1, ROI-2, and ROI-3 ( P < 0.0001), whereas means of Emax did not ( P = 0.50). For ESD, ROI-1 (0.874) showed a lower AUC than ROI-2 (0.964) and ROI-3 (0.975) ( P < 0.002). The mean ESD was significantly different between ROI-M and ROI-MR and between ROI-C and ROI-CR ( P < 0.0001). The AUCs of ESD in ROI-M and ROI-C were significantly lower than in ROI-MR ( P = 0.041 and 0.015) and ROI-CR ( P = 0.007 and 0.004). Conclusion Shear-wave elasticity values and their diagnostic performance vary based on ROI settings and elasticity indices. Emax is recommended for the ROIs over the stiffest part of mass and an ROI encompassing the peritumoral area of increased stiffness is recommended for elastic heterogeneity of mass.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document