Bearing and Frictional Contributions to the Pullout Capacity of Geogrid Reinforcements in Cohesive Backfill

Author(s):  
Murad Abu-Farsakh ◽  
Khalid Farrag ◽  
Izzaldin Almohd ◽  
Ather Mohiuddin
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Y. S. Kim ◽  
K. O. Kim ◽  
Y. Cho ◽  
S. Bang ◽  
K. D. Jones

An analytical solution has been developed to estimate the inclined pullout capacity of an embedded suction anchor in clay seafloor. Validation has been made through comparisons with a limited number of centrifuge model test results. Results indicate that the inclined pullout capacity of an embedded suction anchor in clay decreases as the load inclination angle to the horizontal increases. As the point of the load application moves downward, the inclined pullout capacity increases, reaches its peak, and then starts to decrease.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 2625-2637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian-qing Zhang ◽  
Ruo-feng Feng ◽  
Zhen-hao Xu ◽  
Shan-wei Liu ◽  
Jian-gu Qian

2021 ◽  
Vol 318 ◽  
pp. 01002
Author(s):  
Mahdi O. Karkush ◽  
Omar J. Mukhlef

Screw piles are widely used in supporting structures subjected to pullout forces, such as power towers and offshore structures, and this research investigates their performance in gypseous soil of medium relative density. The bearing capacity and displacement of a single screw pile model inserted in gypseous soil with various diameters (D = 20, 30, and 40) mm are examined in this study. The soil used in the testing had a gypsum content of 40% and the bedding soil had a relative density of 40%. To simulate the pullout testing in the lab, a physical model was manufactured with specific dimensions. Three steel screw piles with helix diameters of 20, 30, and 40 mm are used, with a total length of 500 mm. The helix is continuous over the pile's embedded depth of 400 mm. The results of tests revealed that decreasing the length to diameter (H/D) ratio resulted in a higher pullout capacity of screw piles and a lower corresponding displacement.


2021 ◽  
Vol 318 ◽  
pp. 01010
Author(s):  
Mais S. Al-Tememy ◽  
Mohammed A. Al-Neami ◽  
Mohammed F. Asswad

Batter or raker piles are piles driven at an inclination with a vertical to resist large inclined or lateral forces. Many structures like offshore structures and towers are subjected to overturning moments due to wave pressure, wind load, and ship impacts. Therefore in such structures, a combination of the vertical and batter piles is used to transfer overturning moments in compression and tension forces to the foundation. This paper presents a three-dimensional finite element analysis using PLAXIS 3D software to study the battered pile's behavior under the effect of pullout load. Several variables that influence the pile tension capacity embedded in sandy soil are investigated. The pile models are steel piles embedded in the dense sand at different batter angles (0, 10, 20, and 30) degrees with two embedment ratios, L/d (15 and 20). To clarify the pile shape's influence on a pullout capacity, two shapes are used, a circular pile with a diameter equal to 20 mm and a square pile with a section of 15.7×15.7 mm. These dimensions are chosen to achieve an equal perimeter for both shapes. The numerical results pointed that the pile pullout capacity increases with the increasing of the batter angle and embedment ratio, and the maximum values are marked at a batter angle of 20o. The shape of the bending moment profile is a single curvature, and the peak values are located approximately at the midpoint of the battered pile, while a zero value is located at the pile tip and pile head.


PCI Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-87
Author(s):  
Sandip Chhetri ◽  
Rachel A. Chicchi ◽  
Andrew E. N. Osborn

Very little experimental data have been published relating to the pullout capacity of prestressing strand lifting loops. To address this gap in knowledge, 13 pullout tests were conducted on strand lifting loops with 0.6 in. (15.24 mm) diameter, 270 ksi (1860 MPa) strand. Straight and bent orientations were tested for single loops at different embedment depths. Loops were embedded in 12 in. (304.8 mm) wide and 44 in. (1117.6 mm) deep concrete blocks and subjected to monotonic, static loading until failure. Marginal bond quality of the strand (18.2 kip [81 kN]), Mohs hardness (3.6), and concrete strength (3000 psi [20.7 MPa]) resulted in an average bond stress value of 400 psi (2758 kPa) at failure. Most tests exhibited pullout failure modes and adequate ductility. Three loops tested at 32 in. (812.8 mm) embedment with 6 in. (152.4 mm), 90-degree bends experienced brittle side-face blowout failures. These failures were due to inclination of the lifting, which led to a reduced edge distance. A safe uniform bond stress of 199 psi (1372 kPa) is recommended for 0.6 in. diameter strand.


2016 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 39-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Tacettin Turker ◽  
Erdogan Ozbay ◽  
Muzeyyen Balcıkanlı

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 852-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
R S Merifield ◽  
S W Sloan

During the last 30 years various researchers have proposed approximate techniques to estimate the uplift capacity of soil anchors. As the majority of past research has been experimentally based, much current design practice is based on empiricism. Somewhat surprisingly, very few numerical analyses have been performed to determine the ultimate pullout loads of anchors. This paper presents the results of a rigorous numerical study to estimate the ultimate pullout load for vertical and horizontal plate anchors in frictional soils. Rigorous bounds have been obtained using two numerical procedures that are based on finite element formulations of the upper and lower bound theorems of limit analysis. For comparison purposes, numerical estimates of the break-out factor have also been obtained using the more conventional displacement finite element method. Results are presented in the familiar form of break-out factors based on various soil strength profiles and geometries and are compared with existing numerical and empirical solutions.Key words: anchor, pullout capacity, finite elements, limit analysis, lower bound, sand.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document