scholarly journals The Role of Prophylactic Octreotide Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy to Prevent Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 04 (04) ◽  
pp. e182-e187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pankaj Garg ◽  
Jyoti Sharma ◽  
Ashish Jakhetiya ◽  
Nilokali Chishi
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
P Value ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Statistical Heterogeneity

Introduction A postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). A pharmacologic approach using perioperative octreotide, a long-acting somatostatin analog having an inhibitory action on pancreatic exocrine secretion, was proposed to reduce the incidence of the POPF. Despite contradictory results in various randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the prophylactic octreotide has been widely used in the last two decades to reduce the POPF. The present meta-analysis aims to assess the effectiveness of the prophylactic octreotide in preventing the POPF following PD. Methods A literature search was performed in the PubMed for the RCTs that compared the prophylactic octreotide with the placebo following PD published prior to October 2016. Review manager (Cochrane Collaboration's software) version RevMan 5.2 was used for analysis. Those RCTs which had compared the prophylactic Octreotide with placebo to reduce the POPF following PD were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The low quality (Jadad score of two or less) RCTs or those including mixed pancreatic resections without reporting specific pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes were excluded. The effect size for the dichotomous and the continuous data was displayed as the odds ratio (OR) and the weighted mean difference (WMD), respectively, with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). A fixed effect or random effects model was used to pool the data according to the result of a statistical heterogeneity test. The heterogeneity between the studies was evaluated using the Cochran Q statistic and the I 2 test, with p < 0.05 indicating significant heterogeneity. Results There were eight RCTs available for the analysis. A total of 959 patients were included in the meta-analysis–492 received the prophylactic octreotide and 467 patients received the placebo. The prophylactic octreotide was not found to significantly decrease the total number of the POPF (OR, 1.03'; 95% CI: 0.73–1.45; p-value 0.85) or the clinically significant POPF (OR, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.35–1.65; p-value 0.49) compared with the placebo. There was also no difference in the duration of hospital stay (WMD, 1.19; 95% CI:1.84–4.23; p-value 0.44) or the postoperative mortality (OR, 2.04; 95% CI: 0.87–4.78; p-value 0.10) between the two groups. The prophylactic octreotide was also not found to significantly delay the gastric emptying (OR, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.41–1.40; p-value 0.38). Conclusion The present meta-analysis does not support the role of the prophylactic octreotide to prevent the POPF following PD.

scholarly journals SP7.1.3 An integrated and upgraded meta-analysis of published randomized, controlled trials exploring the role of oral metronidazole as post-operative proctological analgesic agent

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saad Rehman ◽  
Moaz Hamid ◽  
Karim Iqbal ◽  
Kausik Ray ◽  
Parv Sains ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Analgesic Agent ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Oral Metronidazole

Abstract Aims Proctological procedures such as haemorrhoidectomy have been reported with significant post-operative pain affecting quality of life as well as capacity to perform daily activities. The objective of this article is to explore the role of conventionally used antibiotic metronidazole as a proctological analgesic. Methods A systematic review of the randomized, controlled trials reporting the use of oral metronidazole as post-operative proctological analgesic agent in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy published on Embase, Medline, PubMed, PubMed Central and Cochrane databases was performed using the principles of meta-analysis. Results A total of eight randomized, controlled trials on 447 patients were included in this study. In the random effects model analysis using the statistical software Review Manager, the use of oral metronidazole as a post-operative proctological analgesic agent was significantly associated with the reduced pain score on day 1 (Standardized mean difference (SMD), -0.56; 95% CI, -1.04, -0.07; z = 2.26; P = 0.02), day 3 (SMD, -0.82; 95% CI, -1.33, -0.31; z = 3.15; P = 0.002) and day 7 (SMD, -1.48; 95% CI, -2.51, -0.45; z = 2.82; P = 0.005). There was significant heterogeneity (Tau2 = 0.39, chi2 = 38.38, df = 7, [p = 0.00001]; I2 = 82 %) among included studies. Conclusion The use of oral metronidazole as a post-operative proctological analgesic agent following haemorrhoidectomy seems to have proven clinical advantages and may routinely be used.

scholarly journals Association Between Vitamin D and Influenza: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhixin Zhu ◽  
Xiaoxia Zhu ◽  
Lanfang Gu ◽  
Yancen Zhan ◽  
Liang Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Study Finding ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Statistical Heterogeneity

