scholarly journals Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neoplastic lesions: experience from a European center.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Spychalski ◽  
Marcin Włodarczyk ◽  
Jakub Włodarczyk ◽  
Igor Dąbrowski ◽  
Piotr Bednarski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Case Series ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Rectal Tumors ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Case Series Study

IntroductionNowadays, various endoscopic resections including polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are well known first-line approaches for early neoplastic rectal tumors.Material and methodsIn this case series study, we analyzed 320 ESD procedures performed in a high-volume colorectal center in Poland, Europe. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate ESD procedure in cases of rectal carcinoma performed by a single trained operator in a referral center provided with endoscopy.ResultsOverall, en bloc resection was observed in 92.5% of patients (296/320). The en bloc resection rate was at a similar level in those lesions with involved anal sphincters versus tumors without involvement (93.85% vs. 92.16%; p=0.644). R0 resection was noted in 89.4% of patients (286/320). The overall curative ESD rate was 85.94% (n=275). The curative ESD rate in the invasive cancer group reached 52.6% (n=20). We observed ESD-related adverse events, such as bleeding and perforation, in 3.4 % of patients (n=11).ConclusionsWe have demonstrated that ESD in rectal tumors is an efficient and safe procedure with a high curative rate, even in difficult lesions. Anal sphincter localization and recurrent character of the lesion have no impact on the final outcomes. The ESD approach should have been considered for all rectal tumors, especially those lesions suspected of superficial mucosal invasion, as it can serve as a staging method and may have been curative for adenomas and cancers limited to mucosa.

scholarly journals Endoscopic submucosal dissection of 301 large colorectal neoplasias: outcome and learning curve from a specialized center in Europe

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (11) ◽  
pp. E1340-E1348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl-Fredrik Rönnow ◽  
Noriya Uedo ◽  
Ervin Toth ◽  
Henrik Thorlacius
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasia ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
High Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Immediate Bleeding

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows en bloc resection of large colorectal lesions but ESD experience is limited outside Asia. This study evaluated implementation of ESD in the treatment of colorectal neoplasia in a Western center. Patients and methods Three hundred and one cases of colorectal ESD (173 rectal and 128 colonic lesions) were retrospectively evaluated in terms of outcome, learning curve and complications. Results Median size was 4 cm (range 1 – 12.5). En bloc resection was achieved in 241 cases amounting to an en bloc resection rate of 80 %. R0 resection was accomplished in 207 cases (69 %), RX and R1 were attained in 83 (27 %) and 11 (4 %) cases, respectively. Median time was 98 min (range 10 – 588) and median proficiency was 7.2 cm2/h. Complications occurred in 24 patients (8 %) divided into 12 immediate perforations, five delayed perforations, one immediate bleeding and six delayed bleedings. Six patients (2 %), all with proximal lesions, had emergency surgery. Two hundred and four patients were followed up endoscopically and median follow-up time was 13 months (range 3 – 53) revealing seven recurrences (3 %). En bloc rate improved gradually from 60 % during the first period to 98 % during the last period. ESD proficiency significantly improved between the first study period (3.6 cm2/h) and the last study period (10.8 cm2/h). Conclusions This study represents the largest material on colorectal ESD in the west and shows that colorectal ESD can be implemented in clinical routine in western countries after appropriate training and achieve a high rate of en bloc and R0 resection with a concomitant low incidence of complications. ESD of proximal colonic lesions should be attempted with caution during the learning curve because of higher risk of complications.

scholarly journals Multi-loop traction device facilitates gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: ex vivo pilot study and an inaugural clinical experience

2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Matsui ◽  
Naoto Tamai ◽  
Toshiki Futakuchi ◽  
Shunsuke Kamba ◽  
Akira Dobashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Traction Device

