The pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasms involving the pyloric ring

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of superficial gastric lesions involving the pyloric ring is difficult. The pocket-creation method (PCM) with a small-caliber-tip transparent hood can overcome this difficulty by compressing the pyloric sphincter applying both traction and counter-traction. The aim of this study is to clarify the usefulness of the PCM for ESD of superficial gastric neoplasms involving the pyloric ring compared to the conventional method (CM). Patients and methods From October 2006 to August 2019, 66 gastric lesions requiring duodenal submucosal dissection beyond the pyloric ring in 66 patients were resected. The CM was mainly performed in the first period (CM group, n = 46) and the PCM in the second period (PCM group, n = 20). We retrospectively reviewed their medical records. Results Although no significant differences were observed in en bloc resection rates between the two groups, the PCM group had a significantly higher R0 resection rate than the CM group (P = 0.047). There were no holes in resected specimens in the PCM group while three specimens in the CM group had a hole. The dissection speed in the PCM group tended to be higher than in the CM group, although it did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.148). No significant differences were observed for the incidence of adverse events. Conclusions This is the first study reporting the advantages of the PCM over the CM for ESD of gastric lesions involving the pyloric ring. We believe that the PCM is an effective strategy to compress the pyloric sphincter and facilitates R0 resection.

Download Full-text

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Neoplastic Lesions: An Italian, Multicenter Study

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm9030737 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (3) ◽

pp. 737

Author(s):

Raffaele Manta ◽

Giuseppe Galloro ◽

Francesco Pugliese ◽

Stefano Angeletti ◽

Angelo Caruso ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽

En Bloc Resection ◽

Bloc Resection ◽

R0 Resection ◽

Gastric Lesions ◽

En Bloc ◽

Submucosal Dissection ◽

Neoplastic Lesions ◽

One Year

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows removing neoplastic lesions on gastric mucosa, including early gastric cancer (EGC) and dysplasia. Data on ESD from Western countries are still scanty. We report results of ESD procedures performed in Italy. Data of consecutive patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplastic removal were analyzed. The en bloc resection rate and the R0 resection rates for all neoplastic lesions were calculated, as well as the curative rate (i.e., no need for surgical treatment) for EGC. The incidence of complications, the one-month mortality, and the recurrence rate at one-year follow-up were computed. A total of 296 patients with 299 gastric lesions (80 EGC) were treated. The en bloc resection was successful for 292 (97.6%) and the R0 was achieved in 266 (89%) out of all lesions. In the EGC group, the ESD was eventually curative in 72.5% (58/80) following procedure. A complication occurred in 30 (10.1%) patients. Endoscopic treatment was successful in all 3 perforations, whereas it failed in 2 out of 27 bleeding patients who were treated with radiological embolization (1 case) or surgery (1 case). No procedure-related deaths at one-month follow-up were observed. Lesion recurrence occurred in 16 (6.2%) patients (6 EGC and 10 dysplasia). In conclusion, the rate of both en bloc and R0 gastric lesions removal was very high in Italy. However, the curative rate for EGC needs to be improved. Complications were acceptably low and amenable at endoscopy.

Download Full-text

Acceptability of endoscopic submucosal dissection for sessile serrated lesions: comparison with non-sessile serrated lesions

Endoscopy International Open ◽

10.1055/a-1268-7353 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 08 (12) ◽

pp. E1832-E1839

Author(s):