Background: Vitamin D supplementation improves the immune function of human body and can be a convenient way to prevent influenza. However, evidence on the protective effect of vitamin D supplementation on influenza from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) is inconclusive.Methods: RCTs regarding the association between vitamin D supplementation and influenza were identified by searching PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) from inception until present (last updated on 10 November 2021). Studies that reported dosages and durations of vitamin D supplementation and number of influenza infections could be included. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics, the meta-analysis was conducted by using a random-effects model, the pooled effects were expressed with risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI).Results: 10 trials including 4859 individuals were ultimately eligible after scanning. There was no evidence of a significant heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 27%, P = 0.150). Meta-regression analysis finding indicated that country, latitude, average age, economic level, follow-up period and average daily vitamin D intake did not cause the statistical heterogeneity. The study finding indicates that substitution with vitamin D significantly reduces the risk of influenza infections (RR = 0.78, 95% CI:0.64–0.95). No evidence of publication bias was observed. Omission of any single trial had little impact on the pooled risk estimates.Conclusions: The meta-analysis produced a corroboration that vitamin D supplement has a preventive effect on influenza. Strategies for preventing influenza can be optimized by vitamin D supplementation.

scholarly journals Vitamin D supplementation, COVID-19 and disease severity: a meta-analysis

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Shah ◽  
D Saxena ◽  
D Mavalankar
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Objective: Current meta-analysis aims to understand the effect of oral supplementation of vitamin D on intensive care unit (ICU) requirement and mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods: Databases PubMed, preprint servers, and google scholar were searched from December 2019 to December 2020. Authors searched for the articles assessing role of vitamin D supplementation on COVID-19. Cochrane RevMan tool was used for quantitative assessment of the data, where heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and Q statistics and data was expressed using odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. Results: Final meta-analysis involved pooled data of 532 hospitalized patients (189 on vitamin D supplementation and 343 on usual care/placebo) of COVID-19 from three studies (Two randomized controlled trials, one retrospective case-control study). Statistically (p&lt;0.0001) lower ICU requirement was observed in patients with vitamin D supplementation as compared to patients without supplementations (odds ratio: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.210-0.626). However, it suffered from significant heterogeneity, which reduced after sensitivity analysis. In case of mortality, vitamin D supplements has comparable findings with placebo treatment/usual care (odds ratio: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.413-2.113; p=0.87). The studies did not show any publication bias and had fair quality score. Subgroup analysis could not be performed due to limited number of studies and hence dose and duration dependent effect of vitamin D could not be evaluated. Conclusions: Although the current meta-analysis findings indicate potential role of vitamin D in improving COVID-19 severity in hospitalized patients, more robust data from randomized controlled trials are needed to substantiate its effects on mortality.

Mechanical Thromboprophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 402-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Limpus ◽  
Wendy Chaboyer ◽  
Ellen McDonald ◽  
Lukman Thalib
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Intensive Care Patients ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Confounding Variables

• Objective To systematically review the randomized trials, observational studies, and survey evidence on compression and pneumatic devices for thromboprophylaxis in intensive care patients. • Methods Published studies on the use of compression and pneumatic devices in intensive care patients were assessed. A meta-analysis was conducted by using the randomized controlled trials. • Results A total of 21 relevant studies (5 randomized controlled trials, 13 observational studies, and 3 surveys) were found. A total of 811 patients were randomized in the 5 randomized controlled trials; 3421 patients participated in the observational studies. Trauma patients only were enrolled in 4 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational studies. Meta-analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials with similar populations and outcomes revealed that use of compression and pneumatic devices did not reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism. The pooled risk ratio was 2.37, indicative of favoring the control over the intervention in reducing the deep venous thrombosis; however, the 95% CI of 0.57 to 9.90 indicated no significant differences between the intervention and the control. A range of methodological issues, including bias and confounding variables, make meaningful interpretation of the observational studies difficult. • Conclusions The limited evidence suggests that use of compressive and pneumatic devices yields results not significantly different from results obtained with no treatment or use of low-molecular-weight heparin. Until large randomized controlled trials are conducted, the role of mechanical approaches to thromboprophylaxis for intensive care patients remains uncertain.

Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in Traumatic Brain Injury – A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 1225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanwaljeet Garg ◽  
PreetM Singh ◽  
Raghav Singla ◽  
Ankita Aggarwal ◽  
Anuradha Borle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Decompressive Craniectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document