Temporal envelope perception in Cochlear Implant users

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Timm ◽  
D Agrawal ◽  
M Wittfoth ◽  
R Dengler
2012 ◽  
Vol 132 (2) ◽  
pp. 1113-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Ho Won ◽  
Christian Lorenzi ◽  
Kaibao Nie ◽  
Xing Li ◽  
Elyse M. Jameyson ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 771-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth E. Hancock ◽  
Yoojin Chung ◽  
Martin F. McKinney ◽  
Bertrand Delgutte

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Gransier ◽  
Robert P. Carlyon ◽  
Jan Wouters

Abstract Cochlear-implant (CI) users rely on temporal envelope modulations (TEMs) to understand speech, and clinical outcomes depend on the accuracy with which these TEMs are encoded by the electrically-stimulated neural ensembles. Non-invasive EEG measures of this encoding could help clinicians identify and disable electrodes that evoke poor neural responses so as to improve CI outcomes. However, recording EEG during CI stimulation reveals huge stimulation artifacts that are up to orders of magnitude larger than the neural response. Here we used a custom-built EEG system having an exceptionally high sample rate to accurately measure the artefact, which we then removed using linear interpolation so as to reveal the neural response during continuous electrical stimulation. In ten adult CI users, we measured the 40-Hz electrically evoked auditory steady-state response (eASSR) and electrically evoked auditory change complex (eACC) to amplitude-modulated 900-pulses-per-second pulse trains, stimulated in monopolar mode (i.e. the clinical default), and at different modulation depths. We successfully measured artifact-free 40-Hz eASSRs and eACCs. Moreover, we found that the 40-Hz eASSR, in contrast to the eACC, showed substantial responses even at shallow modulation depths. We argue that the 40-Hz eASSR is a clinically feasible objective measure to assess TEM encoding in CI users.


2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. 4325-4326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hartmut Meister ◽  
Katrin Fuersen ◽  
Barbara Streicher ◽  
Ruth Lang-Roth ◽  
Martin Walger

Purpose The purpose of this letter is to compare results by Skuk et al. (2020) with Meister et al. (2016) and to point to a potential general influence of stimulus type. Conclusion Our conclusion is that presenting sentences may give cochlear implant recipients the opportunity to use timbre cues for voice perception. This might not be the case when presenting brief and sparse stimuli such as consonant–vowel–consonant or single words, which were applied in the majority of studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document