Appropriate Timing for Evaluation of the Short-Term Effectiveness of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Inui ◽  
Shuji Taketomi ◽  
Ryota Yamagami ◽  
Kenichi Kono ◽  
Kohei Kawaguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Significant Recovery ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Early Revision ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Patient Reported

AbstractSatisfactory results have been achieved with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for the treatment of isolated unicompartmental knee disease. However, UKA is associated with a significantly higher rate of revision. There is a tendency toward early revision of UKA for persistent pain because surgeons are not aware that outcomes can spontaneously improve with time. The aim of this study was to identify the time period that patients achieved the highest clinical outcomes following UKA. In total, we examined 72 knees that underwent Oxford UKA. We evaluated the range of motion and clinical results including Knee Society Knee Score, Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), and patient-reported scores using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively. The extension angle showed significant recovery from 1 to 2 years postoperatively, but no significant recovery was observed between 2 and 3 years. The flexion angle at 2 years is larger than at 1 year. The KSFS at 3 years is significantly lower than that at 1 year. The KOOS subscale of activities of daily living showed no significant differences among three periods after operation. The subscales of pain, symptom, sports, and quality of life showed significant recovery from 1 to 2 years postoperatively, but no significant recovery was observed from 2 to 3 years. To evaluate the effectiveness of Oxford UKA, surgeons should obtain clinical outcomes 2 years after the operation

scholarly journals Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: five-year clinical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (6) ◽  
pp. 1088-1095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Banger ◽  
James Doonan ◽  
Philip Rowe ◽  
Bryn Jones ◽  
Angus MacLean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Robotic Arm ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Patient Reported

Aims Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a bone-preserving treatment option for osteoarthritis localized to a single compartment in the knee. The success of the procedure is sensitive to patient selection and alignment errors. Robotic arm-assisted UKA provides technological assistance to intraoperative bony resection accuracy, which is thought to improve ligament balancing. This paper presents the five-year outcomes of a comparison between manual and robotically assisted UKAs. Methods The trial design was a prospective, randomized, parallel, single-centre study comparing surgical alignment in patients undergoing UKA for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis (ISRCTN77119437). Participants underwent surgery using either robotic arm-assisted surgery or conventional manual instrumentation. The primary outcome measure (surgical accuracy) has previously been reported, and, along with secondary outcomes, were collected at one-, two-, and five-year timepoints. Analysis of five-year results and longitudinal analysis for all timepoints was performed to compare the two groups. Results Overall, 104 (80%) patients of the original 130 who received surgery were available at five years (55 robotic, 49 manual). Both procedures reported successful results over all outcomes. At five years, there were no statistical differences between the groups in any of the patient reported or clinical outcomes. There was a lower reintervention rate in the robotic arm-assisted group with 0% requiring further surgery compared with six (9%) of the manual group requiring additional surgical intervention (p < 0.001). Conclusion This study has shown excellent clinical outcomes in both groups with no statistical or clinical differences in the patient-reported outcome measures. The notable difference was the lower reintervention rate at five years for roboticarm-assisted UKA when compared with a manual approach. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1088–1095.

scholarly journals High usage of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty negatively influences total knee arthroplasty revision rate

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Klasan ◽  
Mei Lin Tay ◽  
Chris Frampton ◽  
Simon William Young
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Rate ◽  
Oxford Knee Score ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Purpose Surgeons with higher medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) usage have lower UKA revision rates. However, an increase in UKA usage may cause a decrease of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) usage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of UKA usage on revision rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of UKA, TKA, and combined UKA + TKA results. Methods Using the New Zealand Registry Database, surgeons were divided into six groups based on their medial UKA usage: < 1%, 1–5%, 5–10%, 10–20%, 20–30% and > 30%. A comparison of UKA, TKA and UKA + TKA revision rates and PROMs using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was performed. Results A total of 91,895 knee arthroplasties were identified, of which 8,271 were UKA (9.0%). Surgeons with higher UKA usage had lower UKA revision rates, but higher TKA revision rates. The lowest TKA and combined UKA + TKA revision rates were observed for surgeons performing 1–5% UKA, compared to the highest TKA and UKA + TKA revision rates which were seen for surgeons using > 30% UKA (p < 0.001 TKA; p < 0.001 UKA + TKA). No clinically important differences in UKA + TKA OKS scores were seen between UKA usage groups at 6 months, 5 years, or 10 years. Conclusion Surgeons with higher medial UKA usage have lower UKA revision rates; however, this comes at the cost of a higher combined UKA + TKA revision rate that is proportionate to the UKA usage. There was no difference in TKA + UKA OKS scores between UKA usage groups. A small increase in TKA revision rate was observed for high-volume UKA users (> 30%), when compared to other UKA usage clusters. A significant decrease in UKA revision rate observed in high-volume UKA surgeons offsets the slight increase in TKA revision rate, suggesting that UKA should be performed by specialist UKA surgeons. Level of evidence III, Retrospective therapeutic study.

scholarly journals Clinical Results of Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

2008 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-638
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Fukumoto ◽  
Kazutoshi Nomura ◽  
Noburo Hashimoto ◽  
Satoshi Maeda ◽  
Haruhiko Chuma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document