Yuichiro Kuroki ◽

Toshiyuki Endo ◽

Kenta Iwahashi ◽

Naoki Miyao ◽

Reika Suzuki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽

Postoperative Bleeding ◽

En Bloc Resection ◽

Tumor Location ◽

Proximal Colon ◽

R0 Resection ◽

Resection Rate ◽

En Bloc ◽

Submucosal Dissection ◽

Serrated Lesions

Abstract Background and study aims Sessile serrated lesions (SSL) are major precursor lesions of serrated pathway cancers, and appropriate treatment may prevent interval colorectal cancer. Studies have reported the outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for SSL; however, there are insufficient reports on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We examined the characteristics and outcomes of SSL and compared them to those of non-SSL in ESD. Patients and methods We reviewed 370 consecutive cases in 322 patients who underwent colorectal ESD between January 2016 and March 2020 at our hospital. There were 267 0-IIa lesions that were stratified into 41 SSL and 226 non-SSL (intramucosal cancer, adenoma) cases. We used propensity matching to adjust for the variances in the factors affecting treatment between the SSL and non-SSL groups. Results In the baseline cases, young women and proximal colon tumor location were significantly more common in the SSL group. There were no statistically significant differences between the SSL and non-SSL groups in terms of en bloc resection rate (97.6 % vs. 99.6 %; P = 0.28), R0 resection rate (92.7 % vs. 93.4 %; P = 0.74), perforation (0 % vs. 0.9 %; P > 0.99), and postoperative bleeding (2.4 % vs. 1.8 %; P = 0.56). Thirty-eight pairs were matched using propensity score, and the median dissection speed (12 vs. 7.7 cm2/h; P = 0.0095) was significantly faster in the SSL than in the non-SSL group. Conclusions ESD for SSL was safely performed, and SSL was smoother to remove than non-SSL. ESD might be an acceptable endoscopic treatment option for SSL.

Download Full-text

Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in a Western Center: Analysis of Outcomes and Safety Profile

GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology ◽

10.1159/000514797 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

João Santos-Antunes ◽

Margarida Marques ◽

Rui Morais ◽

Fátima Carneiro ◽

Guilherme Macedo

Keyword(s):

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽

Safety Profile ◽

En Bloc Resection ◽

R0 Resection ◽

Hybrid Technique ◽

Resection Rate ◽

En Bloc ◽

Delayed Bleeding ◽

Submucosal Dissection ◽

Gastrointestinal Lesions

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established endoscopic technique for the treatment of gastrointestinal lesions. Colorectal ESD outcomes are less reported in the Western literature, and Portuguese data are still very scarce. Our aim was to describe our experience on colorectal ESD regarding its outcomes and safety profile. Methods: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of recorded data on ESDs performed between 2015 and 2020. Only ESDs performed on epithelial neoplastic lesions were selected for further analysis. Results: Of a total of 167 colorectal ESDs, 153 were included. Technical success was achieved in 147 procedures (96%). The lesions were located in the colon (n = 24) and rectum (n = 123). The en bloc resection rate was 92% and 97%, the R0 resection rate was 83% and 82%, and the curative resection rate was 79% and 78% for the colon and the rectum, respectively. The need for a hybrid technique was the only risk factor for piecemeal or R1 resection. We report a perforation rate of 3.4% and a 4.1% rate of delayed bleeding; all the adverse events were manageable endoscopically, without the need of blood transfusions or surgery. Most of the lesions were laterally spreading tumours of the granular mixed type (70%), and 20% of the lesions were malignant (12% submucosal and 8% intramucosal cancer). Conclusion: Our series on colorectal ESD reports a very good efficacy and safety profile. This technique can be applied by endoscopists experienced in ESD.

Download Full-text

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of 301 large colorectal neoplasias: outcome and learning curve from a specialized center in Europe

Endoscopy International Open ◽

10.1055/a-0733-3668 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 06 (11) ◽

pp. E1340-E1348 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Carl-Fredrik Rönnow ◽

Noriya Uedo ◽

Ervin Toth ◽

Henrik Thorlacius

Keyword(s):

