Frequently used Active Learning Techniques and Their Impact: a Critical Review of Existing Journal Literature in the United States

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Ishiyama
2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 34-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Yu Cheng ◽  
Eileen R. Fowles ◽  
Lorraine O. Walker

1990 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 857-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsie Darrah Morey

William C. Darrah, educator, geologist, botanist, and historian, loved life, and he chose to share with others his genuine enjoyment of discovery and learning through his writing and teaching. His A Critical Review of the Upper Carboniferous Floras of the Eastern United States (1970) and nearly a hundred professional papers made his name familiar to many paleontologists in Pennsylvania and throughout the United States. It is interesting to note that early in his career Bill developed an interest in the early conifers, especially Walchia. At the time of his death, he had just completed a manuscript with Paul Lyons, “The Earliest Conifers in North America: Upland and/or Paleoclimatic Indicators?,” “which has been accepted for publication in PALAIOS. Most recently, having attended the International Geological Conference in the United States in 1933, Bill had hoped to present a paper on the Dunkard at the July 1989 IGC in Washington, D.C.


1999 ◽  
pp. 460-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES A. SAIDI ◽  
DAVID T. CHANG ◽  
ERIK T. GOLUBOFF ◽  
EMILIA BAGIELLA ◽  
GEARY OLSEN ◽  
...  

1957 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Schwarz ◽  
Gerald L. Baum

1987 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mildred A. Schwartz

In a Recent Critical review of sociological perspectives on historical problems, Skocpol observed, “Until the 1970s, ‘historical sociology’ was not a phrase one often, if ever, heard in conversations among sociologists in the United States” (Skocpol, 1984: 356). Of course there was a good deal of prior historical work by sociologists, some of which Skocpol herself goes on to cite. Yet, by her phrasing, she has inadvertently raised a question about the place of history in the discipline of sociology. Like almost all sociologists who use historical materials or perspectives, Skocpol sees reason to complain about the failure of sociology to give a larger place to history. But for me, a prior issue, in the spirit of a historically minded sociology, involves discovering what happened to the name “historical sociology.” The naming of an activity, in this case historical sociology, and its performance—historical research and interpretations by sociologists—are quite distinct. The first task is to clarify their relationship.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document