Abstract Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically difficult and requires considerable training. The authors have developed a multi-loop traction device (MLTD), a new traction device that offers easy attachment and detachment. We aimed to evaluate the utility of MLTD in ESD. Methods This ex vivo pilot study was a prospective, block-randomized, comparative study of a porcine stomach model. Twenty-four lesions were assigned to a group that undertook ESD using the MLTD (M-ESD group) and a group that undertook conventional ESD (C-ESD group) to compare the speed of submucosal dissection. In addition, the data of consecutive 10 patients with eleven gastric lesions was collected using electronic medical records to clarify the inaugural clinical outcomes of gastric ESD using MLTD. Results The median (interquartile range) speed of submucosal dissection in the M-ESD and C-ESD groups were 141.5 (60.9–177.6) mm2/min and 35.5 (20.8–52.3) mm2/min, respectively; submucosal dissection was significantly faster in the M-ESD group (p < 0.05). The rate of en bloc resection and R0 resection was 100% in both groups, and there were no perforation in either group. The MLTD attachment time was 2.5 ± 0.9 min and the MLTD extraction time was 1.0 ± 1.1 min. Clinical outcomes of MLTD in gastric ESD were almost the same as those of ex vivo pilot study. Conclusions MLTD increased the speed of submucosal dissection in ESD and was similarly effective when used by expert and trainee endoscopists without perforation. MLTD can potentially ensure a safer and faster ESD.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neoplasia: a multicenter North American experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (12) ◽  
pp. E1714-E1722
Author(s):  
Dennis Yang ◽  
Hiroyuki Aihara ◽  
Yaseen B. Perbtani ◽  
Andrew Y. Wang ◽  
Abdul Aziz Aadam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
American Experience ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Submucosal Fibrosis

Abstract Background and aims Rectal lesions traditionally represent the first lesions approached during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training in the West. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of rectal ESD in North America. Methods This is a multicenter retrospective analysis of rectal ESD between January 2010 and September 2018 in 15 centers. End points included: rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, adverse events, comparison of pre- and post-ESD histology, and factors associated with failed resection. Results In total, 171 patients (median age 63 years; 56 % men) underwent rectal ESD (median size 43 mm). En bloc resection was achieved in 141 cases (82.5 %; 95 %CI 76.8–88.2), including 24 of 27 (88.9 %) with prior failed endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). R0 resection rate was 74.9 % (95 %CI 68.4–81.4). Post-ESD bleeding and perforation occurred in 4 (2.3 %) and 7 (4.1 %), respectively. Covert submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC) was identified in 8.6 % of post-ESD specimens. There was one case (1/120; 0.8 %) of recurrence at a median follow-up of 31 weeks; IQR: 19–76 weeks). Older age and higher body mass index (BMI) were predictors of failed R0 resection, whereas submucosal fibrosis was associated with a higher likelihood of both failed en bloc and R0 resection. Conclusion Rectal ESD in North America is safe and is associated with high en bloc and R0 resection rates. The presence of submucosal fibrosis was the main predictor of failed en bloc and R0 resection. ESD can be considered for select rectal lesions, and serves not only to establish a definitive tissue diagnosis but also to provide curative resection for lesions with covert advanced disease.

scholarly journals Endoscopic submucosal dissection of malignant non-pedunculated colorectal lesions

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (08) ◽  
pp. E961-E968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl-Fredrik Rönnow ◽  
Jacob Elebro ◽  
Ervin Toth ◽  
Henrik Thorlacius
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Curative Resection ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Additional Surgery ◽  
Procedural Time

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an established method for en bloc resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions in Asia but dissemination of ESD in Western countries is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of ESD in the management of malignant non-pedunculated colorectal lesions in a European center. Patients and methods Among 255 patients undergoing colorectal ESD between 2014 and 2016, 29 cases were identified as submucosal invasive cancers and included in this study. The main outcomes were en bloc, R0 and curative resection as well as procedural time, complications and recurrence. Results Median tumor size was 40 mm (range 20 – 70 mm). Thirteen cancers were located in the colon and 16 were located in the rectum. Procedural time was 89 minutes (range 18 – 594 minutes). Complete resection was achieved in 28 cases, en bloc and R0 resection rates were 83 % and 69 %, respectively. Curative resection rate was 38 %. One case had a perforation in the sigmoid colon requiring emergency surgery. No significant bleeding occurred. Six patients underwent additional surgery after ESD, one of whom had residual tumor. One recurrence was detected in 20 patients that were followed-up endoscopically, median follow-up time was 13 months (range 2 – 30 months). Conclusion ESD seems to be a safe and effective method for treating non-pedunculated malignant colorectal lesions after careful patient selection and proper endoscopic training.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Neoplastic Lesions: An Italian, Multicenter Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 737
Author(s):  
Raffaele Manta ◽  
Giuseppe Galloro ◽  
Francesco Pugliese ◽  
Stefano Angeletti ◽  
Angelo Caruso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Gastric Lesions ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Neoplastic Lesions ◽  
One Year