Learning Curve ◽

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽

Colorectal Neoplasia ◽

En Bloc Resection ◽

Bloc Resection ◽

High Rate ◽

R0 Resection ◽

En Bloc ◽

Submucosal Dissection ◽

Immediate Bleeding

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows en bloc resection of large colorectal lesions but ESD experience is limited outside Asia. This study evaluated implementation of ESD in the treatment of colorectal neoplasia in a Western center. Patients and methods Three hundred and one cases of colorectal ESD (173 rectal and 128 colonic lesions) were retrospectively evaluated in terms of outcome, learning curve and complications. Results Median size was 4 cm (range 1 – 12.5). En bloc resection was achieved in 241 cases amounting to an en bloc resection rate of 80 %. R0 resection was accomplished in 207 cases (69 %), RX and R1 were attained in 83 (27 %) and 11 (4 %) cases, respectively. Median time was 98 min (range 10 – 588) and median proficiency was 7.2 cm2/h. Complications occurred in 24 patients (8 %) divided into 12 immediate perforations, five delayed perforations, one immediate bleeding and six delayed bleedings. Six patients (2 %), all with proximal lesions, had emergency surgery. Two hundred and four patients were followed up endoscopically and median follow-up time was 13 months (range 3 – 53) revealing seven recurrences (3 %). En bloc rate improved gradually from 60 % during the first period to 98 % during the last period. ESD proficiency significantly improved between the first study period (3.6 cm2/h) and the last study period (10.8 cm2/h). Conclusions This study represents the largest material on colorectal ESD in the west and shows that colorectal ESD can be implemented in clinical routine in western countries after appropriate training and achieve a high rate of en bloc and R0 resection with a concomitant low incidence of complications. ESD of proximal colonic lesions should be attempted with caution during the learning curve because of higher risk of complications.

Download Full-text

Multi-loop traction device facilitates gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: ex vivo pilot study and an inaugural clinical experience

BMC Gastroenterology ◽

10.1186/s12876-021-02085-w ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Hiroaki Matsui ◽

Naoto Tamai ◽

Toshiki Futakuchi ◽

Shunsuke Kamba ◽

Akira Dobashi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pilot Study ◽

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Ex Vivo ◽

En Bloc Resection ◽

Bloc Resection ◽

R0 Resection ◽

En Bloc ◽

Submucosal Dissection ◽

Traction Device

Abstract Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically difficult and requires considerable training. The authors have developed a multi-loop traction device (MLTD), a new traction device that offers easy attachment and detachment. We aimed to evaluate the utility of MLTD in ESD. Methods This ex vivo pilot study was a prospective, block-randomized, comparative study of a porcine stomach model. Twenty-four lesions were assigned to a group that undertook ESD using the MLTD (M-ESD group) and a group that undertook conventional ESD (C-ESD group) to compare the speed of submucosal dissection. In addition, the data of consecutive 10 patients with eleven gastric lesions was collected using electronic medical records to clarify the inaugural clinical outcomes of gastric ESD using MLTD. Results The median (interquartile range) speed of submucosal dissection in the M-ESD and C-ESD groups were 141.5 (60.9–177.6) mm2/min and 35.5 (20.8–52.3) mm2/min, respectively; submucosal dissection was significantly faster in the M-ESD group (p < 0.05). The rate of en bloc resection and R0 resection was 100% in both groups, and there were no perforation in either group. The MLTD attachment time was 2.5 ± 0.9 min and the MLTD extraction time was 1.0 ± 1.1 min. Clinical outcomes of MLTD in gastric ESD were almost the same as those of ex vivo pilot study. Conclusions MLTD increased the speed of submucosal dissection in ESD and was similarly effective when used by expert and trainee endoscopists without perforation. MLTD can potentially ensure a safer and faster ESD.

Download Full-text

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neoplasia: a multicenter North American experience

Endoscopy International Open ◽

10.1055/a-1010-5663 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 07 (12) ◽

pp. E1714-E1722

Author(s):

Dennis Yang ◽

Hiroyuki Aihara ◽

Yaseen B. Perbtani ◽

Andrew Y. Wang ◽

Abdul Aziz Aadam ◽

...

Keyword(s):

