The IT value quest: How to capture the business value of IT-based infrastructure

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-204
Author(s):  
A Brown
2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Govindan Marthandan ◽  
Tang Chun Meng

For years information technology (IT) has helped companies improve organizational efficiency and effectiveness. Today’s IT plays a more strategic role in building capabilities for sustaining and creating competitive advantages. The increasing importance of IT has led many organizations to integrate it into their daily operations. To justify the ever-increasing spending on IT, organizations have been searching for evaluation methods to prove the business value of IT. However, this is a challenging undertaking, as there are contradictory answers to questions on whether it is worthwhile to pay substantial sums for IT. To gain insight into the reasons behind the contradictory answers, this paper first reviews conflicting research results of past studies on IT business value. It then explains the term IT productivity paradox. Last, it provides five reasons why IT business value is not fully reflected in the way business managers expect it to be.


Author(s):  
Sunil Pathak ◽  
Venkataraghavan Krishnaswamy ◽  
Mayank Sharma

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to measure the business value of IT (BVIT) and illustrate the relationship between IT practices and BVIT. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses a case study approach to collect the subject firm data over a period of one year. The data are about various IT systems used in the firm and their associated capital and operational cost components. The derived data are then compared with industry benchmarks. Findings The IT practices employed by the firm enable it to achieve a BVIT which is higher than the industry norm, from both strategic and operational perspectives. Research limitations/implications In this study, a year’s worth of data from a single firm is considered. The temporal frame of the research data limits the generalization of the results. To improve the generalizability, data from many years and across many firms may be used. Practical implications The paper provides insights to managers to identify the measures of BVIT. Further, managers can make necessary interventions based on IT practices to derive IT capabilities which, in turn, impact the firm’s performance. Originality/value The contribution of the work is manifold: illustration of the relationship between IT practices and BVIT; illustration of a methodology to evaluate firm-level BVIT; and an approach to collect IT expenses – both capital and operational level.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 378-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lily Sun ◽  
Kecheng Liu ◽  
Dian Indrayani Jambari ◽  
Vaughan Michell

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-251
Author(s):  
Yi Wang ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Yeyuan Dai ◽  
Danming Lin

Author(s):  
Michael D. S. Harris ◽  
David Herron ◽  
Stasia Iwanicki

Author(s):  
A.J. Gilbert Silvius

The relation between IT and value is a complex and often disputed one. Researchers and practitioners have created numerous models and valuation methods to capture this value, yet the advanced methods they have developed are hardly used. While these sophisticated instruments are based on scientific methods and empirical evidence, managers reject them, preferring to use methods they intuitively understand. What is missing that causes this mismatch? This chapter aims to add to the understanding of valuation methods by providing a comprehensive selection model for selecting the valuation method that fits the characteristics of the investment. The authors provide a categorized overview of valuation method and identify the qualities of and issues with each method or approach. They analyze how these methods can be combined in an investment selection process and identify the characteristics of an investment that determine the applicability of a given method. They conclude the paper by combining these characteristics in a decision tree shaped selection model to select the appropriate valuation method for any given set of characteristics.


2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 (1) ◽  
pp. K1-K6
Author(s):  
Michael T. K. Tan ◽  
K. S. Raman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document