Effect of Manual versus Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty on Cervical Spine Static and Dynamic Postures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Y. Scholl ◽  
Emily L. Hampp ◽  
Vincent Alipit ◽  
Nipun Sodhi ◽  
Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Repetition Rate ◽  
Anatomical Landmarks ◽  
Repetitive Motion ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Times

AbstractThis study compared surgeon cervical (C) spine postures and repetitive motions when performing traditional manual total knee arthroplasty (MTKA) versus robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA). Surgeons wore motion trackers on T3 vertebra and the occiput anatomical landmarks to obtain postural and repetitive motion data during MTKA and RATKA performed on cadavers. We assessed (1) flexion–extension at T3 and the occiput anatomical landmarks, (2) range of motion (ROM) as the percentage of time in the flexion–extension angle, (3) repetition rate, defined as the number of the times T3 and the occiput flexion-extension angle exceeded ±10°; and (4) static posture, where T3 or occiput postures exceed 10° for more than 30 seconds. The average T3 flexion–extension angle for MTKA cases was 5-degree larger than for RATKA cases (19 ± 8 vs. 14 ± 8 degrees). The surgeons who performed MTKA cases spent 15% more time in nonneutral C-spine ROM than those who performed RATKA cases (78 ± 25 vs. 63 ± 36%, p < 0.01). The repetition rate at T3 was 4% greater for MTKA than RATKA (14 ± 5 vs. 10 ± 6 reps/min). The percentage of time spent in static T3 posture was 5% greater for overall MTKA cases than for RATKA cases (15 ± 3 vs. 10 ± 3%). In this cadaveric study, we found differences in cervical and thoracic ergonomics between manual and robotic–assisted TKA. Specifically, we found that RATKA may reduce a surgeon's ergonomic strain at both the T3 and occiput locations by reducing the time the surgeon spends in a nonneutral position.

The Learning Curve Associated with Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (01) ◽  
pp. 017-021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nipun Sodhi ◽  
Anton Khlopas ◽  
Nicolas Piuzzi ◽  
Assem Sultan ◽  
Robert Marchand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Similar Time ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Times ◽  
Time Frames

AbstractAs with most new surgical technologies, there is an associated learning curve with robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) before surgeons can expect ease of use to be similar to that of manual cases. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to (1) assess robotic-assisted versus manual operative times of two joint reconstructive surgeons separately as well as (2) find an overall learning curve. A total of 240 robotic-assisted TKAs performed by two board-certified surgeons were analyzed. The cases were sequentially grouped into 20 cases and a learning curve was created based on mean operative times. For each surgeon, mean operative times for their first 20 and last 20 robotic-assisted cases were compared with 20 randomly selected manual cases performed by that surgeon as controls prior to the initiation of the robotic-assisted cases. Each of the surgeons first 20 robotic assisted, last 20 robotic assisted, and 20 controls were then combined to create 3 cohorts of 40 cases for analysis. Surgeon 1: First and last robotic cohort operative times were 81 and 70 minutes (p < 0.05). Mean operative times for the first 20 robotic-assisted cases and manual cases were 81 versus 68 minutes (p < 0.05). Mean operative times for the last 20 robotic-assisted cases and manual cases were 70 versus 68 minutes (p > 0.05). Surgeon 2: First and last robotic cohort operative times were 117 and 98 minutes (p < 0.05). Mean operative times for the first 20 robotic-assisted cases and manual cases were 117 versus 95 (p < 0.05). Mean operative times for the last 20 robotic-cohort cases and manual cases were 98 versus 95 (p > 0.05). A similar trend occurred when the times of two surgeons were combined. The data from this study effectively create a learning curve for the use of robotic-assisted TKA. As both surgeons completed their total cases numbers within similar time frames, these data imply that within a few months, a board-certified orthopaedic joint arthroplasty surgeon should be able to adequately perform robotic TKA without adding any operative times.

