Factors Predicting Recurrence after Resection of Clival Chordoma using Variable Surgical Approaches and Radiation Modalities

Author(s):  
Arman Jahangiri ◽  
Aaron Chin ◽  
Jeffrey Wagner ◽  
Sandeep Kunwar ◽  
Christopher Ames ◽  
...  
Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. E32-E32
Author(s):  
Arman Jahangiri ◽  
Aaron T. Chin ◽  
Jeffrey R. Wagner ◽  
Sandeep Kunwar ◽  
Christopher Ames ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arman Jahangiri ◽  
Aaron T. Chin ◽  
Jeffrey R. Wagner ◽  
Sandeep Kunwar ◽  
Christopher Ames ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Clival chordomas frequently recur because of their location and invasiveness. OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinical, operative, and anatomic factors associated with clival chordoma recurrence. METHODS: Retrospective review of clival chordomas treated at our center from 1993 to 2013. RESULTS: Fifty patients (56% male) with median age of 59 years (range, 8–76) were newly diagnosed with clival chordoma of mean diameter 3.3 cm (range, 1.5-6.7). Symptoms included headaches (38%), diplopia (36%), and dysphagia (14%). Procedures included transsphenoidal (n = 34), transoral (n = 4), craniotomy (n = 5), and staged approaches (n = 7). Gross total resection (GTR) rate was 52%, with 83% mean volumetric reduction, values that improved over time. While the lower third of the clivus was the least likely superoinferior zone to contain tumor (upper third = 72%/middle third = 82%/lower third = 42%), it most frequently contained residual tumor (upper third = 33%/middle third = 38%/lower third = 63%; P < .05). Symptom improvement rates were 61% (diplopia) and 53% (headache). Postoperative radiation included proton beam (n = 19), cyberknife (n = 7), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (n = 6), external beam (n = 10), and none (n = 4). At last follow-up of 47 patients, 23 (49%) remain disease-free or have stable residual tumor. Lower third of clivus progressed most after GTR (upper/mid/lower third = 32%/41%/75%). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, male gender (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.2/P = .03), subtotal resection (HR = 5.0/P = .02), and the preoperative presence of tumor in the middle third (HR = 1.2/P = .02) and lower third (HR = 1.8/P = .02) of the clivus increased further growth or regrowth, while radiation modality did not. CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore long-standing support for GTR as reducing chordoma recurrence. The lower third of the clivus frequently harbored residual or recurrent tumor, despite staged approaches providing mediolateral (transcranial + endonasal) or superoinferior (endonasal + transoral) breadth. There was no benefit of proton-based over photon-based radiation, contradicting conventional presumptions.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. E28-E31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Xiang Zou ◽  
Guo-Hua Lv ◽  
Xiao-Bin Wang ◽  
Jing Li

1993 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Y. Wen ◽  
Roberto C. Heros

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartanusz ◽  
Porchet

The treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression is complex. The three treatment modalities that are currently applied (in a histologically non-specific manner) are surgery, radiotherapy and the administration of steroids. The development of new spinal instrumentations and surgical approaches considerably changed the extent of therapeutic options in this field. These new surgical techniques have made it possible to resect these tumours totally, with subsequent vertebral reconstruction and spinal stabilization. In this respect, it is important to clearly identify those patients who can benefit from such an extensive surgery. We present our management algorithm to help select patients for surgery and at the same time identifying those for whom primary non-surgical therapy would be indicated. The retrospective review of surgically treated patients in our department in the last four years reveals a meagre application of conventional guidelines for the selection of the appropriate operative approach in the surgical management of these patients. The reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 74 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco A. Filho ◽  
Rodrigo Cavalcante ◽  
Milton Rastelli ◽  
Omar Ramirez ◽  
Alessandro Paluzzi ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 76 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Zoli ◽  
Diego Mazzatenta ◽  
Adelaide Valluzzi ◽  
Pasquini Ernesto ◽  
Giorgio Frank

2015 ◽  
Vol 76 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Jacob ◽  
Aditya Raghunathan ◽  
Joshua Hughes ◽  
Jeffrey Janus ◽  
Caterina Giannini ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salman Al Qazlan ◽  
Muath Alfallaj ◽  
Mody Almarshad ◽  
Abdullah Alobaid

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document