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows removing neoplastic lesions on gastric mucosa, including early gastric cancer (EGC) and dysplasia. Data on ESD from Western countries are still scanty. We report results of ESD procedures performed in Italy. Data of consecutive patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplastic removal were analyzed. The en bloc resection rate and the R0 resection rates for all neoplastic lesions were calculated, as well as the curative rate (i.e., no need for surgical treatment) for EGC. The incidence of complications, the one-month mortality, and the recurrence rate at one-year follow-up were computed. A total of 296 patients with 299 gastric lesions (80 EGC) were treated. The en bloc resection was successful for 292 (97.6%) and the R0 was achieved in 266 (89%) out of all lesions. In the EGC group, the ESD was eventually curative in 72.5% (58/80) following procedure. A complication occurred in 30 (10.1%) patients. Endoscopic treatment was successful in all 3 perforations, whereas it failed in 2 out of 27 bleeding patients who were treated with radiological embolization (1 case) or surgery (1 case). No procedure-related deaths at one-month follow-up were observed. Lesion recurrence occurred in 16 (6.2%) patients (6 EGC and 10 dysplasia). In conclusion, the rate of both en bloc and R0 gastric lesions removal was very high in Italy. However, the curative rate for EGC needs to be improved. Complications were acceptably low and amenable at endoscopy.

scholarly journals The pocket-creation method may facilitate endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal sessile tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (08) ◽  
pp. E1021-E1030
Author(s):  
Takeshi Yamashina ◽  
Yoshikazu Hayashi ◽  
Hisashi Fukuda ◽  
Masahiro Okada ◽  
Takahito Takezawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Submucosal Fibrosis

Abstract Background and study aims Resecting large colorectal sessile tumors using endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is challenging because of severe submucosal fibrosis. Previously, we reported that ESD strategy using the pocket-creation method (PCM) is useful for large colorectal sessile tumors, but there are no large studies reporting the effectiveness and safety of the PCM for resection of large colorectal sessile tumors. Patients and methods This was a retrospective review of 90 large colorectal sessile tumors in 89 patients who underwent ESD in our institution. Large colorectal sessile tumors were defined as polypoid lesions 20 mm or more in diameter. We divided them into PCM (n = 40) and conventional method (CM) groups (n = 50). The primary outcome measure was en bloc resection. The inverse-probability-treatment weighting (IPTW) approach was used to adjust for selection bias. Results Both PCM and CM achieved high en bloc resection (100 % vs. 94 %, non-adjusted P = 0.25, IPTW-adjusted P = 0.19) and R0 resection rates (88 % vs. 78 %, non-adjusted P = 0.28, IPTW-adjusted P = 0.27). When PCM was used, the rate of pathologically negative vertical margins was significantly greater than with the CM (IPTW-adjusted P = 0.045). The dissection time was significantly shorter (IPTW-adjusted P = 0.025) and dissection speed faster (IPTW-adjusted P = 0.013) using the PCM than when the CM was used. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (intraprocedural perforation and delayed bleeding, IPTW-adjusted P = 0.68). Conclusion Although en bloc resection and R0 resection rates were similar, PCM significantly increased the rate of negative vertical margins with rapid dissection for treatment of large colorectal sessile tumors.

scholarly journals Pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. E123-E129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotsugu Sakamoto ◽  
Yoshikazu Hayashi ◽  
Yoshimasa Miura ◽  
Satoshi Shinozaki ◽  
Haruo Takahashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Novel Strategy ◽  
Laterally Spreading Tumors ◽  
Severe Fibrosis

Abstract Background and study aims The pocket-creation method (PCM) is a novel strategy for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of the PCM for colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type (LST-NG). Patients and methods The records of 126 consecutive patients with colorectal LST-NG who underwent ESD between April 2012 and July 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into PCM (n = 73) and conventional method (CM) (n = 53) groups. Results The en bloc resection rate in the PCM group was significantly higher than in the CM group (100 % [73/73] vs. 92 % [49/53], P = 0.03). The en bloc resection rate with severe fibrosis was higher in the PCM group than in the CM group (100 % [3/3] vs. 60 % [3/5]). The R0 resection rate for the two groups was not statistically significantly different (93 % [68/73] vs. 91 % [48/53], P = 0.74). The perforation rate in the PCM group was lower than in the CM group although not statistically significantly less (0 % 0/73 vs. 4 % 2/53, P = 0.18). For lesions resected en bloc, dissection speed for the PCM group was significantly faster than for the CM group (median [IQR], 19 [13 –24] vs. 14 [10 – 22] mm2/min, P = 0.03). Conclusion ESD using PCM achieves a reliable and safe resection of colorectal LST-NG.

