Nitrate Removal with Sulfur-Limestone Autotrophic Denitrification Processes

1999 ◽  
Vol 125 (8) ◽  
pp. 721-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel M. Flere ◽  
Tian C. Zhang
2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 1545-1554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting-ting Zhu ◽  
Hao-yi Cheng ◽  
Li-hui Yang ◽  
Shi-gang Su ◽  
Hong-cheng Wang ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (21) ◽  
pp. 2692-2697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaomei Lv ◽  
Mingfei Shao ◽  
Ji Li ◽  
Chuanbo Xie

2016 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 240-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Xing ◽  
Desheng Li ◽  
Jinlong Li ◽  
Qianyi Hu ◽  
Shihai Deng

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 2913
Author(s):  
Feng Liu ◽  
Suqin Wang ◽  
Xuezhi Zhang ◽  
Feiyue Qian ◽  
Yaobing Wang ◽  
...  

Contamination of wastewater with organic-limited nitrates has become an urgent problem in wastewater treatment. The cooperating heterotrophic with sulfur autotrophic denitrification is an alternative process and the efficiency has been assessed in many studies treating simulated wastewater under different operating conditions. However, due to the complex and diverse nature of actual wastewater, more studies treating actual wastewater are still needed to evaluate the feasibility of collaborative denitrification. In this study, lab-scale experiments were performed with actual nitrate polluted water of two different concentrations, with glucose and sodium thiosulfate introduced as mixed electron donors in the coupling sulfur-based autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification. Results showed that the optimum denitrification performance was exhibited when the influent substrate mass ratio of C/N/S was 1.3/1/1.9, with a maximum denitrification rate of 3.52 kg NO3−-N/(m3 day) and nitrate removal efficiency of 93% in the coupled systems. Illumina high-throughput sequencing analysis revealed that autotrophic, facultative, and heterotrophic bacteria jointly contributed to high nitrogen removal efficiency. The autotrophic denitrification maintained as the predominant process, while the second most prevalent denitrification process gradually changed from heterotrophic to facultative with the increase of influent concentration at optimum C/N/S ratio conditions. Furthermore, the initiation of dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) was very pivotal in promoting the entire denitrification process. These results suggested that sulfur-based autotrophic coupled with heterotrophic denitrifying process is an alternative and promising method to treat nitrate containing wastewater.


1996 ◽  
Vol 34 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 469-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Koenig ◽  
L. H. Liu

One of the most economical means of nitrogen removal from leachate is biological treatment by nitrification, followed by heterotrophic denitrification. An alternative biological denitrification process is autotrophic denitrification using Thiobacillus denitrificans. This autotrophic bacteria oxidizes elemental sulphur to sulphate while reducing nitrate to elemental nitrogen gas, thereby eliminating the need for addition of organic carbon compounds. For this study, pilot-scale elemental sulphur packed bed columns with fixed-film denitrification have been selected as the most suitable treatment process. The effect of hydraulic retention time as well as the effect of concentration and loading rate of nitrate on nitrate removal efficiency as a function of sulphur particle size were determined. The results indicate that (i) autotrophic denitrification can effectively remove nitrate from synthetic and actual nitrified leachate at concentrations much higher than hitherto reported; (ii) the minimum hydraulic retention time necessary for complete denitrification depends on sulphur particle size; (iii) the maximum area loading rate, in g NO3−-N/m2·d, appears to be the process limiting factor and is practically independent of sulphur particle size; and (iv) the observed stoichiometric relationships compare well with those previously reported.


2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1625-1634
Author(s):  
Jun feng Su ◽  
Ting ting Lian ◽  
Ting lin Huang ◽  
Dong hui Liang ◽  
Wen dong Wang

Abstract In this study, strain CC76, identified as Enterobacter sp., was tested for the reduction of Fe3+ and denitrification using immobilized pellets with strain CC76 as experimental group (IP) and immobilized pellets with strain CC76 and magnetite powder as experimental group (IPM) in the autotrophic denitrification immobilized systems (ADIS). Compared with IP, a higher nitrate removal rate was obtained with IPM by using three levels of influent Fe3+ (0, 5, and 10 mg/L), four levels of pH (5.0, 6.0, 7.0, and 8.0), and three levels of hydraulic retention time (HRT) (12, 14, and 16 h), respectively. Furthermore, response surface methodology (RSM) analysis demonstrated that the optimum removal ratios of nitrate of 87.21% (IP) and 96.27% (IPM) were observed under the following conditions: HRT of 12 h, pH of 7.0 and influent Fe3+ concentration of 5 mg/L (IP) and 1 mg/L (IPM).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document