Treatment guidelines of the Movement Disorder Society for deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Herzog ◽  
J Volkmann ◽  
G Deuschl
2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. A11.1-A11
Author(s):  
Andrew Evans ◽  
Victor SC Fung ◽  
John O’Sullivan ◽  
Rick Stell ◽  
Richard White ◽  
...  

IntroductionTo evaluate the proportion of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients identified as having advanced Parkinson’s disease (APD) according to physician’s judgement: Australian results.MethodsThis cross-sectional, non-interventional observational study was performed in movement disorder clinics from 18 countries. Results from the Australian cohort are presented here. Participants included consecutive adults with PD attending a routine clinical visit, or inpatients at participating clinical sites, and who could speak English. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients diagnosed with APD via physician judgement. Secondary objectives included to evaluate clinical characteristics of APD versus non-APD; to assess the percentage of APD considered for device-aided therapies (DAT); to explore referral practices for APD; and to compare the percentage of APD identified in routine clinical practice by physician’s judgment to APD identified based on APD criteria derived using the Delphi method.Results100 patients were recruited in Australia: 61.0% (95%CI 51.4%–70.6%) diagnosed with APD by physician judgement. Patients were 66.6±8.5 years, 65% were male, were living at home (97%), and diagnosed for median 10.7 years (0–30.5 years). Motor fluctuations were present in 68%. For those with APD, referral was predominantly to enable access to DAT (49%), while for non-APD, referral was largely for diagnostic purposes (41%). Referral to a movement disorder clinic occurred 4.8 years (median) following diagnosis for APD, or 3.6 years for non-APD. While 62% were eligible for DAT, only two-thirds of these received them. The most commonly used DAT was deep brain stimulation (64.3%). There was fair agreement between physician’s judgement and the APD criteria by Delphi method (Cohen’s kappa) 0.325 (95%CI 0.150–0.500).ConclusionThe definition of APD requires refinement in order to facilitate greater agreement among movement disorder specialists. A third of PD patients eligible for DAT remain untreated. Current Australian practice is weighted towards deep brain stimulation.


2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Gierthmühlen ◽  
P Arning ◽  
G Wasner ◽  
A Binder ◽  
J Herzog ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 158-173

Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by a dopamine deficiency that presents with motor symptoms. Visual disorders can occur concomitantly but are frequently overlooked. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been an effective treatment to improve tremors, stiffness and overall mobility, but little is known about its effects on the visual system. Case Report: A 75-year-old Caucasian male with PD presented with longstanding binocular diplopia. On baseline examination, the best-corrected visual acuity was 20/25 in each eye. On observation, he had noticeable tremors with an unsteady gait. Distance alternating cover test showed exophoria with a right hyperphoria. Near alternating cover test revealed a significantly larger exophoria accompanied by a reduced near point of convergence. Additional testing with a 24-2 Humphrey visual field and optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the nerve and macula were unremarkable. The patient underwent DBS implantation five weeks after initial examination, and the device was activated four weeks thereafter. At follow up, the patient still complained of intermittent diplopia. There was no significant change in the manifest refraction or prism correction. On observation, the patient had remarkably improved tremors with a steady gait. All parameters measured were unchanged. The patient was evaluated again seven months after device activation. Although vergence ranges at all distances were improved, the patient was still symptomatic for intermittent diplopia. OCT scans of the optic nerve showed borderline but symmetric thinning in each eye. All other parameters measured were unchanged. Conclusion: The case found no significant changes on ophthalmic examination after DBS implantation and activation in a patient with PD. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there are no other cases in the literature that investigated the effects of DBS on the visual system pathway in a patient with PD before and after DBS implantation and activation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document