North America ◽

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽

En Bloc Resection ◽

Bloc Resection ◽

R0 Resection ◽

En Bloc ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

American Experience ◽

Submucosal Dissection ◽

Submucosal Fibrosis

Abstract Background and aims Rectal lesions traditionally represent the first lesions approached during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training in the West. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of rectal ESD in North America. Methods This is a multicenter retrospective analysis of rectal ESD between January 2010 and September 2018 in 15 centers. End points included: rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, adverse events, comparison of pre- and post-ESD histology, and factors associated with failed resection. Results In total, 171 patients (median age 63 years; 56 % men) underwent rectal ESD (median size 43 mm). En bloc resection was achieved in 141 cases (82.5 %; 95 %CI 76.8–88.2), including 24 of 27 (88.9 %) with prior failed endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). R0 resection rate was 74.9 % (95 %CI 68.4–81.4). Post-ESD bleeding and perforation occurred in 4 (2.3 %) and 7 (4.1 %), respectively. Covert submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC) was identified in 8.6 % of post-ESD specimens. There was one case (1/120; 0.8 %) of recurrence at a median follow-up of 31 weeks; IQR: 19–76 weeks). Older age and higher body mass index (BMI) were predictors of failed R0 resection, whereas submucosal fibrosis was associated with a higher likelihood of both failed en bloc and R0 resection. Conclusion Rectal ESD in North America is safe and is associated with high en bloc and R0 resection rates. The presence of submucosal fibrosis was the main predictor of failed en bloc and R0 resection. ESD can be considered for select rectal lesions, and serves not only to establish a definitive tissue diagnosis but also to provide curative resection for lesions with covert advanced disease.

Download Full-text

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of malignant non-pedunculated colorectal lesions

Endoscopy International Open ◽

10.1055/a-0602-4065 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 06 (08) ◽

pp. E961-E968 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Carl-Fredrik Rönnow ◽

Jacob Elebro ◽

Ervin Toth ◽

Henrik Thorlacius

Keyword(s):

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽

Curative Resection ◽

Residual Tumor ◽

En Bloc Resection ◽

Bloc Resection ◽

R0 Resection ◽

En Bloc ◽

Submucosal Dissection ◽

Additional Surgery ◽

Procedural Time

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an established method for en bloc resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions in Asia but dissemination of ESD in Western countries is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of ESD in the management of malignant non-pedunculated colorectal lesions in a European center. Patients and methods Among 255 patients undergoing colorectal ESD between 2014 and 2016, 29 cases were identified as submucosal invasive cancers and included in this study. The main outcomes were en bloc, R0 and curative resection as well as procedural time, complications and recurrence. Results Median tumor size was 40 mm (range 20 – 70 mm). Thirteen cancers were located in the colon and 16 were located in the rectum. Procedural time was 89 minutes (range 18 – 594 minutes). Complete resection was achieved in 28 cases, en bloc and R0 resection rates were 83 % and 69 %, respectively. Curative resection rate was 38 %. One case had a perforation in the sigmoid colon requiring emergency surgery. No significant bleeding occurred. Six patients underwent additional surgery after ESD, one of whom had residual tumor. One recurrence was detected in 20 patients that were followed-up endoscopically, median follow-up time was 13 months (range 2 – 30 months). Conclusion ESD seems to be a safe and effective method for treating non-pedunculated malignant colorectal lesions after careful patient selection and proper endoscopic training.

Download Full-text

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neoplastic lesions: experience from a European center.

Archives of Medical Science ◽

10.5114/aoms/144292 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Michał Spychalski ◽

Marcin Włodarczyk ◽

Jakub Włodarczyk ◽

Igor Dąbrowski ◽

Piotr Bednarski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽

Case Series ◽

En Bloc Resection ◽

Bloc Resection ◽

R0 Resection ◽

Safe Procedure ◽

Rectal Tumors ◽

En Bloc ◽

Submucosal Dissection ◽

Case Series Study

IntroductionNowadays, various endoscopic resections including polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are well known first-line approaches for early neoplastic rectal tumors.Material and methodsIn this case series study, we analyzed 320 ESD procedures performed in a high-volume colorectal center in Poland, Europe. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate ESD procedure in cases of rectal carcinoma performed by a single trained operator in a referral center provided with endoscopy.ResultsOverall, en bloc resection was observed in 92.5% of patients (296/320). The en bloc resection rate was at a similar level in those lesions with involved anal sphincters versus tumors without involvement (93.85% vs. 92.16%; p=0.644). R0 resection was noted in 89.4% of patients (286/320). The overall curative ESD rate was 85.94% (n=275). The curative ESD rate in the invasive cancer group reached 52.6% (n=20). We observed ESD-related adverse events, such as bleeding and perforation, in 3.4 % of patients (n=11).ConclusionsWe have demonstrated that ESD in rectal tumors is an efficient and safe procedure with a high curative rate, even in difficult lesions. Anal sphincter localization and recurrent character of the lesion have no impact on the final outcomes. The ESD approach should have been considered for all rectal tumors, especially those lesions suspected of superficial mucosal invasion, as it can serve as a staging method and may have been curative for adenomas and cancers limited to mucosa.