A cautionary case: osteoporotic femur fracture after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. E. Skibicki ◽  
D. Y. Ponzio ◽  
J. A. Brustein ◽  
Z. D. Post ◽  
A. C. Ong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Femur Fracture ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Total Knee

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves the outlier of rotational alignment of the tibial prosthesis using 3DCT measurements

The Knee ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 64-76
Author(s):  
Takao Kaneko ◽  
Tadashi Igarashi ◽  
Kazutaka Takada ◽  
Shu Yoshizawa ◽  
Hiroyasu Ikegami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Rotational Alignment ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Bone Cement Solidifiliation Influence the Limb Alignment and Gap Balance during TKA

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongquan Shi ◽  
Xingquan Xu ◽  
Anyun Guo ◽  
Jin Dai ◽  
Zhihong Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Cement ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Mechanical Axis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Mechanical Alignment ◽  
Early Loosening ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Total Knee

Introduction. Mechanical alignment deviation after total knee arthroplasty is a major reason for early loosening of the prosthesis. Achieving optimum cement penetration during fixation of the femoral and tibial component is an essential step in performing a successful total knee arthroplasty. Bone cement is used to solidify the bone and prosthesis. Thickness imbalance of bone cement leads to the deviation of mechanical alignment. To estimate the influence of bone cement, a retrospective study was conducted.Materials and Methods. A total of 36 subjects were studied. All the TKA were performed following the standard surgical protocol for navigated surgery by medial approach with general anaesthesia. Prostheses were fixed by bone cement.Results. We compared the mechanical axis, flexion/extension, and gap balance before and after cementation. All the factors were different compared with those before and after cementation. Internal rotation was reached with statistical significance (P=0.03).Conclusion. Bone cement can influence the mechanical axis, flexion/extension, and gap balance. It also can prompt us to make a change when poor knee kinematics were detected before cementation.

Difficult Cases in Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (01) ◽  
pp. 027-037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Marchand ◽  
Anton Khlopas ◽  
Nipun Sodhi ◽  
Caitlin Condrey ◽  
Nicolas Piuzzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Valgus Deformity ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Surgical Technology ◽  
Flexion Contractures ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Robotic Devices ◽  
Sagittal Deformity

AbstractSagittal deformity of the knee is commonly corrected to neutral biomechanical axis (±3 degrees) during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which is a widely accepted goal. Recent advances in surgical technology have made it possible to accurately plan and fulfill these goals. One of these is robotic-assisted TKA, which has been noted to help increase accuracy and precision of restoring a neutral mechanical axis. While there are data confirming the ability of robotic devices to better correct knee alignment than the manual technique, there is a lack of data concerning the use of the robotic devices in more complex cases, such as those in patients with severe varus or valgus deformity, as well as in flexion contractures. Therefore, the purpose of this case study is to present three cases in which the robotic-assisted TKA device was used to correct a severe varus and severe valgus deformities. Based on this case series, it should be noted that the robotic device can also help correct severe varus/valgus deformities and flexion contractures.

Results of Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty at 2-Year Follow-up

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin B. Marchand ◽  
Rachel Moody ◽  
Laura Y. Scholl ◽  
Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker ◽  
Kelly B. Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Medical Complications ◽  
Womac Pain ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Surgical Data ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractRobotic-assisted technology has been developed to optimize the consistency and accuracy of bony cuts, implant placements, and knee alignments for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With recently developed designs, there is a need for the reporting longer than initial patient outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare manual and robotic-assisted TKA at 2-year minimum for: (1) aseptic survivorship; (2) reduced Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (r-WOMAC) pain, physical function, and total scores; (3) surgical and medical complications; and (4) radiographic assessments for progressive radiolucencies. We compared 80 consecutive cementless robotic-assisted to 80 consecutive cementless manual TKAs. Patient preoperative r-WOMAC and demographics (e.g., age, sex, and body mass index) were not found to be statistically different. Surgical data and medical records were reviewed for aseptic survivorship, medical, and surgical complications. Patients were administered an r-WOMAC survey preoperatively and at 2-year postoperatively. Mean r-WOMAC pain, physical function, and total scores were tabulated and compared using Student's t-tests. Radiographs were reviewed serially throughout patient's postoperative follow-up. A p < 0.05 was considered significant. The aseptic failure rates were 1.25 and 5.0% for the robotic-assisted and manual cohorts, respectively. Patients in the robotic-assisted cohort had significantly improved 2-year postoperative r-WOMAC mean pain (1 ± 2 vs. 2 ± 3 points, p = 0.02), mean physical function (2 ± 3 vs. 4 ± 5 points, p = 0.009), and mean total scores (4 ± 5 vs, 6 ± 7 points, p = 0.009) compared with the manual TKA. Surgical and medical complications were similar in the two cohorts. Only one patient in the manual cohort had progressive radiolucencies on radiographic assessment. Robotic-assisted TKA patients demonstrated improved 2-year postoperative outcomes when compared with manual patients. Further studies could include multiple surgeons and centers to increase the generalizability of these results. The results of this study indicate that patients who undergo robotic-assisted TKA may have improved 2-year postoperative outcomes.

