Towards Community and Non-Profit Media Legislation in South America

Author(s):  
Arne Hintz
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (S367) ◽  
pp. 116-119
Author(s):  
S. Durst ◽  
M. Safonova ◽  
S. Paolantonio ◽  
M. E. Colazo ◽  
G. Li

AbstractGalaxy Forum (GF) South America 2020, was held virtually on December 8, 2020 on the opening eve of IAU 367 by the International Lunar Observatory Association (ILOA Hawai’i) with the support of the Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (ITeDA, CNEA-CONICET-UNSAM) and IAU. Galaxy Forum is an education and outreach program sponsored by ILOA, an interglobal enterprise incorporated in Hawaii as a non-profit organization to expand human knowledge of the Cosmos through observation from our Moon and to participate in internationally cooperative lunar base build-out.As a IAU-367 associated event, Galaxy Forum featured comments by Dr. Beatriz Garcia and presentations by ILOA Director Steve Durst (ILOA Hawai’i, USA), Marcelo Colazo (CONAE, Argentina); César Gonzalez García (CSIC, Spain); Li Geng (NAOC, China); Santiago Paolantonio (Córdoba Observatory, Argentina) and Margarita Safonova (IIA, India). In this contribution, the overview of the contributions permits an approach to the GF interests.


Author(s):  
Pablo Guerra

Durante un tiempo considerable buena parte de la doctrina cooperativa señalaba que las cooperativas eran entidades sin fines de lucro. Algunas leyes, sobre todo de mediados del S. XX, recogían esa fórmula a la hora de definir la naturaleza de estas particulares empresas. En la actualidad, sin embargo, doctrina y legislaciones parecen abandonar dicha formulación. En este artículo ahondaremos en las razones de esta evolución y analizaremos cómo los textos legales más representativos que sobre la economía social y solidaria se han ido gestando en diferentes países de América en lo que va del S. XXI, han tratado la naturaleza de las empresas del sector solidario en relación con el lucro. For a long time some cooperative doctrine defined the cooperatives as a non-profit corporation. Some laws, especially of mid-20th century, defined the nature of these particular organizations using this idea. Today, however, doctrine and legislation seem to leave such formulation. In this article we analize into the reasons for this evolution and will look at how the most representative SSE laws in different countries of South America have recognize the nature of the SSE sector in relation to the profits.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 79-95
Author(s):  
Latifa Alsalmi ◽  
Robert Mayo

Presently, no clear picture is available about the facilities providing clinical services for persons who stutter (PWS) in Kuwait. This information is crucial for any awareness program to be established in the future. The purpose of this study was to identify clinical facilities and speech-language personnel that provide services for PWS in Kuwait. Participants consisted of 21 clinical directors of governmental medical centers, non-profit clinics, and private clinics as well as department heads of governmental school clinics where speech-language services were provided. Participants were interviewed regarding the availability of speech-language services within their centers and whether or not PWS receive services. The results revealed that four out of five governmental medical centers with a total of 32 speech-language pathologists (SLPs) provided services for PWS. Additionally, 12 schools of special education were found to have 62 SLPs on their staff providing fluency services for students. Finally, two stand-alone private clinics and one non-profit clinic provided services for PWS. Results indicated an overall shortage of SLPs in the country, especially in medical settings. This study sets the foundation for a series of future studies investigating the type and quality of stuttering services provided by the identified facilities in Kuwait.


2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Kauffeld
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc ◽  

Zusammenfassung. Der FEO, der in Kooperation mit betrieblichen Praktikern entwickelt wurde, dient der Erfassung des Organisationsklimas. Er umfasst 82 Items und bildet 12 Skalen ab. Eine Stärke des FEO im Gegensatz zu ad hoc entwickelten Befragungsinstrumenten sind die Vergleichsdaten, die für Profit- und Non-Profit-Organisationen bereit gestellt werden. Kritisch diskutiert wird die theoretische Verortung, die Anwenderfreundlichkeit sowie der Nutzen der individuellen Auswertung. Die konsensuale, konvergente, diskriminante und kriterienbezogene Validierung steht aus.


Author(s):  
Rosa Gonzalez-Quevedo ◽  
Constantinos Ziogas ◽  
Ivana Silva ◽  
Rosan Vegter ◽  
Anthony Humphreys

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document