Peak Vertical Jump Power as a Marker of Bone Health in Children

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (08) ◽  
pp. 653-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Baptista ◽  
P. Mil-Homens ◽  
A. Carita ◽  
K. Janz ◽  
L. Sardinha
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Maulit ◽  
David C. Archer ◽  
Whitney D. Leyva ◽  
Cameron N. Munger ◽  
Megan A. Wong ◽  
...  

Background: Recent research has compared explosive deadlift to kettlebell training observing their effects on strength. The kettlebell swing is a popular practical exercise as it shares share a hip hinge movement with the explosive deadlift, but the two have not been compared. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of kettlebell swing vs. explosive deadlift training on strength and power. Methods: Thirty-one recreationally resistance-trained men (age = 23.1 ± 2.3 years, height = 175.5 ± 6.6 cm, mass = 83.9 ± 13.8 kg, 1RM deadlift = 159.9 ± 31.7 kg) were randomly assigned to one of two groups [kettlebell swing group (KBG) n = 15, or explosive deadlift group (EDLG) n = 16]. Vertical jump height, isometric mid-thigh pull (MTP), and 1RM deadlift were measured pre and post training. Both groups trained twice per week for 4 weeks. Volume and load were increased after the first 2 weeks of training. Results: A 2 (time) x 2 (group) mixed factor ANOVA revealed a significant (P<0.05) increase in deadlift 1RM (pre: 159.9 ± 31.7 kg, post: 168.9 ± 31.8 kg) and vertical jump height (pre: 56.6 ± 9.9 cm, post: 57.9 ± 9.7 cm) for both groups, but were not significantly different between groups. There were no significant changes in MTP. Conclusions: Strength and conditioning professionals may use both kettlebell swings and explosive deadlifts to increase deadlift strength and vertical jump power.


2014 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 964-965
Author(s):  
Michael B. La Monica ◽  
Gerald T. Mangine ◽  
Adam M. Gonzalez ◽  
Adam J. Wells ◽  
Jeremy R. Townsend ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 41-42
Author(s):  
Ahalee C. Cathey ◽  
Chinonye C. Agu-Udemba ◽  
Eric J. Sobolewski ◽  
Brennan J. Thompson ◽  
Ty B. Palmer

Author(s):  
Doug Hillis ◽  
Matthew Okrainec

Previous research has indicated that performing repetitions to failure at greater than 80% one repetition max (1 RM) one day per week using a non-­‐linear training program can maintain strength and power in many athletic populations. However, this finding has not been directly assessed in male university volleyball players. The purpose of this study was to determine if non-­‐linear training two days a week could maintain upper and lower body strength, and vertical jump power and height over the course of a competitive volleyball season, measured at three time points. Eleven trained Canadian Interuniversity Sport (CIS) male athletes were a part of a single training group which completed a maintenance program consisting of non-­‐linear training for 17 weeks. At each testing time point, the participants completed a bench press, squat, squat jump, countermovement jump, and three step jump and reach. We predicted that non-­‐linear resistance training of mixed intensities twice a week would allow players to maintain strength, vertical jump power, and vertical jump height. Results indicated that upper body strength can be maintained over the course of a competition period with non-­‐linear resistance training (p = 0.043). Scores for lower body strength, vertical jump squat jump power, vertical jump countermovement jump power, and vertical jump height increased over the course of the season (p's < 0.001, 0.14, 0.181, and 0.006, respectively). Our results indicate that male volleyball players can benefit from non-­‐linear training to maintain or improve performance when training at > 80% 1 RM to failure once a week during a competition season. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Yingling ◽  
Rebekkah Reichert ◽  
Andrew Denys ◽  
Priscilla Franson ◽  
Kimberly Espartero ◽  
...  

Osteoporosis is considered a pediatric disease with geriatric consequences. However, measuring bone strength in children is complex and creates a practical problem for health professionals, teachers and parents. A non-invasive measure of muscle fitness that correlates to bone strength may provide a means to monitor bone strength throughout the lifespan. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between common muscle function tests (relative grip strength (RGS), peak vertical jump power (PP)) and bone strength in the radial diaphysis and epiphysis of a healthy population. Healthy participants (n=147 (81 female)) performed a bilateral grip strength test using a hand dynamometer, and a maximal vertical jump test. Peak vertical jump power was calculated from maximal jump height using the Sayer’s equation. Moment of inertia (MoI), cortical area (CoA), cortical bone mineral density (cBMD), and polar strength-strain index (SSIp) were measured using peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) to determine bone strength parameters at the 66% radial site (predominantly cortical bone). At the 4% site (trabecular bone site), bone mineral content (vBMC.tb), bone mineral density (vBMD.tb), total area (ToA.tb) and bone strength index (BSIc) were measured. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses determined the relationship of each muscle function test for each bone envelope (cortical and trabecular). For the cortical bone measurements: RGS, and PP were both significantly correlated with CoA, MoI, and SSIp. Peak vertical jump power predicted bone strength parameters to a greater extent compared to RGS. For the trabecular bone envelope, RGS was not a predictor of bone strength however peak power was a significant predictor of bone strength parameters. Peak vertical jump power was a significant predictor of bone strength at both trabecular and cortical radial sites. Interestingly PP, a lower limb measurement explained the most variance in the bone strength of the upper limb.


2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 273-274
Author(s):  
Peter N. Frykman ◽  
Kathryn M. Taylor ◽  
Barry A. Spiering ◽  
Marilyn A. Sharp ◽  
Brittany R. Hotaling ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (16) ◽  
pp. 1576-1585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasho James MacKenzie ◽  
Robert J. Lavers ◽  
Brendan B. Wallace

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (18) ◽  
pp. 1781-1787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter D. Mundy ◽  
Neal A. Smith ◽  
Mike A. Lauder ◽  
Jason P. Lake
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document