scholarly journals PL.34 A Two Years Audit Of Incidence, Risk Factor, Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of Umbilical Cord Prolapse at Al Corniche Hospital Abu Dhabi UAE

2013 ◽  
Vol 98 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A64.1-A64
Author(s):  
T Perveen
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-326
Author(s):  
Madhusmita Hembram ◽  
Haritha Sagili

ABSTRACT Objective To assess associated risk factors, maternal and neonatal outcome of pregnancies complicated by umbilical cord prolapse in South Indian population. Study design It was a descriptive study. Risk factors, maternal and neonatal outcome were noted down retrospectively from case records of mothers affected by umbilical cord prolapse from April 2014 to March 2016. Results There were 39 cases of umbilical cord prolapse in 2 years. The incidence of umbilical cord prolapse in our hospital was 0.1%. Most of the women were ≤ 25 years of age (72%). Primis were 56%. Most common presentation in umbilical cord prolapse was cephalic presentation (64%). Among the affected individuals, 82% had term gestation, 79% had higher presenting part, and 87% had spontaneous rupture of membranes. Babies were delivered by lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) in 95% and birth weight was ≥2.5 kg in 67% of cases with umbilical cord prolapse. Decision to delivery interval (DDI) was ≤30 minutes in 84% of cases. APGAR score was ≥7 at 1 minute in 65% and ≥7 at 5 minutes in 83% of cases. There were 15 neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions and 2 stillbirths. Most common gender was male (75%). Conclusion In our study, maternal risk factors were different from traditional risk factors in relation to age, parity, period of gestation, presentation, and birth weight. But, station of presenting part, early dilatation of cervix at diagnosis, and male gender predominance were similar to traditional risk factors. Neonatal outcome was good in our study with no birth injuries. All cases should be monitored properly to reduce the occurrence of umbilical cord prolapse even in low-risk population. Early detection and intervention is required for good neonatal outcome. Umbilical cord prolapse should be managed by an expert obstetrician. How to cite this article Hembram M, Sagili H. Risk Factors, Maternal and Neonatal Outcome in Umbilical Cord Prolapse in South Indian Population. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2017;9(4):323-326.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e046616
Author(s):  
Rokuhiro Asahina ◽  
Hiroyuki Tsuda ◽  
Yuki Nishiko ◽  
Kazuya Fuma ◽  
Momoko Kuribayashi ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the success rate of vaginal delivery, the reasons for unplanned caesarean delivery, the rate of umbilical cord prolapse and the risk of umbilical cord prolapse in twin deliveries.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingSingle institution.ParticipantsThis study included 455 women pregnant with twins (307 dichorionic and 148 monochorionic) who attempted vaginal delivery from January 2009 to August 2018. The following criteria were considered for vaginal delivery: diamniotic twins, cephalic presentation of the first twin, no history of uterine scar, no other indications for caesarean delivery, no major structural abnormality in either twin and no fetal aneuploidy.ResultsThe rate of vaginal delivery of both twins was 89.5% (407 of 455), caesarean delivery of both twins was 7.7% (35 of 455) and caesarean delivery of only the second twin was 2.9% (13 of 455). The major reasons for unplanned caesarean delivery were arrest of labour and non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern. The rate of umbilical cord prolapse in the second twin was 1.8% (8 of 455). Multivariate analysis revealed that abnormal umbilical cord insertion in the second twin (velamentous or marginal) was the only significant factor for umbilical cord prolapse in the second twin (OR, 5.05, 95% CI 1.139 to 22.472, p=0.033).ConclusionsAbnormal umbilical cord insertion in the second twin (velamentous or marginal) was a significant factor for umbilical cord prolapse during delivery. Antenatal assessment of the second twin’s umbilical cord insertion using ultrasonography would be beneficial.


2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1159-1164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Yamada ◽  
Kazutoshi Cho ◽  
Takashi Yamada ◽  
Mamoru Morikawa ◽  
Hisanori Minakami

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document