scholarly journals A new traction method (traction ring) for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyuan Huang ◽  
Hui-Hong Zhai ◽  
Ming Ji ◽  
Peng Li ◽  
Yinglin Niu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Traction System

Abstract Background Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a challenging operation because it is often difficult to attain good visualization of the submucosal layer. Lots of traction methods have been developed to facilitate submucosal dissection, but still not widely applied. Therefore, we designed a new traction device "traction ring". This pilot study is to evaluate if traction ring is feasible and safe for colorectal ESD. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 20 patients with colorectal lesions who had undergone traction ring assisted ESD. The main outcome was the rate of en bloc resection, R0 resection rate, procedure time, resection time, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results The median procedure time was 74.5 min (range 35–269 min.). The median resection time was 55 min (range 25–209 min.). The application of the traction system accounting for only 2.7% of the whole procedure time. Rate of en bloc resection was 95% (19/20). Rate of R0 resections was 90% (18/20). All traction rings were successfully settled and retrieved. No serious excessive intraoperative bleeding was observed. One patient was found perforation after treatment, no further intervention was required. No delayed complications were observed within one month after the operation. Conclusions This retrospective study demonstrated that the new countertraction method (traction ring) may become a safe, effective and simple way to assist ESD for colorectal lesions.

scholarly journals Evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection using a new endosurgical knife DN-D2718B: a first clinical feasibility study

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (07) ◽  
pp. E670-E674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Sakaguchi ◽  
Yosuke Tsuji ◽  
Mitsuhiro Fujishiro ◽  
Yosuke Kataoka ◽  
Itaru Saito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Single Center ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Injection Function

Abstract Background and study aims Endosurgical devices with injection function have been reported to decrease endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) operation times for experts, but the efficacy of these devices for inexperienced endoscopists is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of ESD using a novel ESD knife (DN-D2718B). Patients and methods This is a single-center prospective pilot clinical feasibility study. Patients diagnosed with superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms were enrolled. A pre-specified group of ESD trainees with ESD experience on a porcine gastric model and fewer than 30 cases of ESD in their selected fields performed ESD under expert supervision, using the DN-D2718B. En bloc resection rates, R0 resection rates, procedure times, and incidence of intra-operational/post-operational adverse events were assessed. Results Between June 2015 and January 2016, 13 esophageal, 27 gastric, and 14 colorectal ESD cases were performed per-protocol with mean resection speeds of 10.2, 12.0, and 15.5 mm2/min, respectively. There were no intra-operational complications. Conclusion ESD with this novel knife is feasible even when performed by non-experts.

scholarly journals Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for Barrett’s esophagus (BE)-related early neoplasia after standard endoscopic management is feasible and safe

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. E498-E505
Author(s):  
Yutaka Tomizawa ◽  
Shai Friedland ◽  
Joo Ha Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Barrett’S Esophagus ◽  
Barrett's Esophagus ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Endoscopic Management ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background and study aims There is little data on the feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a salvage treatment for Barrett’s esophagus (BE)-related neoplasia after standard endoscopic treatments. Patients and methods A multicenter retrospective analysis on patients who underwent ESD for BE was performed. The primary endpoint was effectiveness of obtaining en-bloc resection in salvage as compared to non-salvage treatments. Results Median age was 71 (IQR 55 – 79) years. Twelve (37%) of 32 patients underwent salvage ESD. Median resection time was 100 (IQR 60 – 136) minutes. En-bloc resection was achieved in 31 patients (97 %). Complete R0 resection was obtained in 75 % in the salvage group and 80 % in the non-salvage group (P = 1.00). In seven patients (22 %), the pre-ESD diagnosis was upgraded on post-ESD histopathology (1 low-grade dysplasia to high grade dysplasia [HGD], 4 HGD to early esophageal carcinoma (EAC), and 2 intramucosal EAC to invasive EAC). No perforations occurred in either group. Two late adverse events occurred, both in the salvage group (P = 0.133). Delayed bleeding occurred in a patient who had just resumed warfarin and stricture occurred in a patient who had a circumferential resection requiring serial dilation and stent placement. Conclusions Our cohort study demonstrated that ESD as salvage therapy for BE related neoplasia is feasible and safe, achieving similar high rates of en-bloc resection and complete R0 resection as in treatment-naïve patients. Referral to an expert center performing ESD should be considered for patients with recurrence or progression following endoscopic mucosal resection or ablation therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document