Cervical Cerclage Prevents Umbilical Cord Prolapse in Cases with Persistent Funic Presentation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Petrikovsky ◽  
M. Terrani ◽  
L. Sichinava
2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-112
Author(s):  
B. Petrikovsky ◽  
M. Terrani ◽  
A. Dillon ◽  
L. Sichinava

Objective: Umbilical cord prolapse is a rare event complicating 0.17%–0.62% of all pregnancies. Funic presentation is a known risk factor for umbilical cord prolapse. Currently, there is no strategy to prevent umbilical cord prolapse in patients with funic presentation. The novel technique used is placement of late cervical cerclage to create a mechanical barrier and prevent an umbilical cord prolapse. Methods: Six patients with a sonographically detected funic presentation were included in the study. Funic presentation was defined as the sonographic presence of the umbilical cord below the presenting part using both transabdominal and transvaginal sonography. Cord prolapse was defined as an umbilical cord seen or palpated below the presenting part. Cervical cerclage was placed in patients with persistent funic presentations, which is the detection of the umbilical cord below the presenting part, on two or more sonograms at least a week apart. Results: Cervical cerclages were placed in six patients with funic presentation between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation without immediate complications. All patients were delivered by a cesarean section between 35 and 38 weeks of pregnancy. None experienced umbilical cord prolapse. Funic presentation was confirmed at birth in all cases. Apgar scores varied between 7 and 10. Conclusion: It appears that cervical cerclage may be an effective measure to prevent umbilical cord prolapse in cases of known persistent funic presentation.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e046616
Author(s):  
Rokuhiro Asahina ◽  
Hiroyuki Tsuda ◽  
Yuki Nishiko ◽  
Kazuya Fuma ◽  
Momoko Kuribayashi ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the success rate of vaginal delivery, the reasons for unplanned caesarean delivery, the rate of umbilical cord prolapse and the risk of umbilical cord prolapse in twin deliveries.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingSingle institution.ParticipantsThis study included 455 women pregnant with twins (307 dichorionic and 148 monochorionic) who attempted vaginal delivery from January 2009 to August 2018. The following criteria were considered for vaginal delivery: diamniotic twins, cephalic presentation of the first twin, no history of uterine scar, no other indications for caesarean delivery, no major structural abnormality in either twin and no fetal aneuploidy.ResultsThe rate of vaginal delivery of both twins was 89.5% (407 of 455), caesarean delivery of both twins was 7.7% (35 of 455) and caesarean delivery of only the second twin was 2.9% (13 of 455). The major reasons for unplanned caesarean delivery were arrest of labour and non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern. The rate of umbilical cord prolapse in the second twin was 1.8% (8 of 455). Multivariate analysis revealed that abnormal umbilical cord insertion in the second twin (velamentous or marginal) was the only significant factor for umbilical cord prolapse in the second twin (OR, 5.05, 95% CI 1.139 to 22.472, p=0.033).ConclusionsAbnormal umbilical cord insertion in the second twin (velamentous or marginal) was a significant factor for umbilical cord prolapse during delivery. Antenatal assessment of the second twin’s umbilical cord insertion using ultrasonography would be beneficial.


2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1159-1164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Yamada ◽  
Kazutoshi Cho ◽  
Takashi Yamada ◽  
Mamoru Morikawa ◽  
Hisanori Minakami

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document