Continuous Passive Motion Not Affect the Knee Motion and the Surgical wound Aspect After Total Knee Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergi Gil-Gonzalez ◽  
Ricardo Andrés Barja Rodriguez ◽  
Antoni Lopez Pujol ◽  
Hussein Berjaoui ◽  
Jose Enrique Fernandez Bengoa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Continuous Passive Motion ◽  
Surgical Wound ◽  
Knee Motion ◽  
Passive Motion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background. This study aimed to assess whether use of continuous passive motion (CPM) can improve range of motion in patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Moreover, the relationship between the use of CPM with the surgical wound aspect (SWA) and pain management after TKA was analysed.Methods. We randomized 210 patients, 102 patients in the CPM group, who received a standard rehabilitation protocol together with CPM application; and 108 patients in the no-CPM group, without CPM. Variables as knee motion (flexion, extension, range of motion) and pain was measured before surgery, on the 1s, 2nd and 3rd postoperative day, and in the 2nd, 6th, 12th and 24th postoperative weeks following TKA. The SWA was determined by the “surgical wound aspect score” (SWAS) in the next 48 hours after surgery. This scale analyses swelling, erythema, haematoma, blood drainage and blisters. Results. There was an improvement in the knee motion over the course of follow-up in both groups, without significant difference in flexion parameter. We found no significant differences in the total score of SWA, except for haematoma, with less severity in the CPM group. Furthermore, we found no differences in the others SWAS parameters and pain. Conclusions. The application of CPM does not provide benefit to our patients undergoing TKA in terms of either improved flexion mobility or decreased pain. No relationship was found between the use of CPM and the global score of SWA following a TKA, except for a decrease in haematoma appearance.

scholarly journals Less iatrogenic soft-tissue damage utilizing robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty when compared with a manual approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 495-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily L. Hampp ◽  
Nipun Sodhi ◽  
Laura Scholl ◽  
Matthew E. Deren ◽  
Zachary Yenna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Tissue Damage ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Soft Tissue Damage ◽  
Anatomical Structures ◽  
Cruciate Retaining ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Total Knee

Objectives The use of the haptically bounded saw blades in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) can potentially help to limit surrounding soft-tissue injuries. However, there are limited data characterizing these injuries for cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA with the use of this technique. The objective of this cadaver study was to compare the extent of soft-tissue damage sustained through a robotic-assisted, haptically guided TKA (RATKA) versus a manual TKA (MTKA) approach. Methods A total of 12 fresh-frozen pelvis-to-toe cadaver specimens were included. Four surgeons each prepared three RATKA and three MTKA specimens for cruciate-retaining TKAs. A RATKA was performed on one knee and a MTKA on the other. Postoperatively, two additional surgeons assessed and graded damage to 14 key anatomical structures in a blinded manner. Kruskal–Wallis hypothesis tests were performed to assess statistical differences in soft-tissue damage between RATKA and MTKA cases. Results Significantly less damage occurred to the PCLs in the RATKA versus the MTKA specimens (p < 0.001). RATKA specimens had non-significantly less damage to the deep medial collateral ligaments (p = 0.149), iliotibial bands (p = 0.580), poplitei (p = 0.248), and patellar ligaments (p = 0.317). The remaining anatomical structures had minimal soft-tissue damage in all MTKA and RATKA specimens. Conclusion The results of this study indicate that less soft-tissue damage may occur when utilizing RATKA compared with MTKA. These findings are likely due to the enhanced preoperative planning with the robotic software, the real-time intraoperative feedback, and the haptically bounded saw blade, all of which may help protect the surrounding soft tissues and ligaments. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2019;8:495–501. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.810.BJR-2019-0129.R1.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document