Review of The Architect's Studio Companion: Rules of Thumb for Preliminary Design by Edward Allen and Joseph Iano

1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 204-205
Author(s):  
Frederick S. Merritt
Author(s):  
Jerome P. Jarrett ◽  
Tiziano Ghisu ◽  
Geoffrey T. Parks

The turbomachinery aerodynamic design process is characterized both by its complexity and the reliance on designer experience for success. Complexity has led to the design being decomposed into modules; the specification of their interfaces is a key outcome of preliminary design and locks-in much of the final performance of the machine. Yet preliminary design is often heavily influenced by previous experience. While modularity makes the design tractable, it complicates the appropriate specification of the module interfaces to maximize whole-system performance: coupling of modularity and designer experience may reduce performance. This paper sets out to examine how such a deficit might occur and to quantify its cost in terms of efficiency. Two disincentives for challenging decomposition decisions are discussed. The first is where tried-and-tested engineering “rules of thumb” accord between modules: the rational engineer will find alluring a situation where each module can be specified in a way that maximizes its efficiency in isolation. The second is where there is discontinuity in modeling fidelity, and hence difficulty in accurately assessing performance exchange rates, between modules. In order to both quantify and reduce the potential cost of this coupling we have recast the design problem in such a way that what were previously module interface constraints become key system design variables. An example application of our method to the design of a generic turbofan core compression system is introduced. It is shown that nearly 1 percentage point equivalent compressor adiabatic efficiency can be saved.


2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome P. Jarrett ◽  
Tiziano Ghisu ◽  
Geoffrey T. Parks

The turbomachinery aerodynamic design process is characterized both by its complexity and the reliance on designer experience for success. Complexity has led to the design being decomposed into modules; the specification of their interfaces is a key outcome of preliminary design and locks-in much of the final performance of the machine. Yet preliminary design is often heavily influenced by previous experience. While modularity makes the design tractable, it complicates the appropriate specification of the module interfaces to maximize whole-system performance: coupling of modularity and designer experience may reduce performance. This paper sets out to examine how such a deficit might occur and to quantify its cost in terms of efficiency. Two disincentives for challenging decomposition decisions are discussed. The first is where tried-and-tested engineering “rules of thumb” accord between modules: the rational engineer will find alluring a situation where each module can be specified in a way that maximizes its efficiency in isolation. The second is where there is discontinuity in modeling fidelity, and hence difficulty in accurately assessing performance exchange rates between modules. In order to both quantify and reduce the potential cost of this coupling, we have recast the design problem in such a way that what were previously module interface constraints become key system design variables. An example application of our method to the design of a generic turbofan core compression system is introduced. It is shown that nearly one percentage point of the equivalent compressor adiabatic efficiency can be saved.


PCI Journal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-179
Author(s):  
Roberto Piccinin ◽  
Arturo E. Schultz

Author(s):  
Y. Anggoro

The Belida field is an offshore field located in Block B of Indonesia’s South Natuna Sea. This field was discovered in 1989. Both oil and gas bearing reservoirs are present in the Belida field in the Miocene Arang, Udang and Intra Barat Formations. Within the middle Arang Formation, there are three gas pay zones informally referred to as Beta, Gamma and Delta. These sand zones are thin pay zones which need to be carefully planned and economically exploited. Due to the nature of the reservoir, sand production is a challenge and requires downhole sand control. A key challenge for sand control equipment in this application is erosion resistance without inhibiting productivity as high gas rates and associated high flow velocity is expected from the zones, which is known to have caused sand control failure. To help achieve a cost-effective and easily planned deployment solution to produce hydrocarbons, a rigless deployment is the preferred method to deploy downhole sand control. PSD analysis from the reservoir zone suggested from ‘Industry Rules of Thumb’ a conventional gravel pack deployment as a means of downhole sand control. However, based on review of newer globally proven sand control technologies since adoption of these ‘Industry Rules of Thumb’, a cost-effective solution could be considered and implemented utilizing Ceramic Sand Screen technology. This paper will discuss the successful application at Block B, Natuna Sea using Ceramic Sand Screens as a rigless intervention solution addressing the erosion / hot spotting challenges in these high rate production zones. The erosion resistance of the Ceramic Sand Screen design allows a deployment methodology directly adjacent to the perforated interval to resist against premature loss of sand control. The robust ceramic screen design gave the flexibility required to develop a cost-effective lower completion deployment methodology both from a challenging make up in the well due to a restrictive lubricator length to the tractor conveyancing in the well to land out at the desired set depth covering the producing zone. The paper will overview the success of multi-service and product supply co-operation adopting technology enablers to challenge ‘Industry Rules of Thumb’ replaced by rigless reasoning as a standard well intervention downhole sand control solution where Medco E&P Natuna Ltd. (Medco E&P) faces sand control challenges in their high deviation, sidetracked well stock. The paper draws final attention to the hydrocarbon performance gain resulting due to the ability for choke free production to allow drawing down the well at higher rates than initially expected from this zone.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Soegeng Hardjono

Parameter ratios are important information for the ship designer in the preliminary design stages. They can be used as a tool to identify the main parameter of vessel and their other technical characteristics. The information about parameter ratios of mono-hull vessel is currently available in Naval Architecture literatures, but it is not the case for the type of twin-hull vessel called catamaran. Having conducted technical analysis in this research, it has been identified that parameter ratios of passenger catamaran vessel made of FRP has values of L / B ratio from 2.52 up to 3.7, L / D ratio from 5.25 up to 11:24, slenderness ratio (Lwl/BwL) from  9 up to 12. Other values of various parameter ratios like B/T, D/T, L /√ L, and Displacement/L are also discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Meitha Soetardjo ◽  
Dian Purnamasari

Bantu Hidro-Oceanography (BHO) adalah salah satu satuan bantu dalam bidang survei Hidro-Oceanography yang termasuk dalam susunan tempur pendukung (Supporting Force). Untuk kepentingan tersebut maka preliminary design kapal Hidro-Oceanography dilaksanakan sebagai langkah awal dalam perencanaan dan pengadaan kapal Hidro-Oceanography untuk mengkaji karakteristik umum desain yaitu hidrostatik dan stabilitas sehingga aspek kelayakan kapal dapat terpenuhi. Analisa hasil kajian kinerja kapal Hidro-Oceanography dipersiapkan untuk pengujian tahanan/resistance model kapal.Keywords : Preliminary design1, Hydrostatic2, Stability3


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document