scholarly journals Totally Implantable Venous Access Device (Chemoport) in Oncology: Study of 168 Polyurethane Chemoport Catheter System

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 261-264
Author(s):  
Gyanendra Swaroop Mittal ◽  
Deepak Sundriyal ◽  
Niranjan B. Naik ◽  
Amit Sehrawat
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Access Device ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Catheter System ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Polyurethane Catheters ◽  
Venous Access Device ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background Chemoport (totally implantable venous access device) and its catheter system are used to administer long-term chemotherapy in cancer patients. The objective of this study was to analyze the complications associated with chemoport insertion in various cancer patients. Material and Methods A total number of 168 chemoports along with polyurethane catheters were inserted in various cancer patients over a period of 3 years. 9.6 F polyurethane catheters were put by a team of surgical oncologists in operation theater under general or local anesthesia. Analysis of the complications was done until the chemoport was removed due to any reason. Results Out of 168 patients, 30 (17.85%) developed complications. Complications included arterial puncture, malposition of the catheter tip, pneumothorax, hematoma, seroma, deep vein thrombosis, fracture of the catheter, a reversal of port, infections, and thrombosis of the catheter. Only a few required premature port and catheter removal. Conclusion There was a low rate of complications associated with chemoport using a polyurethane type of catheter system. However, infection-related complications were comparatively more common in our series. Chemoport requires expert handling, patient education, strict follow-up, and dedicated teamwork to minimize complications.

Risk factors determining central venous access device-associated deep vein thrombosis resolution in children: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel García-Boyano ◽  
José Manuel Caballero-Caballero ◽  
Marta García Fernández de Villalta ◽  
Mar Gutiérrez Alvariño ◽  
María Jesús Blanco Bañares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Central Venous Access Device ◽  
Access Device ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Access Device ◽  
Deep Vein

A new peripherally implanted subcutaneous permanent central venous access device for patients requiring chemotherapy.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2181-2185 ◽  
Author(s):  
R R Salem ◽  
B A Ward ◽  
T S Ravikumar
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Tracking System ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Central Venous Access Device ◽  
Access Device ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Venous Access Device

PURPOSE A peripherally implanted central venous access device (P.A.S. Port; Pharmacia Deltec Inc, St Paul, MN) was evaluated for ease of insertion, functionality, acceptance, and complications in patients who required long-term venous access. A hand-held tracking system (Cath-Finder; Pharmacia Deltec Inc) used to determine catheter tip location was also evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS A P.A.S. Port was placed in 47 patients who required long-term intravenous access. The median follow-up duration has been 32 weeks (range, 2 to 112). Total usage has been 2,028 catheter-weeks. The Cath-Finder was used to determine catheter tip location during insertion. Nursing staff and patient satisfaction were polled and functionality and complications were recorded. RESULTS The device was found to be simple to insert, the procedure well tolerated, and, with one exception, the Cath-Finder accurately predicted catheter tip location. There was a 6.4% incidence of transient phlebitis and a 6.4% incidence of symptomatic axillary or subclavian vein thrombosis. There were no infectious complications. Access was simple in all but two obese patients. The device functioned well in all patients, except three in whom blood aspiration was difficult and two in whom fluid administration was slow. The device was well tolerated by all patients and nursing staff satisfaction was high. CONCLUSION This device provides a highly acceptable, additional method of implantable, permanent central venous access for chemotherapy patients with a low complication rate. The successful use of the Cath-Finder and minor extent of the procedure may allow this device to be inserted in a clinic procedure room without sedation and fluoroscopy.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Quality of Life of Patients with Breast or Colon Cancer with an Arm Vein Port (TIVAD) Versus a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 1495-1506
Author(s):  
Brent Burbridge ◽  
Hyun Lim ◽  
Lynn Dwernychuk ◽  
Ha Le ◽  
Tehmina Asif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Access Device ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Venous Access Device