Download Full-text

The pocket-creation method may facilitate endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal sessile tumors

Endoscopy International Open ◽

10.1055/a-1190-7880 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 08 (08) ◽

pp. E1021-E1030

Author(s):

Takeshi Yamashina ◽

Yoshikazu Hayashi ◽

Hisashi Fukuda ◽

Masahiro Okada ◽

Takahito Takezawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽

En Bloc Resection ◽

Primary Outcome Measure ◽

Bloc Resection ◽

R0 Resection ◽

En Bloc ◽

Delayed Bleeding ◽

Submucosal Dissection ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Submucosal Fibrosis

Abstract Background and study aims Resecting large colorectal sessile tumors using endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is challenging because of severe submucosal fibrosis. Previously, we reported that ESD strategy using the pocket-creation method (PCM) is useful for large colorectal sessile tumors, but there are no large studies reporting the effectiveness and safety of the PCM for resection of large colorectal sessile tumors. Patients and methods This was a retrospective review of 90 large colorectal sessile tumors in 89 patients who underwent ESD in our institution. Large colorectal sessile tumors were defined as polypoid lesions 20 mm or more in diameter. We divided them into PCM (n = 40) and conventional method (CM) groups (n = 50). The primary outcome measure was en bloc resection. The inverse-probability-treatment weighting (IPTW) approach was used to adjust for selection bias. Results Both PCM and CM achieved high en bloc resection (100 % vs. 94 %, non-adjusted P = 0.25, IPTW-adjusted P = 0.19) and R0 resection rates (88 % vs. 78 %, non-adjusted P = 0.28, IPTW-adjusted P = 0.27). When PCM was used, the rate of pathologically negative vertical margins was significantly greater than with the CM (IPTW-adjusted P = 0.045). The dissection time was significantly shorter (IPTW-adjusted P = 0.025) and dissection speed faster (IPTW-adjusted P = 0.013) using the PCM than when the CM was used. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (intraprocedural perforation and delayed bleeding, IPTW-adjusted P = 0.68). Conclusion Although en bloc resection and R0 resection rates were similar, PCM significantly increased the rate of negative vertical margins with rapid dissection for treatment of large colorectal sessile tumors.

Download Full-text

Procedure Time for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection according to Location, considering Both Mucosal Circumferential Incision and Submucosal Dissection

Gastroenterology Research and Practice ◽

10.1155/2016/9183793 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 2016 ◽

pp. 1-11 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Hironori Konuma ◽

Kenshi Matsumoto ◽

Hiroya Ueyama ◽

Hiroyuki Komori ◽

Yoichi Akazawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽

Classification System ◽

Technical Difficulty ◽

Gastric Neoplasms ◽

R0 Resection ◽

Procedure Time ◽

En Bloc ◽

Submucosal Dissection ◽

Total Procedure Time ◽

Significant Difference

Background. Previous assessments of technical difficulty and procedure time for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric neoplasms did not take into account several critical determinants of these parameters. However, two key phases of ESD determine the total procedure time: the mucosal circumference incision speed (CIS) and submucosal dissection speed (SDS). Methods. We included 302 cases of en bloc and R0 resection of gastric neoplasms performed by 10 operators who had completed the training program at our hospital. Twelve locations were classified based on multiple criteria, such as condition of surrounding mucosa, lesion vascularity, presence of submucosal fat, ulcers, scars, fibrosis, and scope and device maneuverability. Lesions in different locations were classified into three groups based on the length of the procedure: fast, moderate, or late. Results. A significant difference was found in CIS and SDS for each location (p<0.01), which demonstrates the validity of this classification system. In several locations, CIS and SDS were not consistent with each other. Conclusion. CIS and SDS did not correspond to each other even for lesions in the same location. Consideration of ESD procedure time for gastric neoplasms requires a more elaborate classification system than that previously reported.

Download Full-text