Introduction: Venous access is a crucial element in chemotherapy delivery. It remains unclear whether cancer patients prefer a port to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Our study aimed to assess cancer patients’ satisfaction with their venous access device and to compare the quality of life (QoL) of subjects with a PICC to those with a port. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, EORTC QLQ-C30, and a locally developed quality of life survey (QLAVD), designed to assess satisfaction with venous access devices, were administered to breast or colorectal cancer patients over a one-year period following the device insertion. Mixed effects models were used to assess changes on mean scores at different time points. Results: A total of 101 patients were recruited over a three-year period, (PICC group, n = 50; port group, n = 51). Survey response rates for months one and three were 72% and 48%, respectively. Overall, no significant differences were noted between the two groups in relation to EORTC QOL. At three months, the mean pain scores were 3.5 ± 2.3 for the port and 1.3 ± 0.75 for PICC (<0.001). The mean score for a negative effect of the venous access device on psychosocial well-being was 6.0 ± 4.1 for PICC and 3.0 ± 2.7 for the port (p = 0.005). Complications related to PICCs occurred in 38% patients versus 41% with a port (p > 0.24). Conclusions: Although subjects with a port experienced more pain during the device insertion or access for chemotherapy, it had a smaller negative impact on psychosocial scores than the PICC. No significant differences in complications rates were observed between the two devices.

Late fracture of Groshong ports: A report of the three cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 563-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumito Saijo ◽  
Mitsuhisa Mutoh ◽  
Joho Tokumine ◽  
Odaka Yoshinobu ◽  
Hikaru Hama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Jugular Vein ◽  
Jugular Vein ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Access Device ◽  
Device Implantation ◽  
Catheter Fracture ◽  
Venous Access Device ◽  
Enhanced Computed Tomography ◽  
Venous Access Devices

Background: Totally implantable venous access devices are valuable tools for total parenteral nutrition, chemotherapy, and long-term intravenous therapy. However, late catheter fracture is a well-known complication of totally implantable venous access device, particularly in Groshong silicone catheter. Recently, a specific type of totally implantable venous access device made with Groshong silicone has been introduced to facilitate power injection of contrast medium for enhanced computed tomography. Cases description: We reported three cases of catheter fracture in power-injectable Groshong silicone totally implantable venous access device. From May 2012 to August 2014, 66 patients underwent power-injectable Groshong silicone totally implantable venous access device implantation at our institution, with a median follow-up of 20.1 (range 0.2–58.1) months. The catheters in all patients were inserted into the internal jugular vein under ultrasound guidance and were connected to the port implanted in the upper chest through the subcutaneous tunnel. Chemotherapy was administered using these routes. Fractures of all three cases specifically showed a torn catheter section: smooth surface on one side, and a rough edge on the other side of the catheter, suggesting that long-term repeated stretch force may be related with the mechanism of fracture. Conclusion: Totally implantable venous access devices with Groshong silicone catheters, if inserted via the internal jugular vein, have a potential risk for late catheter fracture.

Implantable central venous access device in infants: Long-term results

2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 1027-1031
Author(s):  
Koichi Ohno ◽  
Tatsuo Nakaoka ◽  
Yuichi Takama ◽  
Atsushi Higashio ◽  
Kenji Santo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Central Venous Access Device ◽  
Access Device ◽  
Venous Access Device

Infection of totally implantable venous access devices: A review of the literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fulvio Pinelli ◽  
Elena Cecero ◽  
Dario Degl’Innocenti ◽  
Valentina Selmi ◽  
Rosa Giua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Intravenous Therapy ◽  
Access Device ◽  
Venous Access Device ◽  
Treatment Of Infection ◽  
Venous Access Devices

Totally implantable venous access devices, or ports, are essential in the therapeutic management of patients who require long-term intermittent intravenous therapy. Totally implantable venous access devices guarantee safe infusion of chemotherapy, blood transfusion, parenteral nutrition, as well as repeated blood samples. Minimizing the need for frequent vascular access, totally implantable venous access devices also improve the patient’s quality of life. Nonetheless, totally implantable venous access devices are not free from complications. Among those, infection is the most relevant, affecting patients’ morbidity and mortality—both in the hospital or outpatient setting—and increasing healthcare costs. Knowledge of pathogenesis and risk factors of totally implantable venous access device–related infections is crucial to prevent this condition by adopting proper insertion bundles and maintenance bundles based on the best available evidence. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment of infection are of paramount importance. As a totally implantable venous access device–related infection occurs, device removal or a conservative approach should be chosen in treating this complication. For both prevention and therapy, antimicrobial lock is a major matter of controversy and a promising field for future clinical studies. This article reviews current evidences in terms of epidemiology, pathogenesis and risk factors, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of totally implantable venous access device–related infections.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document